I fail to understand how did auto cruise work for manual cars. Its ment for automatic transmission only as far as I know la.
but who knows right. Personally I dont really care for auto cruize = ) but thats me

This post has been edited by Evirober: Feb 13 2009, 12:04 PM

So only 2 colors for the satria CPS H-Line edition?

Haha you know what? I thinking the same thing too

It just keep the throttle cable at a preset position for the selected speed. But it will not be as good as in AT cars where it can auto downshift. In MT, once you pressed the brake, it will disengaged.

But I think its easier to put autocruise in Campro as it uses 'drive by wire' system.

This post has been edited by sphiroth: Feb 13 2009, 12:09 PM

only 2 colors apparently

black and white (type-R wannabe)?

LOL !!!

Travis you sure ?!?

---

Added on February 13, 2009, 12:10 pmsphiroth: Malu man if the car stall coz the rev drop too low.. LOL

This post has been edited by Evirober: Feb 13 2009, 12:10 PM

Front bumper curik MYVI S.E 1st model kaaaaaaa???

Apart from all the upgrades, it had also grown a bit weight by about 100kg..... making the acc 0-100km at 10.5sec for the 5MT...

Really suitable for Malaysian market; Looks comes first, performance second.

This post has been edited by ShinAsakura: Feb 13 2009, 12:45 PM

2.2k kg?

u serious?

whoops!!! looked wrongly, sorry haha!

Well kinda think of, i need a small but fun car, as i very bored with my myvi. Dont really need a saloon in the moment as my dad and bro has one. Hmm just temptation. Need to look at the car 1st

U mean 220kg? That hefty!

nice skirting, nice feature. look like nice handling.
kerb weight 1277 KG, wow very stable. honda civic 2.0 also 1200+ KG.

looks good. but typical for malaysian people

-bash first, bash again and again second, the only test drive-

I do not see having extra weight helps a small fun car like this. It will effected its dynamics and may restrain the engine more, also causing slighty higher FC if the engine is not powerful enough.

i would prefer the spoiler on the neo r3 than this.
this looks abit out of proportion, but have to see the real car to judge.

but safe to say, those hoping the neo cps to whoop a suzuki swift sport can only dream. almost heavier by 100kg.

satria neo cps and the old model neo using different chassis parts??? thats why its more heavy??? the brochure there write use high tensile steel thus twice as solid as before??

Look excellent on paper..

But real product needs evaluating..

Twice the tensile strength most likely they're comparing Neo and the mitsu based Satria. I don't think the extra power from the CPS warrants a stronger chassis compared to the non CPS variant.

so small car but so heavy??!!

my car kerb weight 1300kg only..

perhaps more stable ride ?

nice spoiler

The Satria Neo uses the same platform as the old Satria, mate...