QUOTE(ic-klass @ Jan 24 2009, 07:01 AM)
As a general rule-of-thumb, the recommended viewing distance is
3X the size of the screen. So if it is a 50in, the recomended viewing istance is 3 X 50in = 150in. Many debated as what is "recommended viewing distance" really means. For me i like to take it as the minimun distance where you can appreciate the details and quality of the image with the least visible noise. For example, even with a full HD source on a full HD display will look gariny/noisy if you are just 2 feets away..
From my setup - i using 42in PV80 (not really HD), viewed at 3.5m, i would say I'm satisfied with the PQ. If watching astro - still can see some noise esp in local station, but better PQ with other non-local station. Watching DVD (depand on the "grade/quality") hardly any noise if the source is good. PQ with full hd, is the best but can really "lawan" full hd display lah. Cable and connection also play a major roles - get good quality one for better PQ.
The only catch is that it you sit too far, then you will be itching to upgrade to a bigger screen size - I wish i had bought the 50in..

was viewing the 508 and 428 kuro yesterday playing BD casino royale..
from 3mtr I have to say the 428 looks very good and lower rez panel doesn't really show it's pixel structure at this distance.. (even though it's not HD, agreed on your recommendation on its PQ, except it costs was like nearly 2x the PV80)
only when nearer distances like 1.5-2mtr only can see its pixel structure (to remind you it's not HD) so if you sit far enuf (or you can't really see pixel structure type of person

).. I guess lesser resolution is fine and easier on the wallet..
I'm kind of used to 1.5-2x screen distance viewing so I would say, bigger is always better.. except maybe when you have astro or low rez sources then you start seeing digital video (with low resolution) artifacts at larger TV sizes..can get very distracting/annoying sometimes..
This post has been edited by ar188: Jan 24 2009, 09:51 AM