13k for e55
that is abit high right
DB9 only 15k
Supercars & Exotics III
Supercars & Exotics III
|
|
Mar 11 2009, 04:29 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
484 posts Joined: Nov 2008 |
13k for e55
that is abit high right DB9 only 15k |
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 11 2009, 04:41 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
81 posts Joined: May 2008 |
Robindebean & Shanthan60...maybe next time you guys should do a little more research first before making a statement.
This post has been edited by SSS: Mar 11 2009, 04:42 PM |
|
|
Mar 11 2009, 05:43 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
2 posts Joined: Mar 2009 From: penang |
he right though... an e55 wud b 13k... its nt the type of car u drive... its the capacity of ur engine, so if a 6.0l costs around 15k... the 5.5l must be around that too...
Added on March 11, 2009, 5:45 pmps if u dnt believe me go to this site http://www.autoworld.com.my/tools/roadtax.asp itll calc ur rd tax for the capacity of ur engine This post has been edited by jeffreyb1004: Mar 11 2009, 05:45 PM |
|
|
Mar 11 2009, 09:55 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
1 posts Joined: Jan 2009 |
ok then sorry for that info
|
|
|
Mar 11 2009, 09:59 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
484 posts Joined: Nov 2008 |
hmmm....i didnt know e55 running on 5.5l
hehehe |
|
|
Mar 11 2009, 10:41 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,215 posts Joined: Oct 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 11 2009, 11:23 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,384 posts Joined: Aug 2006 From: 60.52.185.91 |
![]() Added on March 11, 2009, 11:23 pm ![]() This post has been edited by benzene88: Mar 11 2009, 11:23 PM |
|
|
Mar 11 2009, 11:59 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
716 posts Joined: Jan 2009 From: GPG Industries China |
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « very nice shot bro |
|
|
Mar 12 2009, 10:24 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
13,790 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: stress & confuse world |
|
|
|
Mar 12 2009, 10:32 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
262 posts Joined: Nov 2006 |
|
|
|
Mar 12 2009, 11:24 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
235 posts Joined: Mar 2008 |
|
|
|
Mar 12 2009, 11:37 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,077 posts Joined: Jul 2007 |
QUOTE(jehutyz @ Mar 11 2009, 10:41 PM) Yup Merc and BMW, the number present the the engine capacity. 55 doesn't mean 5.5. The 55 cars have supercharged 5.4 V8s.See the 600 (S600, CL600, SL600)? Not all of them have 6.0 V12s. Take this as an example, the R129 SL600, it had a naturally aspirated 6.0 V12, but the successor, the R230 SL600, had a lower engine capacity with only 5.5 litres, but boosted by biturbos. Currently, all 600 badged models share twin-turbocharged 5.5s. The 65 AMG models, such as SL65, CL65, S65, CLS65, etc., uses a 6.0, but has the biturbo. A few examples - B/C/E/200 - 1.8; three variants - NA, Turbo (B200), Kompressor C/E/CLK/SLK/230 - 2.3; NA (older), mostly Kompressor. Some C230s are 1.8s (Supercharged), some are V6s. Currently, if I'm not mistaken, the 3.5 (350) is the only engine that is being used by the all/most of the models. |
|
|
Mar 12 2009, 11:44 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
262 posts Joined: Nov 2006 |
The badge behind a car isn't indicative of engine capacity, but is more a marketing tool to differentiate between tune, trim and price levels of cars within a model range.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 12 2009, 11:51 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,077 posts Joined: Jul 2007 |
QUOTE(myghimh @ Mar 12 2009, 11:24 AM) guess wad car is this? Guess for what? Isn't it obvious?» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Anyhow it doesn't belong in this thread. Sorry. |
|
|
Mar 12 2009, 02:13 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,215 posts Joined: Oct 2005 |
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Noted. Did ask Roland San for this. Thanks. This post has been edited by jehutyz: Mar 12 2009, 02:13 PM |
|
|
Mar 12 2009, 08:07 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
2 posts Joined: Mar 2009 From: penang |
QUOTE(UE7 @ Mar 12 2009, 11:37 AM) 55 doesn't mean 5.5. The 55 cars have supercharged 5.4 V8s. im sorry but how big of an anorak do you have to be...See the 600 (S600, CL600, SL600)? Not all of them have 6.0 V12s. Take this as an example, the R129 SL600, it had a naturally aspirated 6.0 V12, but the successor, the R230 SL600, had a lower engine capacity with only 5.5 litres, but boosted by biturbos. Currently, all 600 badged models share twin-turbocharged 5.5s. The 65 AMG models, such as SL65, CL65, S65, CLS65, etc., uses a 6.0, but has the biturbo. A few examples - B/C/E/200 - 1.8; three variants - NA, Turbo (B200), Kompressor C/E/CLK/SLK/230 - 2.3; NA (older), mostly Kompressor. Some C230s are 1.8s (Supercharged), some are V6s. Currently, if I'm not mistaken, the 3.5 (350) is the only engine that is being used by the all/most of the models. it is a rough guide line... so infact there is notins wrong with the statements made b4, as it does somewhat denote the number of liters of the car. now as a known fact mercedes always(since their early years, and as a bit of a tradition) made the model no of their cars 200 cc less as a way of being subtle and modest for the higher classes. as you can see by the e280 which i had, it had a 2998cc engine, 3 liters so yea, ITS JUST A GUIDELINE PPL... Added on March 12, 2009, 8:44 pm QUOTE(Roland San @ Mar 12 2009, 11:44 AM) The badge behind a car isn't indicative of engine capacity, but is more a marketing tool to differentiate between tune, trim and price levels of cars within a model range. sorry for the rant... but this is prob the best description, but as quoted is kinda wrong as it does give some indication to how big the engine is...This post has been edited by jeffreyb1004: Mar 12 2009, 08:44 PM |
|
|
Mar 12 2009, 09:22 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
90 posts Joined: Sep 2006 |
QUOTE(jeffreyb1004 @ Mar 12 2009, 08:07 PM) im sorry but how big of an anorak do you have to be... it is a rough guide line... so infact there is notins wrong with the statements made b4, as it does somewhat denote the number of liters of the car. now as a known fact mercedes always(since their early years, and as a bit of a tradition) made the model no of their cars 200 cc less as a way of being subtle and modest for the higher classes. as you can see by the e280 which i had, it had a 2998cc engine, 3 liters so yea, ITS JUST A GUIDELINE PPL... This post has been edited by alskar: Mar 12 2009, 09:25 PM |
|
|
Mar 12 2009, 09:37 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
769 posts Joined: Mar 2005 From: Everywhere |
it used to be, but not anymore... nowdays its all about them turbo's... but they still retain the same digits... and lets be honest, SL65 AMG sounds way better than SL60 AMG, am i right?
|
|
|
Mar 13 2009, 10:40 AM
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Feb 2009 |
QUOTE(almattitude_v1 @ Mar 12 2009, 09:37 PM) it used to be, but not anymore... nowdays its all about them turbo's... but they still retain the same digits... and lets be honest, SL65 AMG sounds way better than SL60 AMG, am i right? Is there a SL 60? Sorry guys, I've know of the SL55 and the SL63, but I've never heard of an SL60... |
|
|
Mar 13 2009, 11:04 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,215 posts Joined: Oct 2005 |
QUOTE(IvanDass @ Mar 13 2009, 10:40 AM) Is there a SL 60? Sorry guys, I've know of the SL55 and the SL63, but I've never heard of an SL60... I checked in wikipedia for Merc SL-Class. There is SL 60.QUOTE The SL60 AMG was also extremely rare. Sold through MB from 1996 to 1998, it used a 6.0 litre V8 engine. |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0350sec
0.60
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 12th December 2025 - 08:36 PM |