QUOTE(Zot @ Jul 21 2015, 04:54 PM)
I agree that TL used more power and usually cost more due to complexity. FL motor needs to work more to flip the load unlike TL, less efford to turn. Load capacity is not the dry load. Once wet it is heavy

Just sales tactic

TL also got inverter. It is not about inverter save more power for me but the motor last longer due to less commutator burn when motor operates.
Cleaning time is subjective for me. It is based on manufacturer study and the result is subjective too. Normally the FL spins at higher speed due to need to make sure the clothing stick to drum. TL less effort required thus normally require longer dry time.
Actually current trend is more and more people going for TL

Actually for the same size, TL uses lesser power, since almost all setting are more or less fixed.
For WM, there's not much point and getting inverter, since the power usage difference won't be heaven and hell like air cond
QUOTE(Zot @ Jul 21 2015, 04:57 PM)
I agree on this too. I think Tl also have direct drive without using belt if that is your concern, but I think most are quiet enough
Using direct drive indeed will be more quiet, but when the motor fails, it can cost you a bomb.
While using belt is the belt will be the first part to go and it will be quite cheap to replace.
QUOTE(adrian0229 @ Jul 21 2015, 04:59 PM)
conclusion, for my requirement, I need at least 10kg to wash my king size mattress + comforter + bedsheet?
You need to consider you typical daily load.