Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Home Theatre Uncompressed PCM? DTS HD? Dolby HD?, Which do you go for?

views
     
callmevil
post Sep 25 2008, 06:35 PM

80 Druid
*****
Senior Member
798 posts

Joined: May 2005



i am still baffled over this.. i know optical cable = fibre optics.. and i know fibre optics = easily do 400mbps.. and then i know those HD sound dont even go 10mbps.. so... whats the problem here? engineers stand up please?

This post has been edited by callmevil: Sep 25 2008, 07:40 PM
rthj
post Sep 25 2008, 07:31 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,048 posts

Joined: Aug 2008


so that the HDMI people can charge for licensing?

This post has been edited by rthj: Sep 25 2008, 07:53 PM
arremie
post Sep 25 2008, 11:07 PM

hmm...
*******
Senior Member
4,865 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
aiman....take out your charts for these dudes... laugh.gif
Blackhart
post Sep 25 2008, 11:27 PM

Like a rolling stone
****
Senior Member
508 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


In theory PCM, DTS HD and Dolby TrueHD deliver the same thing; whatever the studio master is supposed to sound like with no loss in detail.They are all perfect copies of the studio master.

You can close the thread now that the answer is found.It has long become yet another chat thread for Blu-ray fans.
mikapoh
post Sep 25 2008, 11:49 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,263 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
From: Kuching, Sarawak.
Therefore, for my case, getting a BD player 1st will not make much WOW factor as PQ can be improved by a slight margin in my HD ready plasma tv since I am not completely exposed to 1080 yet. And the audio part will still remain the same as before using optical rite?

Now getting a HD support receiver then follow by the BD player seems the most ideal planning cause I will enjoy the WOW effect in the sound system then. DO I really need a 7.1 set up in normal living room for a HD sound? My seat is just next to the rear wall.

Any other recommendation p/s, thanx
Blackhart
post Sep 26 2008, 12:13 AM

Like a rolling stone
****
Senior Member
508 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


QUOTE(mikapoh @ Sep 25 2008, 11:49 PM)
Therefore, for my case, getting a BD player 1st will not make much WOW factor as PQ can be improved by a slight margin in my HD ready plasma tv since I am not completely exposed to 1080 yet. And the audio part will still remain the same as before using optical rite?

Now getting a HD support receiver then follow by the BD player seems the most ideal planning cause I will enjoy the WOW effect in the sound system then. DO I really need a 7.1 set up in normal living room for a HD sound? My seat is just next to the rear wall.

Any other recommendation p/s, thanx
*
The jump from 720p HD Ready to 1080p Full HD is not as great as from 480 SD to 720p HD, unless you watch them through a very big screen.Yes if you use optical connection you can only get legacy Dolby Digital and DTS codecs, and stereo instead of multichannel for PCM.

7.1 would be nice for specially mastered 7.1 tracks but not a must, standard 5.1 is normally sufficient for enjoying surround sound experience.You can buy the two additional speakers later for full experience but I wouldn't make it a top priority.

Since you already have a plasma HDTV the next thing you should get is a BD player.It would be quite pointless to get have a HDTV and HD receiver but no HD source to feed it.Get a HD receiver after the BD player since normally it is normally easier to distinguish picture quality than audio quality.Make sure you have decent speakers and speaker cables to appreciate the higher resolution lossless audio.
mikapoh
post Sep 26 2008, 12:22 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,263 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
From: Kuching, Sarawak.
QUOTE(Blackhart @ Sep 26 2008, 12:13 AM)
The jump from 720p HD Ready to 1080p Full HD is not as great as from 480 SD to 720p HD, unless you watch them through a very big screen.Yes if you use optical connection you can only get legacy Dolby Digital and DTS codecs, and stereo instead of multichannel for PCM.

7.1 would be nice for specially mastered 7.1 tracks but not a must, standard 5.1 is normally sufficient for enjoying surround sound experience.You can buy the two additional speakers later for full experience but I wouldn't make it a top priority.

Since you already have a plasma HDTV the next thing you should get is a BD player.It would be quite pointless to get have a HDTV and HD receiver but no HD source to feed it.Get a HD receiver after the BD player since normally it is normally easier to distinguish picture quality than audio quality.Make sure you have decent speakers and speaker cables to appreciate the higher resolution lossless audio.
*
Respectfully explained and clearing my dilemma in choosing my next path to full HD world.

Anyone with better recommendation?

I guess I can have peaceful mind on my HD tv. Now will be feasibility study stage on where to start the next HD stage. Thanks bro, salute notworthy.gif
rthj
post Sep 26 2008, 12:44 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,048 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
QUOTE(Blackhart @ Sep 25 2008, 06:13 PM)
The jump from 720p HD Ready to 1080p Full HD is not as great as from 480 SD to 720p HD, unless you watch them through a very big screen.
*
yep...couldnt agree more
aiman04
post Sep 26 2008, 07:54 AM

THX-Certified Geek
*******
Senior Member
2,316 posts

Joined: Jul 2007


QUOTE(Blackhart @ Sep 25 2008, 11:27 PM)
In theory PCM, DTS HD and Dolby TrueHD deliver the same thing; whatever the studio master is supposed to sound like with no loss in detail.They are all perfect copies of the studio master.

You can close the thread now that the answer is found.It has long become yet another chat thread for Blu-ray fans.
*
Agreed. This thread is already done and answered on page 2! laugh.gif

7 Pages « < 5 6 7Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0136sec    0.38    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 06:07 PM