NEO CPS Brochure
|
|
 Feb 13 2009, 10:43 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Senior Member
2,115 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Petaling Jaya  
|
QUOTE(kev da man @ Feb 13 2009, 10:34 AM) manual + autocruise? Don't laugh, man, I used to own a 1995 Satria 1.6 Manual that came standard with Autocruise control leh... does not compute! XD lets say you set at 80km/h. then you need to brake, does the car switch gears for you? i LOLed!   |
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 13 2009, 10:57 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member
2,115 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Petaling Jaya
|
QUOTE(kev da man @ Feb 13 2009, 10:55 AM) how long did your autocruise last? Interestingly, the Autocruise on my old Satria is STILL working!   besides, if your car has tons of low-end torque, you wont worry bout autocruising, just feather the pedal, the car is able to easily run up and down hills.   |
|
|
Feb 13 2009, 11:04 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member
2,115 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Petaling Jaya
|
QUOTE(kev da man @ Feb 13 2009, 11:00 AM) good for you then, then again, the reason why they probably did not include it in the manual version is to save cost, and the range of auto cruise speeds isn't really viable. Yeah, I know what U mean, man... Have you ever tried a manual car with autocruise? I gotta tell you, it gets pretty unnerving when it tries to accelerate up to the set velocity during a highway cruise... |
|
|
Feb 13 2009, 11:25 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member
2,115 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Petaling Jaya
|
QUOTE(Evirober @ Feb 13 2009, 11:20 AM) I have a question I hope some of you guys can help. I believe I has spotted 2 trailers of Proton CPS on the Subang Airport root. After looking at the brochure there is a mild difference that I spotted. The styling is the same however the cars that I saw had those GTI like allen key on the side flares. Is there a CPS variation is my question... If you look at the leaked brochure carefully, U can see those "Allen Key" on the wheel arches... |
|
|
Feb 13 2009, 02:17 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
Senior Member
2,115 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Petaling Jaya
|
QUOTE(roarus @ Feb 13 2009, 01:54 PM) Twice the tensile strength most likely they're comparing Neo and the mitsu based Satria. I don't think the extra power from the CPS warrants a stronger chassis compared to the non CPS variant. The Satria Neo uses the same platform as the old Satria, mate... |
|
|
Feb 13 2009, 02:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
|
Senior Member
2,115 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Petaling Jaya
|
QUOTE(zc_squash @ Feb 13 2009, 02:29 PM) But Paul Tan says it doesn't: QUOTE( PaulTan.org) The Proton Satria Neo is an all new platform developed from scratch. It is not based on the Waja/Gen2 chassis or the old Satria chassis. QUOTE(CooShyRee @ Feb 13 2009, 02:48 PM) i agree wit u.. Strange, 2 contradicting facts... According to Autocar Asean and Cars.My, the Satria Neo is based on the old Satria/Mitsu Colt platform... I am confused now... actually, kinda think of it, nearly 1300kg is kinda heavy 4 a small 2 door hatch like this which has not much equipments in it.. nope.. the staria neo is an all new platform actually..  |
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 13 2009, 03:48 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
|
Senior Member
2,115 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Petaling Jaya
|
QUOTE(CooShyRee @ Feb 13 2009, 03:06 PM) really?? ive read in couple of places b4 that proton developed a brand new platform 4 the neo.. QUOTE(kev da man @ Feb 13 2009, 03:16 PM) the neo itslef was based off the waja. and in the neo CPS, the chassis has been reinforced, hence higher kerb weight. OK, I'm even more confused now... |
|
|
Feb 13 2009, 04:46 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
|
Senior Member
2,115 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Petaling Jaya
|
QUOTE(moon* @ Feb 13 2009, 04:36 PM) i tink he was refering to the part; where by the design is taken from a 4dr waja chassis Yes, that's the part that got me even more confused... |
|
|
Feb 13 2009, 05:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
|
Senior Member
2,115 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Petaling Jaya
|
QUOTE(kev da man @ Feb 13 2009, 04:46 PM) well, you see the orange color text? click the url la XD moon, not the design, but parts of the platform was adapted from the waja. QUOTE(moon* @ Feb 13 2009, 04:50 PM) lol.. tats y he confused lo. Actually, no, I was confused about the parts of the platform coming from the Waja, not the design from the Waja... I got confused becoz I read from 2 mags saying that the Satria Neo was based on the Mitsu Colt platform... I could've remembered wrongly, I'll go back and check those mags again...i m guessing he thought the design or something like tat is from the waja Anyway, the Waja is based on the Mitsu Charisma/Lancer platform... |
|
|
Feb 13 2009, 05:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
|
Senior Member
2,115 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Petaling Jaya
|
QUOTE(kev da man @ Feb 13 2009, 05:11 PM) lmao XD LOL... Cool, kev, thanks for the clarification... vanquish, even if it was based on the colt, it would be the new colt, but i do not remember the neo has the same underpinnings as a smart forfour.... (colt and forfour has same floorpan and basic chassis) proton designed the neo from ground up with some technologies borrowed from the waja, and it could be anything as no one has no clue unless you talk to a proton engineer, so relax la, the neo has an updated chassis for the millennium XD |
| Change to: |  0.0197sec
 0.36
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 8th December 2025 - 02:48 PM |
Quote