QUOTE(surf-it @ Aug 13 2010, 11:09 PM)
That's right. But one thing I discover by researching properties is that, nowadays standard size single storey (22x70 above) cost more than double storey 18x65....
not sure why...maybe 18x65 really look sempit?
And also single storey in prime area isn't cheap either, Taman Tun 500k for intermediate, Bangsar 700-800k for intermeddiate....
I guess nowadays ppl tend to compare single storey to new condo development, when the condo price is high, single storey follows....
of cz I meant those FREEHOLD magic word one
Added on August 13, 2010, 11:12 pmwell said buddy, but in your opinion, is this correction going to affect matured area landed property as well? not taman tun and bangsar those sky high price, I am talking about places like Taman Desa, OUG which the price escalate quite steadily...
All you need to be concerned about in a correction are RE prices which escalated quickly over the last 3-5 year. You know which areas these are and how silly the price increases became. I'm sorry but you cannot expect RE to double quickly and have it sustain itself without consequences down the road. These properties could correct back to where they were in 2005-2007 as there were both increases naturally and speculative increases artifically inserted.
Most developed nations will show a curve of all major cities charting growth in RE over a timeline. It is in fact easier to calculate the correction using a baseline year like 2007 or 2005 to see how far down your percentage will go. The avg. will be based on these major cities or you could take a more micro view on KL and surrounding neighborhoods.
Ie. you may find a 20% in Taman Desa and 35% in Bangsar!
Added on August 14, 2010, 9:02 amQUOTE(cherroy @ Aug 14 2010, 12:57 AM)
Another I want to add is that, renting is not necessary no good.
Renting benefit
1. Improve cashflow, due to less commitment
2. You get rid of the housing liabilities part of story.
3. Can move on easily.
Cashflow is very important to individual especially for middle to low group people whereby financially generally tight.
If renting can significantly improve one's cashflow and lead to more financial flexibility and more room for others like investment, business, renting is not as bad as many have taught.
We have seen not few case that people over commit themselves into housing loan, until cannot breath much every month.
Buy a house and rent out, sometimes is not as lucrative return as many have taught. The net return after deducting all the expenses incurred (as well as being taxed), the return could be on par with FD rate or some even worst than FD rate.Â
Gross yield of residental properties for rental market generally quite low (except for certain strategic, golden location), and their gross yield can be in range of 5% only. After deducting the expenses incurred, and tax issue, it could be as low as 3-4%.Â
It is not quite rewarding, as you still need to face tenant's risk/troublesome issue as well.
This is exactly what has happened all around the world, dont believe Malaysia is any different! Renting is now the new trend in America where for over 30 years it was deemed "my right" by consumers to own. The rich even have paid the price for ownership. Consider these signs and do the math as "keeping your powder dry" or being "cashed up & liqud" doesnt mean that you are ready, but living within your means where in the case of US UK and Eurozone those families are sometimes the last ones standing.
3-4% after taxes and expenses, property management and dealing with contractors and whining tenants is bad enough but if there is a correction, if you dont have over 30%+ into the property it could be under water on prinicipal, and with correcting rentals and competition for best rent you may not be able to keep it anyhow.
This poster has touched the surface of what can and has occured already in other parts of the world and could quickly turn here.
Unless you are of the mindset that "This is Malaysia, we're different!"
This post has been edited by Onemorething: Aug 14 2010, 10:00 AM