QUOTE(ziggy87 @ Oct 4 2010, 10:19 PM)
i have a nano900p red. it's clone of YY's AT900P.
i think it's obsolete now, replaced by nano990p.
basically the red and white doesn't really have distinctive difference.
i feel it's a very good mid stiff racket, although it's a clone.
it has a slightly heavy head balance and it's light (4u)
strung it with Zy67@28lbs by Arc
i have not played with the ES-Z but if it really copies the ARCZ profile..
- nano900p will be more user friendly due to slightly bigger frame (= bigger sweetspot)
- ESZ will be faster due to the slim frame profile which to YY, produces the same effect as Victor BS: less air resistance, increased swing speed
those points above are true IF and ONLY IF apacs really copies the ARCZ completely
Added on October 4, 2010, 10:20 pmsomebody master the apacs ultimate doubles weapon already
sifuuu

well im not in a rush for the nano900p, if you're thinking of selling do look for me then , that is
IF and ONLY IF you wanna sell
for the EdgesaberZ , i do feel it swings faster as i tend to miss the shuttles or hit the top of the frame more often when i first got it , even though its slightly longer than most racquets around, so yes it does swing faster, how fast is it compared to its yonex counterpart is not known though.
its more of an even balanced that has all qualities but major in none racquet , im currently looking for 1 with noticeably more power, and with fast reactions such as the nano900p
*****
on a side note, theres saying that
faster swing = stronger smash
heavier head = stronger smash
so.. u guys judge yourself, which do you prefer, i personally think both will still have power with these characteristics , depending on your strings
This post has been edited by melvin93: Oct 4 2010, 11:12 PM