Busy lately with works.

Regarding "glossy" = shiney appearance , I think it has higher lycra contents.
Velvet , my guess is no gloss appearance, also feel maybe different.

By the way, I am eying this brand.. a bit more expensive but was told pretty lasting and has the proper crotch and panty design, .a friend that was ex-flight attendant with SIA told me.. only problem is, it has only tan color..

Futuro..

I prefer to wear the legging with long tops
It's comfortable

like a replacement for pants?
seen a lot of gals doing that..stirrup or footless legging with long top

---

Added on June 2, 2010, 12:49 ami'm interested in these - http://en.item.rakuten.com/aimere/b006003/
but don't know where to get'em

i'm interested in these - http://en.item.rakuten.com/aimere/b006003/
but don't know where to get'em

i have checked with my gf,

if you are getting the Charnos Simply Bare No Toe Tights, count me in

thx.

OCCASIONALLY  ASKED QUESTIONS

We get email and phone calls from new customers with concerns about wearing a garment that, even though it's for men, has a distinct resemblance to something a woman might wear. So in order to quell such concerns, here are our responses to those questions.



Is this cross-dressing?

We get asked that all the time! ACTIVSKIN is made for men. Saying that a man wearing men’s legwear is cross-dressing is like saying that a woman wearing cowboy boots is cross-dressing. The simple fact is that cowboy boots are made for men and women; they're unisex, just as hosiery is.

The real question here is, "Will others think that I am cross-dressing?" The vast majority of our customers will proudly tell you that the answer is no. Just like every other new fashion trend, there will be those very few who disagree with it. Remember, ACTIVSKIN is made for men, and men who wear men’s clothing are dressed normally.

On the other...er, leg, if you are a woman and like to wear ACTIVSKIN because you are smart and perceive that it is better quality and more durable than the cheap junk you get at the discount or drug store, then yes, you ARE cross-dressing, but we still love you!




How will people react to a guy in pantyhose?

Even though ACTIVSKIN legwear is made for men and is intended to be a men’s garment in every respect, in truth a quick glance may fail to distinguish it from women’s apparel. Most people won't notice, but in the unlikely event someone actually does see that you’re wearing unusual socks or underwear, you might expect their initial reaction to be that you’re wearing women’s hosiery. You know you’re not, so be confident, and have fun watching their reaction. Most people are too polite to care or say anything. They may raise their eyebrows, indicating that their brain cannot figure out this disconnect, and just go on about their business without so much as a comment or snide remark. Teenage girls may giggle. We recently received this email:

Hi,
surfing the web I found your site and I am really pleased to found that now there are pantyhose for guys. I'm sure they are more comfortable and also looks very nice.
But what surprised me the most was to find such a big polemic around guys who wears pantyhose! I've been wearing mine as part of my daily clothing since I was 13 and I've never had a problem for that, after I tried my first ones I never wore guy's socks again and I can't remember me hesitating the first time I wore them in public, maybe 'cause I have an alternative dress style, but anyway I can't see any prob with that, several of my friends wear them too. Now that I've wore pantyhose everyday in public since 6 years ago or so, I can say, no prob at all! If you think this could help someone else to do it and stop feeling bad for that, please feel free to publish. I also send you a pic of me, wearing my pantyhose in the streets of Paris.
Congratulations for your work,
Rob H.



Will people think I’m gay?

A few people will, out of total ignorance, make this connection. It's because they think(1) you are cross-dressing (you are not), and (2) cross-dressers are gay, which is definitely not true. Studies show that most cross-dressing men are heterosexual, mostly married, and normal loving husbands and fathers. Thus, to equate the clothing one wears with being gay is a gross error. There are many fashionable men who are not gay, and plenty of gays who are not fashionable. In any event, the physical benefits and comfort of wearing legwear transcends any stereotypes, so you can be confident in the apparel you choose. Conversation: "I notice you're wearing pantyhose. Are you gay?" Response: "No, I'm not gay. But I have a friend who is gay, and he has a shirt just like the one you're wearing...." Get the point?

King Louis XIV of France in Majesty, 1701, painted by H. Rigaud

King Louis XIV of France in Majesty, 1701, painted by H. Rigaud. Note the silk stockings or tights, high heeled shoes, lace, satin, wig, and bright colors.



Is this an aberration or is legwear for men a fashion that’s here to stay?

Consider this: People today seem to think of fashion as fixed, but it changes over time and geography, sometimes slowly, sometimes rather quickly. Legwear was worn by men (think Robin Hood) long before it was worn by women. Men today are relegated to rather limited and some would say boring fashion choices. It wasn’t always so. Three centuries ago men of the 1700’s wore silk stockings, high heeled buckled shoes, lace, satin, and powdered wigs. They also wore bright colors. They were the peacocks of the species. In the early 1800’s men began to wear long pants and dull colors, and it’s been that way for 200 years. Women, on the other hand, almost always wore long skirts that never showed their feet, much less their legs, but in the past century that has certainly changed! And pantyhose, once the necessary accessory, are seen less and less often on women today. Well, if they can’t appreciate the practical benefits, maybe men can! So you see, fashions are dynamic.

Here’s another analogy. Twenty years ago it was rare to see a man wearing earrings. But some did. Over the years, many did. And we’re not just talking about gay guys, but straight guys, macho guys, all kinds of men. It’s so common now, you don’t even think twice when you see a guy with earrings. But it was once something to stare at. Of course, in ancient times, men and women both wore earrings. As we say, fashions come and go. So it’s time for legwear for men to come on the scene, and for men to take advantage of the benefits and comfort it has to offer. Let your softer side luxuriate in a softer fabric and a practical garment that’s right for the 21st century.



Do some guys have a predisposition to legwear?

We joke that there are two kinds of people in the world: those with the “nylon gene” and those without. Those who have it like soft fabrics like silk, nylon, satin, and the like. Those who don’t are perfectly comfortable with cotton and wool. For women, it’s no problem. They can wear either kinds of fabric. For men it can be problematic. Men are supposed to be tough and macho in our society, so they can’t have a softer side and like soft fabrics. But these same guys have taken to silk boxers, Under Armour®, and thin nylon dress socks, and many have discovered the valuable benefits of nylon hosiery. They complained to us that women’s hosiery didn’t fit them well, and it was embarrassing to buy and wear; why couldn’t somebody invent men’s tights and pantyhose and stockings? So we did! Now they can wear it openly as men.



Are you the only, lonely company making legwear for men?

No, and not even the first, just the best. There are others. We do have competition. There is one company in the US which has a line of sheer pantyhose for men, and there are several European companies that make tights and sheer pantyhose for men. We’re pioneers, but our message is getting heard and copykatz are popping up here and there.



Why don’t I see other men wearing legwear?

1. Men don’t talk about their underwear to each other, especially if it’s unusual underwear. They tend to be insecure. We do not know why. It’s only clothing.
2. People’s eyes see what they expect them to see, so if they see a guy in pantyhose, their eyes tell them that can’t be, so they don’t see it. Don’t believe it? Go out in shorts (in shorts weather, not in January in Ohio) and skin matching color sheer pantyhose and see how many people notice. Probably nobody. It’s amazing but true.
3. Most men wear pantyhose and tights under long pants, so unless you’re on your hands and knees inspecting other guys’ socks, you won’t see it. If you are crawling around on all fours, you have other problems. See a doctor.
4. Men wearing legwear are in the minority. It’s a small group of forward-thinking fashion pioneers who have seen the light. Most guys are not fashion conscious and are not interested in legwear. Or they don’t like tight garments on their legs. They prefer baggy pants 3 sizes too big so they can show off their boxers when it falls to their hips.



What will my wife of girlfriend think? Or (worse) she can’t accept me in legwear, even ACTIVSKIN, so what can I do?

This is a tough one. Women can often accept other men who dress any way they want, but when it comes to THEIR man, they want him THEIR way, which is to say, macho. And they don’t equate somewhat fragile garments like pantyhose to being macho. Also, these same women often don’t have the nylon gene themselves, and hate the feeling and hate wearing legwear. (Often it’s because they don’t get a good brand and don’t get the right size because they lie to themselves about their weight). So if they can’t stand wearing legwear, how are they going to accept, let alone encourage, their man from wearing it, even if they know it’s for health benefits, for instance? It’s a difficult question, especially if the man has the nylon gene. We recommend lots of open, honest, and sincere communication. That sometimes works, but it can take lots of time. It’s better and far more successful to break the news to your woman before the relationship goes too far. If you are just getting into a relationship, tell her early that you have the nylon gene; if you wait till after your married, she’s likely to wonder what ELSE you’ve been keeping secret. That won’t win you any points.



Some styles have a cotton/nylon gusset. Men don’t have a need for a gusset. Why is it there?

Styles A549 (front panel with fly opening) and A569 (front panel but no fly opening) were our early products and with their male-comfort front panel, had a definite male orientation. That panel was expensive to make and sew, however, and many customers wanted something less expensive. We felt that we should explore that option, so we discussed it with one supplier, who showed us a style of control top women's hosiery. We tried it and liked it, so we made arrangements to have it produced for us to our specifications. Without a front panel, it could be made very inexpensively, because it would take advantage of all the automated machinery used to make women's hosiery, including the sewing of the toes, the sewing of the two leg blanks together, and the cotton/nylon gusset. We questioned the gusset, because men have no need for it. However, it serves an important purpose - it's strong fabric and it helps keep the seam from tearing at the crotch, which is a zone of very high stress when the wearer spreads his legs in sitting and walking. We were convinced that we needed to keep it, because we had experienced torn crotch fabric in our other styles on occasion, and the gusset added only a few cents to our total cost. So that's why it's there - for better durability.




Why are you calling them “pantyhose” for men, since panties are made for women? Shouldn't they simply be called men's hosiery, legwear, stockings, or something like that?

When we first got into the business of supplying men's legwear in 1999, we avoided all use of the word “pantyhose.” Men don't wear panties, so we shouldn't call it pantyhose, we reasoned. We called it legwear, hosiery, and other names. However, we weren't getting found on the search engines. We learned that it was because a large number of people were searching for "men's pantyhose" or "pantyhose for men." Without the word pantyhose on our web site, the search engines didn't find us! So we did an about-face and used the word pantyhose (and variant "panty hose" - two words) in the web site. And suddenly the search engines were onto us! The fact of the matter is that in American English, there is no other word that precisely describes what this garment is. “Tights” is used in Britain to mean both opaque and sheer legwear, but elsewhere “tights” means just opaque. "Hosiery," "legwear," and "stockings" can mean other kind of garments besides sheer pantyhose, so they don’t really specify what we mean either. Thus, whether we want to use "pantyhose" or not, we really must if we want to get found by customers looking for that word.



Do I need to shave my legs?

The short answer? “Of course not.” The long answer: First analyze the situation. Most women who wear sheer hosiery do so for appearance and fashion. If they have light color skin and dark leg hair, the hair will show through skin-matching hose. Many women (and men) find this appearance objectionable, so these women shave their legs. Most men, however, wear legwear for the benefits it offers (comfort, warmth, protection, etc.); appearance is not a concern at all; or it may be secondary at best. The following situations will usually not display obvious leg hair: (1) wearing opaque legwear or dark sheer legwear, (2) wearing legwear under trousers, (3) having dark skin and dark leg hair, and (4) having light skin and light leg hair. So, if you’re concerned about appearance, the only time it would matter is if you have light color skin and dark hair, and wear skin-matching sheer legwear with shorts. Then dark leg hair could be obvious. In that case it’s your choice if you want to shave or not. Some men do, some don’t.

Now, after all that is said, you should know that many men appreciate some non-visual benefits to shaving their legs: legwear feels better, it stays up better (because leg hair acts as a lubricant to accelerate the sliding down of stretched legwear), it massages the legs better, and there is no itching or hair pulling, which is annoying for some men. So is leg shaving for you? Well, lots of athletes do it: bikers, swimmers, football players, runners, body builders, and wrestlers for instance. Models and movie stars do it, too. It’s not just a feminine thing, necessarily, and in fact, Men’s Health magazine ran an article on body hair removal a couple of years ago, because more and more men are doing it as part of their grooming routine. And one nice advantage is that you can always try it with no risk. If you find you don’t like it, just let the hair grow back in a few weeks.

5 toes hosiery are amazingly comfortable. Beware when buying, make sure you get the sheer toes version.
Otherwise the reinforced 5 toes are just disgustingly ugly. (Pied de Glace brand recommended)

I've bought several before and I loved the sheer black ones.

There is the option of going opaque (70Den ) as well.
black or beige.
Great for winter months.

I've worn some with slippers, unfortunately they are quite fragile and would tear after about 2 days of wear.
So I can't wait for the Ladder Resistant 5 toes pantyhoses to come out.

The next big thing in Japan now is "Miracle Stocking" which is like 10 times better than Ladder resistant hosiery.

It doesn't even ladder to begin with.

Don't take my word for it

Watch it on youtube

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jKPzEXG86gA

Now, that's what I call a "Ladder proof" pantyhose!

^.^
If anyone is interested, I might even start selling them. 5 toed hosiery and Miracle stockings (actually pantyhoses)

p.m. me  Jennyleeph@yahoo.com.au