QUOTE
If more than 1 technologies are competing for the same end user / purpose, then you can indeed label which one are more superior / advance in terms of meeting the purpose / end users needs.
Personally, I think it is too early to select a winner in this particular category (plasma vs LCD), and the winner tag itself is not without dispute. A technology can be a winner in quality repoduction but a loser in survival.
LCD is gainning popularity even plasma produces better PQ. Bear in mind that the best technology does not always wins.
Personally, I think it is too early to select a winner in this particular category (plasma vs LCD), and the winner tag itself is not without dispute. A technology can be a winner in quality repoduction but a loser in survival.
LCD is gainning popularity even plasma produces better PQ. Bear in mind that the best technology does not always wins.
I can think one possible reason why LCD is gaining in popularity - PRICE.
Heck, u can own a descent LCD for less tha rm1.5k. And also i think the mass is more "exposed" to the term LCD - pc monitor, car stereo monitor, lcd watch,etc.., whereas when it come to "plasma" only a "few" realised that it still offer a better PQ and value for many...
I've seen sony W/Z series, the sammy 6,7 and even the new LED 9 series. All being 40inher and above. It just didnt catch my heart (and brain) to spend my money on a "less supiror PQ" - regardless of the source fed into it..
Honestly i think (atleast my eyes do..) the PQ of old panny pv70/pv80 still miles away from LCD PQ...
Apr 21 2009, 06:25 PM
Quote
0.0236sec
0.58
7 queries
GZIP Disabled