of course C6-01 for the newer, better, symbian^3 compared to both X6 and C6 for the old S60.

both are actually an old model. do u want to buy them? btw, never saw i900 camera b4. but for i800, it is quite impressive during their era

hmm.. maybe Experia X10 lor.. if want high mp (picture quality so-so) then maybe the outdated satio and samsung pixon 12 (IMO, pixon 12 is better.. satio is dead as SE will not provide any updates anymore) or, can wait, try SE Arc
samsung wave got a good HD record reputation too b4 N8 were release. camera is on par only IMO..
lastly, maybe SE C905 (if u don't want smartphone/touchscreen)

btw, u should ask this kind of question here, http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/1595187
this is model vs model

camera, maybe both are about the same. X6 comes with capacitive touchscreen, while N97mini is resistive. the sensitivity of N97mini's resistive is ok although it is resistive unit. if u are heavy messenger, better consider N97mini that have the physical qwerty. X6 didn't have external storage method. so, if u think either 8GB/16GB/32GB unit capacity is enough for u, then, it is ok to buy X6. some ppl just didn't enough that, so, u'll need external storage on microSD. well, N97 got 8GB built in memory. and expendable these are all hardware differences. both OS are the same IMO.. (well, if u ask me, i like N97mini design better )

N8 is too good for me if u are willing to do that (consider your health too ) if u have out of budget, u can sacrifice the 12mp awesome AF camera, xenon (and all N8 greatness), can adopt C6-01. symbian^3 is better than S60.
X6 will experienced that since it got no external memory.. it is to be expected for me

exactly

he mistakenly read "..3. I.." as "3.1" maybe..

if u got the money, Aria is better than wildfire. screen resolution is the major differences on both although both screen size is the same 3.2". the different in screen resolution gives Aria much broad choice of apps compared to Aria.
I think, Aria may not have multitouch, and is 256k colours screen compared to wildfire (have multitouch, 16m colours). correct me if i'm wrong here.
overall, Aria is better choice for enjoying more apps and better performance

HTC is far better than SE. reasons, HTCs body built quality is solid, quality plastic/metal used. SE, most feel a bit cheap.. apart from that, SE rarely gives updates on their phones. just look on the superior X10. it is very sad as that super smartphone (at the time it is released) stuck forever on the 2.1 (SE said no updates to 2.2), the software didn't unlock the true potential of the screen colours (although 16m ready, but SE just gives them 65k). HTC have a good customer after sale service. they provide updates on most of their phones. this is important because android always got some minor bugs (open source, it is to be expected)

nokia X6. vivaz is dead, as SE already abandoned symbian foundation. furthermore, X6 got a better capacitive touchscreen compared to resistive on vivaz. vivaz only wins on the HD record

bb got exclusive BIS and BBM if u happen to need them, bb is better. if u just sometimes only go online, for exmple only when wifi is around u, then, bb maybe not right. bb got a very fast push e-mail system. e72 also got push e-mail. but not as fast as bb. if u need to updates your e-mail fast, bb is better.

yes.. X10 will stuck forever (prior to previous notice by SE) on 2.1. it will never go 2.2 it very sad to have a very high end android there, (8mp, hd record, 1Ghz, 4" screen) to stuck on that. screen also not yet fully utilized to 16m colours. till now, still 65k. but to compared on both performance, X10 is winner there. X6, as symbian, mostly just a middle class smartphone X10 is considered as high end smartphone d. multitouch is coming soon for X10. furthermore, u can actually get 2.2 on X10 (illegally n void your warranty)

hmm.. so far, i heard papago perform quite well. maybe depend on area too. also, A-gps either enabled or not.
if u want more apps, more games, and u want to heavily customized your phone, definitely and android phones is better. for garmin asus A10, the community support is not vast as other android phones, such as desire, nexus one, X10. custom ROM/kernel maybe a bit less to found if u happen to like this customization stuff. and, very less number of android phones actually got front camera
symbian^3 as N8 doesn't have the best UI to begin with. IMO, the only part that i'm not really like for these symbian^3 phone is their text input other than those, they works fine though. they also comes with less powerful processor. they performance maybe not as fast as other 1Ghz smartphone. but they are acceptable, and symbian is one efficient platform. about apps, OVI currently growing, it don't have as many apps as android market. if u can live with it, less apps, not as fast as others, symbian^3 smartphone such as N8 is better compared to A10. u get the best cameraphone there

the gps part, factors effecting gps to function well, including weather, a-gps, location. so, u may want to ask those folks on android's papago thread to really clarify the performance of papago gps software.

for all 3, lets forget vivazpro ok since SE already abandon symbian. so, vivaz pro's all bugs and lags will never fixed.

so, give u n900 and e72. to be honest, e72 is so far below to be compared to n900 there. n900 is one good phone. It's OS (maemo5) allow a true multitasking (like what u got on the desktop), the web browser, is base on mozilla, and u got full flash support with it (facebook games, youtube, u mention. n900 can do it ). u also got carlzeiss lens camera with it. unlike e72, the camera is not really a performer. this is just piece from what n900 is truely is.

only e72 advantages compared to n900 (what i can think of ) is lighter weight, slimmer metal body, got full quick office;means u can edit office document on the go, hmm.. maybe that. if u happen to like these, well, e72.. but take notes, there are reports of the serious lag issue by e72

if want better camera, desire will give u better, with the flash. unlike captivate other than that, IMO captivate outperform desire in every corner, give it screen (superAMOLED vs S-LCD/AMOLED), processor (hummingbird proved to outperform snapdragon's scropion), screen size (4" vs 3.7"). but if u look for best build quality, desire pwns captivate cheap plastics

so, u choose

This post has been edited by wuwah: Feb 19 2011, 01:39 AM

base on your usage, W995 is better overall for entertainment phone. E72 is ok, but not really for entertainment. plus, its camera is IMO, below average but base on your budget, should be around 950+ right? u may want to try smartphones, as they got more apps for u to play with, and to maximise your phone. got plenty good android around that price, like LG optimus one

oh. then, for sure w995 is the best there more than that, usually touchscreen one d

really? hmm.. try ask LYN seller too, maybe they got stock btw, yeah. hazel also good. the body feel awesome on hands only let down, compared to W995 is it didn't comes with a 3.5mm headjack

I'd say, desire Z. for HTC's excellency built, software support milestone 2 take over desire z with its camera. and both sliding mechanism is different. milestone 2 got no spring mechanism, so, u need to push it all way up to slide it fully. for desire z, it isn't slide. it opens the keyboard. hard to explain, maybe if want to know more, u can have a look in youtube
looks like u want a phones with qwerty? if wait for dual core, u may have to wait longer for qwerty dual core to come out. u see, even now, android with qwerty isn't much available. dual core is good if u are heavy gamers IMO. if not, even 1Ghz is enough d. somemore, the battery size is larger, cause the price to higher.. u know, dual core is more power hunger

samsung galaxy 5, which equipped with android is the best there. nokia X3-02, well, symbian. not really a performer unlike android. wave575 is a good phone to be honest. good OS also. but bada still new. not much apps are available till now. so, if u want to bet on the future, wave575 lor. but make clear in mind, cuz a developing OS have 50-50 chance either to failed, or to standout in near future. so, if want apps now, lots of customization available till now, samsung galaxy5

depends on your usage style. customization, apps, web browsing, some different with other ppl, portable video; desireHD. as android strong point, customization, apps, web browsing. and not many users here in Malaysia for android for the phones itself, with bigger screen of 4.3" (lazy to google, correct me if I'm wrong), it is suitable for viewing plenty of video.

if prefer all multimedia, apps, err.. and some publicity maybe, iphone4.

apps wise, IMO, number of apps different is not matter for both. but, the popular apps for both are there available for both. and, both have horrible battery life for heavy usage. charge daily

camera wise, X10 mini is better. galaxy 5 camera very bad.both got same eclair. but X10 mini got SE's timescape and mediascape inside it. but the size of X10mini.. very2 small to me

it is the same as Aria. what's your budget? if possible, topup a bit la for AP desire. better, with bigger screen

what for? it depends on your usage. if u need the BIM, BBM from blackberry, get the 9300 if u prefer the look
if u want good android for apps, versatility, get DEFY

^garage sale got varies from 880 to 950..