Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Photography Panasonic LX-3 King of the King of digicam Updated, LEICAF2.0,1/1.63 sensor,24mm,HD,hotshoe
|
PCHo
|
Aug 22 2008, 07:26 PM
|
|
QUOTE(chuanchuan90 @ Aug 22 2008, 10:21 AM) which color u bought? black or silver??  nice shot from u,  Mine is silver What about yours? My frens kept telling me black better, but personally i like silver over black. Personal preference  Anyway, thanks for your praise, you have very nice shots too! And you beat me to the no.1 spot for 1st LX3 photos posted!!! Damn! hahahaha.... This post has been edited by PCHo: Aug 22 2008, 07:51 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
chuanchuan90
|
Aug 22 2008, 08:44 PM
|
Getting Started

|
lol, paiseh lo,haha...mine also silver ,but i like black color more than silver...but silver also nice la,diff feel d...
|
|
|
|
|
|
hahaboy
|
Aug 23 2008, 12:51 AM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(gogo2 @ Aug 21 2008, 01:52 PM) as expected la. Panasonic sensor and processing is one of the worst in low noise. Pls give back the king throne to Fuji la. LX3 worst than f100fd ? i'm considering get a LX3........
|
|
|
|
|
|
rawn
|
Aug 23 2008, 04:00 AM
|
Getting Started

|
i'm getting the LX3 as well. hell with the reviews, this compact is the shiznit! - well, for me at least.
|
|
|
|
|
|
PCHo
|
Aug 23 2008, 09:43 AM
|
|
QUOTE(rawn @ Aug 23 2008, 04:00 AM) i'm getting the LX3 as well. hell with the reviews, this compact is the shiznit! - well, for me at least. "hell with the reviews"? PhotographyBlog gave a 4.5/5.0 for the LX3. that's called heaven, not hell. hahahah  Check it out: http://www.photographyblog.com/reviews_pan...mix_dmc_lx3.phpAnd TrustedReviews gave a whopping 10/10 overall for the Lumix FZ28~! My goodness! Check out the FZ28 here: http://www.trustedreviews.com/digital-came...mix-DMC-FZ28/p1 Added on August 23, 2008, 9:46 amQUOTE(chuanchuan90 @ Aug 22 2008, 08:44 PM) lol, paiseh lo,haha...mine also silver ,but i like black color more than silver...but silver also nice la,diff feel d... Hahahaha....I purposely asked for silver This post has been edited by PCHo: Aug 23 2008, 09:46 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
chuanchuan90
|
Aug 23 2008, 01:44 PM
|
Getting Started

|
but it not really looks like silver,its color something like light brown or light golden...haha
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUSgogo2
|
Aug 23 2008, 03:21 PM
|
|
Hey, here is a thread compare LX3 and F100fd. Seems like LX3 is winning..!! http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat...29025395&page=2
|
|
|
|
|
|
anthrax33
|
Aug 23 2008, 05:05 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(kev da man @ Aug 22 2008, 09:08 AM) whoops, ill post my ISO800 100% crops in a bit lol totally forgotten about this thread XD jeng jeng jeng jeng » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « the low light isn't as impressive as advertised le. This post has been edited by anthrax33: Aug 23 2008, 05:06 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUSgogo2
|
Aug 23 2008, 09:38 PM
|
|
cannot expect anything from point and shoot la. if u want better performance, get dSLR lar.
|
|
|
|
|
|
chuanchuan90
|
Aug 23 2008, 10:02 PM
|
Getting Started

|
ya...tats right....LX3 is still a compact camera...
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUSN's
|
Aug 24 2008, 02:49 PM
|
|
I dun like DSLR. It capture blackhead.
|
|
|
|
|
|
daruma
|
Aug 25 2008, 09:32 AM
|
|
fotoedar quoted RM1600 for LX3 , no freebies.
any cheaper?
|
|
|
|
|
|
daruma
|
Aug 27 2008, 12:10 PM
|
|
another review for the king. http://www.lawrenceripsher.com/blog/2008/0...lx3-review.html Added on August 27, 2008, 12:16 pmQUOTE ISO 1600. Not usable for anything except maybe your MSN avatar. This post has been edited by daruma: Aug 27 2008, 12:16 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
PCHo
|
Aug 27 2008, 08:25 PM
|
|
QUOTE(daruma @ Aug 27 2008, 12:10 PM) The review looked pretty good. If you want good performance at ISO-1600 though, don't buy a compact. Anything less than a DSLR won't provide you with anything usable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
daruma
|
Aug 27 2008, 08:40 PM
|
|
QUOTE(PCHo @ Aug 27 2008, 08:25 PM) The review looked pretty good. If you want good performance at ISO-1600 though, don't buy a compact. Anything less than a DSLR won't provide you with anything usable.  i dun think the iso 1600 will be that bad.... he over exaggerated
|
|
|
|
|
|
PCHo
|
Aug 27 2008, 08:40 PM
|
|
 Shot this just now after work. hehehe.... Model - Lumix LX3 Aperture - f/2.0 Shutter - 1/25 ISO - 400
|
|
|
|
|
|
PCHo
|
Aug 27 2008, 08:53 PM
|
|
QUOTE(daruma @ Aug 27 2008, 08:40 PM) i dun think the iso 1600 will be that bad.... he over exaggerated  hahahah..... Depends on the person reading it also Anyway, compacts were never good at ISO-1600. I've seen so many compacts from so many brands, and frankly speaking, none of them (photos) can be used for any more than msn avatars. hahahah.....  Added on August 27, 2008, 8:55 pmQUOTE(daruma @ Aug 27 2008, 08:42 PM)  can't resist it... gonna buy it if G10 dun announce by friday  G9 was released earlier this year rite? Would they announce an upgrade in the same year? This post has been edited by PCHo: Aug 27 2008, 08:56 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
kev da man
|
Aug 27 2008, 11:54 PM
|
|
QUOTE(anthrax33 @ Aug 23 2008, 05:05 PM) the low light isn't as impressive as advertised le. of course la, its not using a APS-C sized sensor and Venus engine has its drawbacks mah
|
|
|
|
|
|
daruma
|
Aug 28 2008, 09:03 AM
|
|
QUOTE(PCHo @ Aug 27 2008, 08:53 PM) hahahah..... Depends on the person reading it also Anyway, compacts were never good at ISO-1600. I've seen so many compacts from so many brands, and frankly speaking, none of them (photos) can be used for any more than msn avatars. hahahah.....  Added on August 27, 2008, 8:55 pmG9 was released earlier this year rite? Would they announce an upgrade in the same year?  G9 annouce aug 2007. g10/11 should be selling in october Added on August 28, 2008, 9:05 amQUOTE(kev da man @ Aug 27 2008, 11:54 PM) of course la, its not using a APS-C sized sensor and Venus engine has its drawbacks mah  lawrence reviewed that LX3 perform better than G9 in high ISO about 2/3rd to full stop. adding the f/2.0, should have about 2 stops advantage This post has been edited by daruma: Aug 28 2008, 09:05 AM
|
|
|
|
|