Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
124 Pages « < 43 44 45 46 47 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography {▀} Panasonic Leica LX-3 King of the King: V2 {▀}, ▇ Ultimate F2.0 24mm Manual Digicam ▇

views
     
Uzumaki NaruTo
post Apr 5 2009, 11:05 PM

oro?
*******
Senior Member
4,187 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: sleepy melati



QUOTE(barteria @ Apr 5 2009, 10:40 PM)
ok. i think im experiencing the same thing here. too much noise when taking pic at dark places/during night time. tried to adjust the iso/apperture/exposure and even when i use the iA mode still same, noisy pic. how how how? sifus help? uzumaki naruto, how do u take those pic at dark places got no noise, mind to share?
*
Use manual mode. Its bit overwhelming at first but after practicing it you will be more comfortable using it. The trick is to balance the holy three (iso / apature / exposure) . Heres a simplified description for each of the attribute.

iso : high - picture becomes noisy but able to shoot in the dark
low - picture become less needs high number of exposure, low aperture (f/2.0) to compensate more lights

exposure : high - needs a very, very steady hand or tripod
low - no need steady hand (at rate of 1/60) anything lower than that needs a steady hand but have to increase iso / low aperture

aperture : high - less light comes in ; creates a depth of fields (aka bokeh)
low - more light comes in; image looks flat.

For this image here's my configuration

user posted image

Exposure : 0.8 (needs a tripod or steady arm)
Aperture : f/2.0 (means more light)
Focal Length : 5.1 mm
ISO Speed : 80 (image with less noise)
Mr.LKM
post Apr 6 2009, 12:11 AM

Astronomy Enthusiast
*******
Senior Member
3,749 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Johor



Hmm.. I think high aperture allows less light to impact on the CCD as well as a deep depth of field. Is bokeh equal to shallow depth of field?
Uzumaki NaruTo
post Apr 6 2009, 12:28 AM

oro?
*******
Senior Member
4,187 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: sleepy melati



QUOTE(Mr.LKM @ Apr 6 2009, 12:11 AM)
Hmm.. I think high aperture allows less light to impact on the CCD as well as a deep depth of field. Is bokeh equal to shallow depth of field?
*
high aperture means lower f-stop number meaning f/2.0. this will allow more light to come in. lower aperture means the number are bigger (f/5.0) means less light will come in.

QUOTE
One thing that causes a lot of new photographers confusion is that large apertures (where lots of light gets through) are given f/stop smaller numbers and smaller apertures (where less light gets through) have larger f-stop numbers. So f/2.8 is in fact a much larger aperture than f/22. It seems the wrong way around when you first hear it but you’ll get the hang of it.
yes bokeh is equal to shallow depth of field due to the lower aperture setting.

QUOTE
Aperture has a big impact upon depth of field. Large aperture (remember it’s a smaller number) will decrease depth of field while small aperture (larger numbers) will give you larger depth of field.
Read more: Introduction to Aperture in Digital Photography - http://digital-photography-school.com/aperture

To help visualize the relation of large apertures and low apertures here's a simple diagram to understand it.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...ure_diagram.svg

This post has been edited by Uzumaki NaruTo: Apr 6 2009, 12:31 AM
PCHo
post Apr 6 2009, 08:04 AM

...Otherwise known as Kevin Ho...
******
Senior Member
1,246 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: JB


QUOTE(Mr.LKM @ Apr 6 2009, 12:11 AM)
Hmm.. I think high aperture allows less light to impact on the CCD as well as a deep depth of field. Is bokeh equal to shallow depth of field?
*
This term is a very misleading one.
Aperture = size of the shutter opening.
So a big aperture @ small F number (f/2.0) leads to smaller depth of field @ more bokeh.
Small aperture @ high F number (f/8.0) leads to higher depth of field @ less bokeh.
Just remember that for aperture, the rules are always reversed compared to the "number" we r seeing n using.
Even I still get this mixed up sometimes when discussing with frens.
sweat.gif
laichong
post Apr 6 2009, 08:54 AM

Da Da Da Da Da
*****
Senior Member
900 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Somewhere over the rainbow


QUOTE(PCHo @ Apr 6 2009, 08:04 AM)
This term is a very misleading one.
Aperture = size of the shutter opening.
So a big aperture @ small F number (f/2.0) leads to smaller depth of field @ more bokeh.
Small aperture @ high F number (f/8.0) leads to higher depth of field @ less bokeh.
Just remember that for aperture, the rules are always reversed compared to the "number" we r seeing n using.
Even I still get this mixed up sometimes when discussing with frens.
sweat.gif
*
so, can i translate it as,

F/2.0 = blur background
F/8.0 = clear background

?? unsure.gif
Uzumaki NaruTo
post Apr 6 2009, 10:06 AM

oro?
*******
Senior Member
4,187 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: sleepy melati



QUOTE(laichong @ Apr 6 2009, 08:54 AM)
so, can i translate it as,

F/2.0 = blur background
F/8.0 = clear background

?? unsure.gif
*
still terbalik.

F/2.0 - clear
F/8.0 - blur

This one i just hentam hotlink if out get it from wikipedia entry ya
user posted image

the blob represents how much light comes in. the smaller the number , more lights will come it and the the depth of fields (bokehness) is lesser
the bigger the number the less light will comes in thus creating a deeper depth of fields (bokeh/blur)

This post has been edited by Uzumaki NaruTo: Apr 6 2009, 10:11 AM
uranverein
post Apr 6 2009, 10:10 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
54 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
From: KL
QUOTE(Uzumaki NaruTo @ Apr 6 2009, 10:06 AM)
still terbalik.

F/2.0 - clear
F/8.0 - blur
*
according to this

So a big aperture @ small F number (f/2.0) leads to smaller depth of field @ more bokeh.
Small aperture @ high F number (f/8.0) leads to higher depth of field @ less bokeh.

how come it's terbalik ?

edit: i assumed laichong is talking about background

This post has been edited by uranverein: Apr 6 2009, 10:11 AM
Uzumaki NaruTo
post Apr 6 2009, 10:23 AM

oro?
*******
Senior Member
4,187 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: sleepy melati



QUOTE(uranverein @ Apr 6 2009, 10:10 AM)
according to this

So a big aperture @ small F number (f/2.0) leads to smaller depth of field @ more bokeh.
Small aperture @ high F number (f/8.0) leads to higher depth of field @ less bokeh.

how come it's terbalik ?

edit: i assumed laichong is talking about background
*
haha i think im the terbalik one rclxub.gif .Sorry for the mistake notworthy.gif

laugh.gif

This post has been edited by Uzumaki NaruTo: Apr 6 2009, 10:31 AM
barteria
post Apr 6 2009, 11:15 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
299 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
From: Cyberjaya


QUOTE(Uzumaki NaruTo @ Apr 5 2009, 11:05 PM)
Use manual mode. Its bit overwhelming at first but after practicing it you will be more comfortable using it. The trick is to balance the holy three (iso / apature / exposure) . Heres a simplified description for each of the attribute.

iso : high - picture becomes noisy but able to shoot in the dark
        low -  picture become  less needs high number of exposure, low aperture (f/2.0) to compensate more lights

exposure : high - needs a very, very steady hand or tripod
                 low - no need steady hand (at rate of 1/60) anything lower than that needs a steady hand but have to increase iso / low aperture

aperture : high - less light comes in ; creates a depth of fields (aka bokeh)
                low -  more light comes in; image looks flat.

For this image here's my configuration

user posted image

Exposure       :   0.8 (needs a tripod or steady arm)
Aperture        :  f/2.0 (means more light)
Focal Length   :  5.1 mm
ISO Speed     :  80 (image with less noise)
*
thank you! i tried to use ur setting and it works! thanks a lot. now i know the trick. will save this setting in one of my manual setting. easier next time no need to set2 anymore.

but i have a question. according to http://digital-photography-school.com/aperture , it says that small apperture (large number) creates more Depth of Field. as far as i know, smaller apperture (large number) = less light into cam. so, wont the pic be quite dark n gloomy especially during night time/dark places when the shots are taken?

This post has been edited by barteria: Apr 6 2009, 12:00 PM
Mr.LKM
post Apr 6 2009, 11:55 AM

Astronomy Enthusiast
*******
Senior Member
3,749 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Johor



QUOTE(Uzumaki NaruTo @ Apr 6 2009, 10:23 AM)
haha i think im the terbalik one rclxub.gif .Sorry for the mistake notworthy.gif

laugh.gif
*
Hahaha.. that was my point. biggrin.gif
Uzumaki NaruTo
post Apr 6 2009, 12:16 PM

oro?
*******
Senior Member
4,187 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: sleepy melati



QUOTE(barteria @ Apr 6 2009, 11:15 AM)
thank you! i tried to use ur setting and it works! thanks a lot. now i know the trick. will save this setting in one of my manual setting. easier next time no need to set2 anymore.
*
Ahaks glad it worked for you. But try to play around with the settings. lurk more around flickr and see their meta data (if possible) Thats the best way to learn in photography. Each settings needs to cater certain environment. I am also into street photography so i dont usually have the leisure of setting up tripods and long exposure.

Well there's a cheat code to a cleaner image but still using high iso. You can use Imagenomic's Noiseware to clean up noises generated by high iso.

user posted image
Original Size

This picture is taken with iso 400 but a quick whip at Noiseware will drastically reduced the noises.

This post has been edited by Uzumaki NaruTo: Apr 6 2009, 12:32 PM
barteria
post Apr 6 2009, 12:25 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
299 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
From: Cyberjaya


QUOTE(Uzumaki NaruTo @ Apr 6 2009, 12:16 PM)
Ahaks glad it worked for you. But try to play around with the settings. lurk more around flickr and see their meta data (if possible) Thats the best way to learn in photography.
*
thanks for the tips thumbup.gif
uranverein
post Apr 6 2009, 12:29 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
54 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
From: KL
@barteria

i guess for low lighting it is advisable not to use f8.0 etc unless ur expose time is long, correct ?

im still learning day by day, thanks to u guys smile.gif
rawn
post Apr 6 2009, 01:45 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
148 posts

Joined: Aug 2008


hey guys, am looking for a compatible external flash for my LX3.

a friend of mine told me to get from Nikon or Sigma due to their reputation. i'm not really sure of my budget as of now.

i need some suggestion and pointers here.
barteria
post Apr 6 2009, 01:52 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
299 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
From: Cyberjaya


QUOTE(uranverein @ Apr 6 2009, 12:29 PM)
@barteria

i guess for low lighting it is advisable not to use f8.0 etc unless ur expose time is long, correct ?

im still learning day by day, thanks to u guys smile.gif
*
wut do u mean by expose time is long? sorry, im noob tongue.gif
laichong
post Apr 6 2009, 03:04 PM

Da Da Da Da Da
*****
Senior Member
900 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Somewhere over the rainbow


QUOTE(barteria @ Apr 6 2009, 01:52 PM)
wut do u mean by expose time is long? sorry, im noob  tongue.gif
*
exposure time is your shutter open/closing speed. it can be 1/200sec, 1/100sec, 1/80sec,1/20sec, 1sec, 2 sec and alot more...
u can set this in manually using the stick (same as how u adjust the aperture F/stop).
the longer the shutter open time(sec), more light will go through....
barteria
post Apr 6 2009, 03:11 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
299 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
From: Cyberjaya


QUOTE(laichong @ Apr 6 2009, 03:04 PM)
exposure time is your shutter open/closing speed. it can be 1/200sec, 1/100sec, 1/80sec,1/20sec, 1sec, 2 sec and alot more...
u can set this in manually using the stick (same as how u adjust the aperture F/stop).
the longer the shutter open time(sec), more light will go through....
*
oh, ure talking abt the shutter spee. ic ic. if its the shutter speed i know la. never know ppl call it exposure time too. learned something new again. i just love this forum. rclxm9.gif
Kenvess
post Apr 6 2009, 03:20 PM

VIP Dream ビップドリイーム
****
Senior Member
620 posts

Joined: May 2008


Leica Lens expensive?? coz hear some ppl said this kind lens so expensive d? but im not sure la laugh.gif
barteria
post Apr 6 2009, 03:33 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
299 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
From: Cyberjaya


QUOTE(Kenvess @ Apr 6 2009, 03:20 PM)
Leica Lens expensive?? coz hear some ppl said this kind lens so expensive d? but im not sure la laugh.gif
*
of course it is. google any leica lens and see for urself. enough said brows.gif


Added on April 6, 2009, 3:43 pmgus, i found this. kinda cheap. u think they do postage to here in malaysia?

http://www.pinoyphotography.org/forum/inde...p?topic=39483.0

calculated the price for all 3 lenses. only around 520 and 991 for all lens+set-up ring+case+hotshoe cover+ricoh lc1 without any tax+postage cost.

This post has been edited by barteria: Apr 6 2009, 03:50 PM
laichong
post Apr 6 2009, 03:54 PM

Da Da Da Da Da
*****
Senior Member
900 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Somewhere over the rainbow


QUOTE(barteria @ Apr 6 2009, 03:33 PM)
of course it is. google any leica lens and see for urself. enough said  brows.gif


Added on April 6, 2009, 3:43 pmgus, i found this. kinda cheap. u think they do postage to here in malaysia?

http://www.pinoyphotography.org/forum/inde...p?topic=39483.0

calculated the price for all 3 lenses. only around 520 without any tax+postage cost.
*
that could be the "Pandabase" Tube. the seller Fotobestbuy is from HK and had advertised in ebay.com
i'd purchased my tube+uv filter+hood+lens cap from him yesterday, now waiting the parcel to reach.

124 Pages « < 43 44 45 46 47 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0280sec    0.87    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 19th December 2025 - 09:36 PM