my choice WMP11...
This post has been edited by gac: Oct 16 2008, 11:50 PM
PC Audio foobar2k Q&A, Guides, help & comments are welcome...
|
|
Oct 16 2008, 11:49 PM
Return to original view | Post
#21
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,205 posts Joined: Aug 2007 From: In the heart of Kuala Lumpur |
all this are rather self preferences.... u like it u have it, dont like dont use it..... simple
my choice WMP11... This post has been edited by gac: Oct 16 2008, 11:50 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 17 2008, 12:57 AM
Return to original view | Post
#22
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,205 posts Joined: Aug 2007 From: In the heart of Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(BCurve @ Oct 17 2008, 12:24 AM) well well..... u got me.but i mean the problems of those faced NOT mine.... btw... what is the Impulse response convolver for? in layman term please This post has been edited by gac: Oct 17 2008, 01:39 AM |
|
|
Oct 18 2008, 12:08 AM
Return to original view | Post
#23
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,205 posts Joined: Aug 2007 From: In the heart of Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(CLF @ Oct 17 2008, 11:24 PM) How frequency you guys usually put for Resampler? i use Secred Rabbit Code as the resampler... i set to 96KHz merely because my sound card could support it. u can try setting it to different stages and see what is outcome.... happy trying.I usually stick with 48kHz, but most songs are in 44.1kHz. Will it sounds better in higher freq? I prefer 48kHz as the treble is clearer than 44.1kHz. Also, how much % you guys use for noise sharpening? 150% sounds good to me. What's you guys' suggestion? Btw I'm usually hear either from laptop speaker or EP-630.. |
|
|
Oct 18 2008, 01:46 AM
Return to original view | Post
#24
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,205 posts Joined: Aug 2007 From: In the heart of Kuala Lumpur |
|
|
|
Oct 18 2008, 02:48 AM
Return to original view | Post
#25
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,205 posts Joined: Aug 2007 From: In the heart of Kuala Lumpur |
|
|
|
Oct 18 2008, 03:50 AM
Return to original view | Post
#26
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,205 posts Joined: Aug 2007 From: In the heart of Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(jerren @ Oct 18 2008, 03:29 AM) noise sharpening is kinda useful when using with some speaker.. True, Z5500 is not meant for music.i do use it when im still hv Z5500, coz z5500's high is not so good in music, hv to use noise sharpening to boost up a bit.. but i use coxial (digital output) to z5500 from my x-fi platinum fatality champion series. listening in stereo mode. it was amazing out of my expectation... clarity, detailing, projection was good! |
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 18 2008, 04:39 AM
Return to original view | Post
#27
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,205 posts Joined: Aug 2007 From: In the heart of Kuala Lumpur |
|
|
|
Oct 18 2008, 12:23 PM
Return to original view | Post
#28
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,205 posts Joined: Aug 2007 From: In the heart of Kuala Lumpur |
|
|
|
Oct 18 2008, 03:40 PM
Return to original view | Post
#29
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,205 posts Joined: Aug 2007 From: In the heart of Kuala Lumpur |
|
|
|
Oct 18 2008, 11:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#30
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,205 posts Joined: Aug 2007 From: In the heart of Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(Angel of Deth @ Oct 18 2008, 10:42 PM) If you want to Resample, better use SSRC resampler...the best of resample. Strongly suggest by all foobar2000 expert user!!! i thought Secret Rabbit Code is the best??? SSRC resampler |
|
|
Oct 18 2008, 11:48 PM
Return to original view | Post
#31
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,205 posts Joined: Aug 2007 From: In the heart of Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(Angel of Deth @ Oct 18 2008, 11:36 PM) No..you try SSRC first and you will know the difference... in laymen terms.... if your sound card could not produce 192Khz, what do u expect?? I have 1 question to all SSRC user...i used the 192k sample rate with ultra quality setting..but i realized 48k sample rate give more clarity and treble. What is happening?? Doesn't the higher sample rate mean higher quality and clarity?? then u should try SRC.... This post has been edited by gac: Oct 18 2008, 11:49 PM |
|
|
Oct 19 2008, 12:12 AM
Return to original view | Post
#32
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,205 posts Joined: Aug 2007 From: In the heart of Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(Angel of Deth @ Oct 18 2008, 11:59 PM) Is that so? btw if my sound card not support 192Khz playback, the song will stutter just like when i using SRC with 192Khz sample rate..but with SSRC the song play just over-sampling eating up your resources and produce less ... what for? right? fine on 192Khz but less clarity than the original 44.1Khz and 48Khz..I think oversampling does not produce any good. What do u think? FYI i only use onboard cheap AL888...sound card is very expensive you know for foobar2k, i only stick to 96khz.... despite my sound card can support 24bit/192khz in stereo mode.... |
|
|
Oct 19 2008, 12:18 AM
Return to original view | Post
#33
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,205 posts Joined: Aug 2007 From: In the heart of Kuala Lumpur |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 19 2008, 12:32 AM
Return to original view | Post
#34
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,205 posts Joined: Aug 2007 From: In the heart of Kuala Lumpur |
i bought it at RM900. i m not sure about realtek al888... sorry
but no point buying x-fi, maybe u could try out ASUS XONAR and there is a new sc coming up.... |
|
|
Oct 19 2008, 02:01 AM
Return to original view | Post
#35
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,205 posts Joined: Aug 2007 From: In the heart of Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(Angel of Deth @ Oct 19 2008, 01:07 AM) Is it good for music??Actually i dont like my foobar with many DSP plugin coz i think they all fake...the original and good quality sound only produced by the soundcard, not the audio enhancer or plug-in. X-fi mainly design for gamers? but i do enjoy listening to all my audiophile CDs with WMP..... its fantastic!!! |
|
|
Oct 20 2008, 12:30 AM
Return to original view | Post
#36
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,205 posts Joined: Aug 2007 From: In the heart of Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(jerren @ Oct 19 2008, 05:34 AM) actually music should stick with 44.1khz since the source is 44.1.. well, everyone hear music differently. resampling will "not downgrade" the originality of the music. 44.1, 48, 192 do hv different projection of sound in terms of clarity but not very noticeable.. i do believe that get as original as possible is what audiophiles seek for.. for my setup the 44.1/48Khz and 96Khz is totally noticeable "maybe" this could be the different, i don't listen to lossless or lossy format. I only listen to so-called 24bit/192khz remastering CDs or imported CDs. just my 2cent cheers! |
|
|
Oct 20 2008, 01:37 AM
Return to original view | Post
#37
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,205 posts Joined: Aug 2007 From: In the heart of Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(andrekua @ Oct 20 2008, 12:39 AM) Not placebo. u r right... again its all depends on your hardware, software as well as your source It does sound different. I too have tested 96KHz 24bit. Somehow it sound different from 24bit 48KHz. The difference is very subtle, it make it sound a little bit airy. Vocal and instruments are all the same. White noise due to resampling again? Who knows... |
|
|
Oct 21 2008, 08:46 AM
Return to original view | Post
#38
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,205 posts Joined: Aug 2007 From: In the heart of Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(Dry Pillow @ Oct 20 2008, 02:47 PM) Honestly I did that, not making fun of anyone instead. So that's what placebo is, a change that scientifically unfounded but we want to believe there is. whether is placebo or placedo or placeto effect Resampling from 44.1khz to 96khz gives me the almost same experience when I did ABX on comparison between 192kbps and 320kbps. When the first time I tried this resampling, I didn't expect at all there'll be an improvement. However to my surprise, there's an improvement. Just like when I felt there's improvement when moving from 128kbps to 320kbps 1) i do feel the significant improvement when higher resampling. (maybe there is number of factors resulting to this, who cares!) 2) sources are important... there are different between lossless, lossy etc kinda formats. forget about all those technical knowledge or bundle theory .... as long as i can feel the improvement or betterment, that is! whether my mind lied to myself or the machines lies to me, its not important. if u want to find out.... come to my house and do whatever "test" and i will prove incorrectness of all those statements. cheers!!! This post has been edited by gac: Oct 21 2008, 12:34 PM |
|
|
Oct 21 2008, 12:39 PM
Return to original view | Post
#39
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,205 posts Joined: Aug 2007 From: In the heart of Kuala Lumpur |
technical issues & theory is good to know. no one prove it could be better or on the other hand nobody proves it is bad....
your ownself experiment is trusted. even a sophisicated machine can tested and prove my system is bad but as long as i like it will do. i just bought an expensive hifi system.... and i prefer both ok guys lets go back to FOOBAR2000 issues...... This post has been edited by gac: Oct 21 2008, 12:43 PM |
|
|
Oct 21 2008, 01:09 PM
Return to original view | Post
#40
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,205 posts Joined: Aug 2007 From: In the heart of Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(Dry Pillow @ Oct 21 2008, 01:01 PM) Good, now let us all move up one higher and more serious level of foobar2k discussion. This time we talk about skin customization... kidding only la skin customization ... no no no in newer version right? i m using 9.5.6.0...... i think anything beyond 9.5.3.0 u cant mod. Beside the resampling, are there any DSP or Output plugins that can slightly improve clarity? I starve for crystal clear sound clarity of all instruments played in every songs. I said 'slightly' improve because I do realize that software can only does so little. Still need physical headphone/amp/DAC for huge boost in SQ nevertheless. some plug ins does improved the quality of sounds. sadly i have not try others except 1) ASIO 2) Secret Rabbit Code 3) Wasapi (its sounds like wasabi!) i might others out and let have some reviews on this. see, letting other device to enhanced our pc rig deserved the purpose of having it. might as well getting a separate hi-fi system. |
| Change to: | 0.0257sec
0.33
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 5th December 2025 - 08:53 PM |