Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
2 x 2gb 800mhz @ 4-4-3-8-11, vs 1x2gb 1066mhz @ 5-5-5-15-24
|
TSBuckRoger
|
Feb 11 2009, 01:21 PM, updated 17y ago
|
|
I have 2 pair of ram & i want to let go 1 pair. Wanna check with u guys which is better??
1. 2 x 2gb running at 800mhz @ 4-4-3-8-11-2T
2. 2 x 1gb running at 1066mhz @ 5-5-5-15-24-2T
really appreciate ur reply,
thanks..
|
|
|
|
|
|
mantiz125
|
Feb 11 2009, 01:24 PM
|
|
if you're running XP.. than 2GB is sufficient...
if me.. I would take 2GB 1066MHz.... especially if i'm using AMD system...
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSBuckRoger
|
Feb 11 2009, 01:28 PM
|
|
QUOTE(mantiz125 @ Feb 11 2009, 01:24 PM) if you're running XP.. than 2GB is sufficient... if me.. I would take 2GB 1066MHz.... especially if i'm using AMD system... thanks, im running on Vista.... actually my questions is which is better, the low CL or the higher speed?
|
|
|
|
|
|
-pWs-
|
Feb 11 2009, 01:41 PM
|
Look at all my stars!!
|
Since you hav 2 pairs of them, why dont you benchmark them? -pWs-
|
|
|
|
|
|
ah_khoo
|
Feb 11 2009, 01:52 PM
|
- No Action Talk Only -
|
i think 4-4-3-8 @ 800 has an edge over 1066 @ 5-5-5-15.
|
|
|
|
|
|
iBenQ
|
Feb 11 2009, 02:24 PM
|
|
i'd vote for 1066 5-5-5-15
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSBuckRoger
|
Feb 11 2009, 02:35 PM
|
|
QUOTE(-pWs- @ Feb 11 2009, 01:41 PM) Since you hav 2 pairs of them, why dont you benchmark them? -pWs-err.. how to do benchmark  sorry noob here
|
|
|
|
|
|
^KamilskaZ^
|
Feb 11 2009, 02:53 PM
|
|
vote for 4-4-3-8@800.less load
|
|
|
|
|
|
-pWs-
|
Feb 11 2009, 02:58 PM
|
Look at all my stars!!
|
QUOTE(BuckRoger @ Feb 11 2009, 02:35 PM) err.. how to do benchmark  sorry noob here  Eg: Everest Memory Benchmark. -pWs-
|
|
|
|
|
|
AceCombat
|
Feb 11 2009, 05:09 PM
|
|
sorry but guys,i dont vote for either timing or speed. i vote for capacity  can u really feel 4-4-3-8 and 5-5-5-15? can u really feel 800 and 1066? well i dont but i can feel 2x1GB and 2x2GB.
|
|
|
|
|
|
iBenQ
|
Feb 11 2009, 06:41 PM
|
|
QUOTE(AceCombat @ Feb 11 2009, 05:09 PM) sorry but guys,i dont vote for either timing or speed. i vote for capacity  can u really feel 4-4-3-8 and 5-5-5-15? can u really feel 800 and 1066? well i dont but i can feel 2x1GB and 2x2GB. not reli and like u said, 2x1gb and 2x2gb is noticable, more if u turn off pagefile and fully use rams
|
|
|
|
|
|
presto86
|
Feb 11 2009, 06:49 PM
|
Getting Started

|
If u r using AMD, go for the timings. If you are using intel, go for FSB/RAM Speed. Just my 2 cents =P
|
|
|
|
|
|
bryanyeo87
|
Feb 11 2009, 06:53 PM
|
|
OCU is not your personal army to ask which kit to let go. Go and benchmark your rams using everest bandwidth test or memtest86 or even sandra then decide which to let go,
//Moved to Hardware Q&A
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSBuckRoger
|
Feb 11 2009, 06:56 PM
|
|
QUOTE(bryanyeo87 @ Feb 11 2009, 06:53 PM) OCU is not your personal army to ask which kit to let go. Go and benchmark your rams using everest bandwidth test or memtest86 or even sandra then decide which to let go, //Moved to Hardware Q&A why so serious  .. just wanna check which is the best ram i should hold
|
|
|
|
|
|
monsh
|
Feb 11 2009, 08:17 PM
|
|
i'd vote for 2x2gb n OC them till around 1066 oso can maa ^^, haha
|
|
|
|
|
|
shaun3230
|
Feb 11 2009, 09:10 PM
|
|
4-4-3-8 would be real sweet even if its 800 as in DDR2 rams, timings affect the performance more than freqs (in benchies that is)
|
|
|
|
|
|
xixo_12
|
Feb 11 2009, 11:00 PM
|
|
i demand for benchmark by urself
|
|
|
|
|