Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

55 Pages « < 11 12 13 14 15 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Ashley's CoD4 Kopitiam Corner, If you don't wanna chit, you better chat

views
     
Holyboyz
post Jul 3 2008, 06:12 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
421 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: l33tstreet


QUOTE(Beast-Slayer @ Jul 3 2008, 12:21 PM)
he's er.. holy is ashley in ur list?
*
Oh dear totally forgot... ok adding

Whore list(updated)
1.Sanction ( Whore of the universe Master of all whores that Commands all whores)
2.Grr
3.Nobie
4.Quack
5.foo grey
6.Ashley

QUOTE
I don't know about you guys, but I literally don't have a life outside of Blitzone. You see, I actually live there. I sleep under the tables when you people have gone home. I gain sustenance by eating burger wrappings and sucking dregs from your discarded Coke cans. One time I caught a rat. It was old and slow and fat, or I would never have been able to snare it. The Ramli burger guy was kind enough to cook it for me on his little stove. As its tiny bones cracked between my filthy teeth, lacerating my gums and filling my mouth with the taste of my own blood, I was struck by the realisation that it and I were not so different in the end; both consumers of human refuse, gorging on the discarded leavings of others. There was one big difference though, I was a live while it wasn't. I chewed faster and resolved to catch more rats in the future. That was a good day. smile.gif


user posted image

WTF!!?!?!?!
kaiser_falco
post Jul 3 2008, 06:37 PM

the world wanderer
******
Senior Member
1,167 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: sunway/petaling jaya



lol this thread...errr...so full of trash talk,dang it really is the kopitiam huh..
Holyboyz
post Jul 3 2008, 08:11 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
421 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: l33tstreet


QUOTE(kaiser_falco @ Jul 3 2008, 06:37 PM)
lol this thread...errr...so full of trash talk,dang it really is the kopitiam huh..
*
thats why its called ashleys Kopitiam Cod4 coner ^^ its under gamesr hideout i thnk cuz of Cod 4 tongue.gif

TEE HEE!!!!!
[ESP].quack
post Jul 3 2008, 08:15 PM

New Member
*
Validating
1 posts

Joined: May 2008


ok f*** this shit enough is enough. i call truce with mr.marvin, this is getting a bit out of hand lolx.
marvintwj
post Jul 3 2008, 08:26 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
20 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


Yea, I'll call truce too. Haha, I never knew muzzle flash could cause so much problems.
Luftwacko
post Jul 3 2008, 08:29 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
682 posts

Joined: Jan 2008


QUOTE(marvintwj @ Jul 3 2008, 08:26 PM)
Yea, I'll call truce too. Haha, I never knew muzzle flash could cause so much problems.
*
Glad you guys declared peace rclxms.gif . Btw, what's wrong with muzzle flash? I don't see how it can affect one's aiming...
marvintwj
post Jul 4 2008, 03:26 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
20 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE
Alright who is the motherf***er who says I've got no life?


Hmm, not too sure. I think that would be me. But it's just my personal opinion.

QUOTE
5. I come in and tell someone they're (yes someone. Did I specifically mention you by name?) a f***tard because that someone didn't seem to understand what everyone was saying.

6. Strangely enough, a moment of guilt caused to suspected fuctard to suddenly come out into the open with personal attacks directed against me.

Why are you suddenly so angry with me? i didn't mention you by name.


Hmm, you slowly scan the whole thread and see if anyone is insulting you. No? Oh dear me, that just leaves me as the lone suspect. I'm sure even with your standard 3 level of education, you can put 2 and 2 to make 4. Or can you? But, it's ok. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and I'll be kind to dumb animals by not proving my point any further. I can't possibly make you look any stupider then you currently are already.


QUOTE
3. Everyone else thinks you're f***tard.


Yes, of course Sanction speaks for everyone. Sanction's word is the law. Sanction this, Sanction that. No wonder name also sanction la, if anyone wants to breathe in blitz, need you to sanction that action, ya? Well, Sanction can go f*** himself for all I care. Nobody I know really gives two hoots about you.

QUOTE
4. You attempt to justify your actions with bullshit.


Yah, they are bullshit to you cause you have the mentality and the brains of a 9 year old.

Haha, and btw, seriously, even before the flame war begun, you've always been the noobest member of [ESP] . You couldn't knife me while I'm stunned and blinded. And correct me if I'm wrong, but you have the propensity to act big and important, no? Boy, just because your mother doesn't give you a curfew, it doesn't make you an adult. Capish, boy?
kaiser_falco
post Jul 4 2008, 03:45 AM

the world wanderer
******
Senior Member
1,167 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: sunway/petaling jaya



duh...enoughla you guys,now now,stop playing in the cc and why not come and join us in bvpn server..
crashtec
post Jul 4 2008, 04:58 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
8 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(marvintwj @ Jul 4 2008, 03:26 AM)
Hmm, not too sure. I think that would be me. But it's just my personal opinion.
Hmm, you slowly scan the whole thread and see if anyone is insulting you. No? Oh dear me, that just leaves me as the lone suspect.  I'm sure even with your standard 3 level of education, you can put 2 and 2 to make 4. Or can you? But, it's ok. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and I'll be kind to dumb animals by not proving my point any further. I can't possibly make you look any stupider then you currently are already.
Yes, of course Sanction speaks for everyone. Sanction's word is the law. Sanction this, Sanction that. No wonder name also sanction la, if anyone wants to breathe in blitz, need you to sanction that action, ya? Well, Sanction can go f*** himself for all I care. Nobody I know really gives two hoots about you.
Yah, they are bullshit to you cause you have the mentality and the brains of a 9 year old.

Haha, and btw, seriously, even before the flame war begun, you've always been the noobest member of [ESP] . You couldn't knife me while I'm stunned and blinded. And correct me if I'm wrong, but you have the propensity to act big and important, no? Boy, just because your mother doesn't give you a curfew, it doesn't make you an adult. Capish, boy?
*
Now now.. stop being a troll. Besides, the person who asked the question is no longer here i believe.
This kind of behaviour is what i want to change in gamers, trolls and flamers. You see, insult on the internet has no particular value, you can say what you want and have no effect what so ever, from personal experience.

When you want a point taken into consideration, take it out verbally because from what i see from this thread is a bunch of trolls flinging axes around. What does a troll mean? You're clearly a human, yes. But a troll in internet terms is "someone who posts controversial and usually irrelevant or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum or chat room, with the intention of baiting other users into an emotional response or to generally disrupt normal on-topic discussion."

Judith Donath (1999) first documented this practice of "trolling", who used several anecdotal examples from various Usenet newsgroups in her discussion. Donald's paper outlines the difference between real communities and "virtual communities"

"In the physical world there is an inherent unity to the self, for the body provides a compelling and convenient definition of identity. The norm is: one body, one identity. ... The virtual world is different. It is composed of information rather than matter."

Which in laymans terms mean regardsless of who you say you are, you are still a virtual entity online, which means you can pretend to be someone or on the pretext of being "helpful" be otherwise destructive.

Donath provides a concise overview of identity deception games which trade on the confusion between physical and epistemic community:

Trolling is a game about identity deception, albeit one that is played without the consent of most of the players. The troll attempts to pass as a legitimate participant, sharing the group's common interests and concerns; the newsgroups members, if they are cognizant of trolls and other identity deceptions, attempt to both distinguish real from trolling postings, and upon judging a poster a troll, make the offending poster leave the group. Their success at the former depends on how well they — and the troll — understand identity cues; their success at the latter depends on whether the troll's enjoyment is sufficiently diminished or outweighed by the costs imposed by the group.

Trolls can be costly in several ways. A troll can disrupt the discussion on a newsgroup, disseminate bad advice, and damage the feeling of trust in the newsgroup community. Furthermore, in a group that has become sensitized to trolling — where the rate of deception is high — many honestly naïve questions may be quickly rejected as trollings. This can be quite off-putting to the new user who upon venturing a first posting is immediately bombarded with angry accusations. Even if the accusation is unfounded, being branded a troll is quite damaging to one's online reputation." (Donath, 1999, p. 45)[1]

marvintwj, with all due respect you are not helping the poor sod who first asked the question about muzzle flash, instead you chose to OUTLINE other users and readers before you answered him. Although your outline was taken as borderline flame, it wouldn't be if you were close to the readers. But your sudden appearence in the thread to with written slangs "what's so farking cute" to people you don't really know, makes you a troll. It is therefore a natural response of active members to be defensive towards your behaviour, regardless if you did not mean to offend them in the first place.

From the explanation above im sure you can identify which part is considered a bait and which part consists of a flame. But for reference i will identify them for you.

Your first reply or post was on 20th June 2008 saying "mmmmzzz...who cant play for this coming tourney ar? if death susu sanction hayabusa all can play...wah then sien lor..duwan join "

This isnt an issue since you were pretty much on topic.

Your next reply was on 1st of July, pages later saying "What so farking cute about this reply? I mean, I dunno about you la, but I wasnt born with the ability to play CoD4 instantaneously. He already said he's noob, means new player la. I dont see the "cuteness" in it. If you're not gonna help him, don't humiliate and deflate people, can? And IMHO, training doesnt make the muzzle flash go away, although it helps you get used to it.

And btw, johnnycp, use silencer, use a different weapon or watch for the mini crosshair that appears when you hit something. Thats all I can offer.

In response to this post by JohnnyCP

"dear COD4 pro,

i need some help here, whenever i fire ma gunz. the muzzleflash are too huge
and blocking my vision. It really disrupt my aiming. Kindly advice.
TQ


From,

COD4 NoobAss


I will identify the baits for you.

1. BAIT - "What's so farking cute about this reply? I mean, I dunno about you la, but i wasn't born with the ability to play COD4 Instantaneously"
Why is this a bait? - You stayed on topic but you no longer attempted to answer the question. Instead, you chose to find fault in another users post, indirectly throwing an insult infront of the multitudes of people reading.

2. BAIT - "He already said he's noob, means new player la."
Why is this a bait? - You are reassuring JohnnyCP that he is a noob, whereas the question he posted had nothing to do with restating such. This was completely irrelavant to the post above. Therefore baiting users further into an emotional response.

3. BAIT - "If you're not gonna help him, don't humiliate and deflate people, can?"
Why is this a bait? - let's take a lot at the reply of the users from the original post.

Luftwacko instantaneously replied and answered his question stating "Then use silencer to reduce muzzle flash".
AeonStrife gave another reasonable answer stating "yea or lower ur vid settings "
Quack decided to comment on the reply and while stating another possible solution "lol.... this has to be the most cutest reply ive seen for COD4...lolx....JUST KEEP TRAINING THE GUN YOU'VE GOT PROBLEMS WITH."

Let's take a look at your reply again.

"What so farking cute about this reply? I mean, I dunno about you la, but I wasnt born with the ability to play CoD4 instantaneously."
There was no reason to say the second sentence. Justifying your reply does not help you answer your question. This is irrelavant, you diregarded the question.

"He already said he's noob, means new player la. I dont see the "cuteness" in it."
Here, you restate that Johnny is a noob, which basically means you are indirectly insulting him. The second statement shows you have problems with people saying that replies are cute and also attempts to justify your first sentence. Like girls saying mashi maro's are cute, perception is a man's gift to himself, no two minds perceive the same in all things - i for one do not find bears with plungers stuck on their heads cute. This was a blantlant insult to Quacks reply.

"If you're not gonna help him, don't humiliate and deflate people, can?"
In all 3 replies there were no insults, no humiliations and deflatations. In fact, all 3 are present in YOUR post. The first quote was an insult, the second was deflatation and humiliation("already a noob") of the original poster's question. All 3 replies gave 3 different answers.

"And IMHO, training doesnt make the muzzle flash go away, although it helps you get used to it."
This is true, and i have no problem with this answer.

"And btw, johnnycp, use silencer, use a different weapon or watch for the mini crosshair that appears when you hit something. Thats all I can offer."
Finally getting to the picture, which is ofcourse at the END of the conversation, you repeat a reply from a previous post, not stating you agree with it or disagree with it, regardless you claim it to be yours, justified in the second part of this sentence "Thats all I can offer".

Although genuinely you did propose some points, you main focus was not in replying to the question,but rather making a point of other replies. Rather than agreeing or disagreeing with their replies, you disregard them and focus on less important parts of the replies, such as "cuteness" which on all accords was not even part of the question. A mere comment on Quack's behalf.

If you didnt mean to insult these people, the least you could have done was apologize when they reacted irrationally, but you had rather continued your "Fight" rather than back down and review your post. I will disregard all other posts after the posts stated above, due to the fact that there was no attempt to stop this behaviour after the first signs of dispute.

And if you say wrote such words due to your lack of knowledge in English, then you should have justified those claims a little earlier than letting it move 3 pages to the end.

The mastery of english isnt about the number of words you know or sentences you can make, it is the focus of your sentences, placement of the words and ability to understand what the reader perceives in what you write that makes you good in a language. The best writtings can always be written in simple english and still have its charm because the best authors understand the focus of their articles and how their readers will perceive it, no matter how simple or complex they may become.

This is NOT an insult to you or to those who replied to your posts but rather a note for you to understand what mistakes were made in such a short period of time. However this is only a reference for those who WANT to stop all these non-sense.

besides, all i really wanted to say was.

I like trains... Do you like trains?
Muzzle flash is reduced by remove specular map and lighting from the options menu. Muzzle flash only occurs after spraying a weapon over a short duration of time, apparent in weapons such as AK74u, RPD and M60e. All of which are either high powered weapons with a high caliber or have short barrels.

AKS-74U which stands for "Avtomat Kalashnikov So "skladnym prikladom" - 74 Ukorochenniy" uses a 5.45x39mm bullet, which is the biggest for the available weapons in COD4, explaining its penetration ability. If you translate that into english it means "Automatic Rifle Kalshnikov 1974 Model with Metal Side-Folding Stock Carbine"

Weapons with longer barrels have less muzzle flash due to the travel time of bullets and airspace in the barrel from one end to the other. The longer the barrel the less muzzle flash. Silencers also help reduce muzzle flash, but reduces accuracy and range.

Silencers causes friction and reduces bullet travel speeds which in turn also allows enemies to see bullet trails more often. This explains why there is a Range drop when you equip a silencer into a weapon.

Both RPD and M60E have long barrels which reduce muzzle flash by itself. However, due to the caliber of both weapons (both use 7.62 NATO or similar ammo) their muzzle flash will be large upon regular use - spraying for example. It is better to fire in bursts of 3 to fully utilize its accuracy and power. Training does help here since mastering the weapon reduces muzzle flash here.

Assault based weapons such as, AK47, M4Carbines, M14, G3 & G36c don't have muzzle flash problems as compared to submachine or machine guns. The long barrels reduce muzzle flash by itself and the caliber of those weapons fit their range. AK47 uses 7.62 ammuntion, similar to the RPD, it is however slower in fire rate, so spraying will not affect the muzzle flash. Also explains the penetration ability of the AK47 in COD4.

M4 Carbines use the 5.62mm catridge, which with its long barrel has less penetrating power and reduced damage. Smaller bullets also mean they are released faster from the catridge and barrel increasing lock and loading speeds. This explains the rate of fire speeds for weapons in COD4.

Sub-machineguns such as MP5 and P90 have higher fire rates because they use the 9mm bullets, similar to those you find in pistols like Berretta's. These guns were not made to penetrate armor, but due to its size over caliber ratio, these weapons fire faster. You P90 whores. .. . . .. .
Using a RDS (Red Dot Sight) or Silencer on these weapons don't do more then silence your weapons and reduce accuracy, so that is really up to you. Muzzle flash on the P90 can only be seen after 1-2seconds of constant trigger fire - spraying.. bunch of whores.

If you didnt know already knives and shotguns dont have problems with muzzle flash... knives dont have barrels but they do block your screen. Shotguns dont fire fast enough to cause a real issue, but putting a red dot might help make you blinder.

This post has been edited by crashtec: Jul 4 2008, 05:38 AM
Grr
post Jul 4 2008, 09:20 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
17 posts

Joined: Apr 2008


QUOTE(crashtec @ Jul 4 2008, 04:58 AM)
Now now.. stop being a troll. Besides, the person who asked the question is no longer here i believe.
This kind of behaviour is what i want to change in gamers, trolls and flamers. You see, insult on the internet has no particular value, you can say what you want and have no effect what so ever, from personal experience.

When you want a point taken into consideration, take it out verbally because from what i see from this thread is a bunch of trolls flinging axes around. What does a troll mean? You're clearly a human, yes. But a troll in internet terms is "someone who posts controversial and usually irrelevant or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum or chat room, with the intention of baiting other users into an emotional response or to generally disrupt normal on-topic discussion."

Judith Donath (1999) first documented this practice of "trolling", who used several anecdotal examples from various Usenet newsgroups in her discussion. Donald's paper outlines the difference between real communities and "virtual communities"

"In the physical world there is an inherent unity to the self, for the body provides a compelling and convenient definition of identity. The norm is: one body, one identity. ... The virtual world is different. It is composed of information rather than matter."

Which in laymans terms mean regardsless of who you say you are, you are still a virtual entity online, which means you can pretend to be someone or on the pretext of being "helpful" be otherwise destructive.

Donath provides a concise overview of identity deception games which trade on the confusion between physical and epistemic community:

Trolling is a game about identity deception, albeit one that is played without the consent of most of the players. The troll attempts to pass as a legitimate participant, sharing the group's common interests and concerns; the newsgroups members, if they are cognizant of trolls and other identity deceptions, attempt to both distinguish real from trolling postings, and upon judging a poster a troll, make the offending poster leave the group. Their success at the former depends on how well they — and the troll — understand identity cues; their success at the latter depends on whether the troll's enjoyment is sufficiently diminished or outweighed by the costs imposed by the group.

Trolls can be costly in several ways. A troll can disrupt the discussion on a newsgroup, disseminate bad advice, and damage the feeling of trust in the newsgroup community. Furthermore, in a group that has become sensitized to trolling — where the rate of deception is high — many honestly naïve questions may be quickly rejected as trollings. This can be quite off-putting to the new user who upon venturing a first posting is immediately bombarded with angry accusations. Even if the accusation is unfounded, being branded a troll is quite damaging to one's online reputation." (Donath, 1999, p. 45)[1]

marvintwj, with all due respect you are not helping the poor sod who first asked the question about muzzle flash, instead you chose to OUTLINE other users and readers before you answered him. Although your outline was taken as borderline flame, it wouldn't be if you were close to the readers. But your sudden appearence in the thread to with written slangs "what's so farking cute" to people you don't really know, makes you a troll. It is therefore a natural response of active members to be defensive towards your behaviour, regardless if you did not mean to offend them in the first place. 

From the explanation above im sure you can identify which part is considered a bait and which part consists of a flame. But for reference i will identify them for you.

Your first reply or post was on 20th June 2008 saying "mmmmzzz...who cant play for this coming tourney ar? if death susu sanction hayabusa all can play...wah then sien lor..duwan join "

This isnt an issue since you were pretty much on topic.

Your next reply was on 1st of July, pages later saying "What so farking cute about this reply? I mean, I dunno about you la, but I wasnt born with the ability to play CoD4 instantaneously. He already said he's noob, means new player la. I dont see the "cuteness" in it. If you're not gonna help him, don't humiliate and deflate people, can? And IMHO, training doesnt make the muzzle flash go away, although it helps you get used to it.

And btw, johnnycp, use silencer, use a different weapon or watch for the mini crosshair that appears when you hit something. Thats all I can offer.

In response to this post by JohnnyCP

"dear COD4 pro,

i need some help here, whenever i fire ma gunz. the muzzleflash are too huge
and blocking my vision. It really disrupt my aiming. Kindly advice.
TQ
From,

COD4 NoobAss
I will identify the baits for you.

1. BAIT - "What's so farking cute about this reply? I mean, I dunno about you la, but i wasn't born with the ability to play COD4 Instantaneously"
        Why is this a bait? - You stayed on topic but you no longer attempted to answer the question. Instead, you chose to find fault in another users post, indirectly throwing an insult infront of the multitudes of people reading.

2. BAIT - "He already said he's noob, means new player la."
          Why is this a bait? - You are reassuring JohnnyCP that he is a noob, whereas the question he posted had nothing to do with restating such. This was completely irrelavant to the post above. Therefore baiting users further into an emotional response.

3. BAIT - "If you're not gonna help him, don't humiliate and deflate people, can?"
          Why is this a bait? - let's take a lot at the reply of the users from the original post.

Luftwacko instantaneously replied and answered his question stating "Then use silencer to reduce muzzle flash".
AeonStrife gave another reasonable answer stating "yea or lower ur vid settings "
Quack decided to comment on the reply and while stating another possible solution "lol.... this has to be the most cutest reply ive seen for COD4...lolx....JUST KEEP TRAINING THE GUN YOU'VE GOT PROBLEMS WITH."

Let's take a look at your reply again.

"What so farking cute about this reply? I mean, I dunno about you la, but I wasnt born with the ability to play CoD4 instantaneously."
There was no reason to say the second sentence. Justifying your reply does not help you answer your question. This is irrelavant, you diregarded the question.

"He already said he's noob, means new player la. I dont see the "cuteness" in it."
Here, you restate that Johnny is a noob, which basically means you are indirectly insulting him. The second statement shows you have problems with people saying that replies are cute and also attempts to justify your first sentence. Like girls saying mashi maro's are cute, perception is a man's gift to himself, no two minds perceive the same in all things - i for one do not find bears with plungers stuck on their heads cute. This was a blantlant insult to Quacks reply. 

"If you're not gonna help him, don't humiliate and deflate people, can?"
In all 3 replies there were no insults, no humiliations and deflatations. In fact, all 3 are present in YOUR post. The first quote was an insult, the second was deflatation and humiliation("already a noob") of the original poster's question. All 3 replies gave 3 different answers.

"And IMHO, training doesnt make the muzzle flash go away, although it helps you get used to it."
This is true, and i have no problem with this answer.

"And btw, johnnycp, use silencer, use a different weapon or watch for the mini crosshair that appears when you hit something. Thats all I can offer."
Finally getting to the picture, which is ofcourse at the END of the conversation, you repeat a reply from a previous post, not stating you agree with it or disagree with it, regardless you claim it to be yours, justified in the second part of this sentence "Thats all I can offer".

Although genuinely you did propose some points, you main focus was not in replying to the question,but rather making a point of other replies. Rather than agreeing or disagreeing with their replies, you disregard them and focus on less important parts of the replies, such as "cuteness" which on all accords was not even part of the question. A mere comment on Quack's behalf.

If you didnt mean to insult these people, the least you could have done was apologize when they reacted irrationally, but you had rather continued your "Fight" rather than back down and review your post. I will disregard all other posts after the posts stated above, due to the fact that there was no attempt to stop this behaviour after the first signs of dispute.

And if you say wrote such words due to your lack of knowledge in English, then you should have justified those claims a little earlier than letting it move 3 pages to the end.

The mastery of english isnt about the number of words you know or sentences you can make, it is the focus of your sentences, placement of the words and ability to understand what the reader perceives in what you write that makes you good in a language. The best writtings can always be written in simple english and still have its charm because the best authors understand the focus of their articles and how their readers will perceive it, no matter how simple or complex they may become.

This is NOT an insult to you or to those who replied to your posts but rather a note for you to understand what mistakes were made in such a short period of time. However this is only a reference for those who WANT to stop all these non-sense.

besides, all i really wanted to say was.

I like trains... Do you like trains?
Muzzle flash is reduced by remove specular map and lighting from the options menu. Muzzle flash only occurs after spraying a weapon over a short duration of time, apparent in weapons such as AK74u, RPD and M60e. All of which are either high powered weapons with a high caliber or have short barrels.

AKS-74U which stands for "Avtomat Kalashnikov So "skladnym prikladom" - 74 Ukorochenniy" uses a 5.45x39mm bullet, which is the biggest for the available weapons in COD4, explaining its penetration ability. If you translate that into english it means "Automatic Rifle Kalshnikov 1974 Model with Metal Side-Folding Stock Carbine"

Weapons with longer barrels have less muzzle flash due to the travel time of bullets and airspace in the barrel from one end to the other. The longer the barrel the less muzzle flash. Silencers also help reduce muzzle flash, but reduces accuracy and range.

Silencers causes friction and reduces bullet travel speeds which in turn also allows enemies to see bullet trails more often. This explains why there is a Range drop when you equip a silencer into a weapon.

Both RPD and M60E have long barrels which reduce muzzle flash by itself. However, due to the caliber of both weapons (both use 7.62 NATO or similar ammo) their muzzle flash will be large upon regular use - spraying for example. It is better to fire in bursts of 3 to fully utilize its accuracy and power. Training does help here since mastering the weapon reduces muzzle flash here.

Assault based weapons such as, AK47, M4Carbines, M14, G3 & G36c don't have muzzle flash problems as compared to submachine or machine guns. The long barrels reduce muzzle flash by itself and the caliber of those weapons fit their range. AK47 uses 7.62 ammuntion, similar to the RPD, it is however slower in fire rate, so spraying will not affect the muzzle flash. Also explains the penetration ability of the AK47 in COD4.

M4 Carbines use the 5.62mm catridge, which with its long barrel has less penetrating power and reduced damage. Smaller bullets also mean they are released faster from the catridge and barrel increasing lock and loading speeds. This explains the rate of fire speeds for weapons in COD4.

Sub-machineguns such as MP5 and P90 have higher fire rates because they use the 9mm bullets, similar to those you find in pistols like Berretta's. These guns were not made to penetrate armor, but due to its size over caliber ratio, these weapons fire faster. You P90 whores. .. . . .. .
Using a RDS (Red Dot Sight) or Silencer on these weapons don't do more then silence your weapons and reduce accuracy, so that is really up to you. Muzzle flash on the P90 can only be seen after 1-2seconds of constant trigger fire - spraying.. bunch of whores.

If you didnt know already knives and shotguns dont have problems with muzzle flash... knives dont have barrels but they do block your screen. Shotguns dont fire fast enough to cause a real issue, but putting a red dot might help make you blinder.
*
B for effort. Could have been a B+ but for the fact that you didn't reference any material in the last half of the post. If you claim all of the materiel at the bottom of the page is yours, come see teacher immediately.

Luftwacko
post Jul 4 2008, 09:24 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
682 posts

Joined: Jan 2008


QUOTE(crashtec @ Jul 4 2008, 04:58 AM)
AKS-74U which stands for "Avtomat Kalashnikov So "skladnym prikladom" - 74 Ukorochenniy" uses a 5.45x39mm bullet, which is the biggest for the available weapons in COD4, explaining its penetration ability. If you translate that into english it means "Automatic Rifle Kalshnikov 1974 Model with Metal Side-Folding Stock Carbine"
*
Just to add on a lil' point to that, "which is the biggest for the available submachine guns in CoD4". The biggest badass bullet in the game is the nasty .50 caliber bullet found in Barrett .50 cal monster sniper rifle tongue.gif .

QUOTE
M4 Carbines use the 5.62mm catridge, which with its long barrel has less penetrating power and reduced damage. Smaller bullets also mean they are released faster from the catridge and barrel increasing lock and loading speeds. This explains the rate of fire speeds for weapons in COD4.


Ah yes, another correction here, being the M16's evil twin brother, both rifles are chambered with 5.56x45mm cartridge.

QUOTE
Sub-machineguns such as MP5 and P90 have higher fire rates because they use the 9mm bullets, similar to those you find in pistols like Berretta's. These guns were not made to penetrate armor, but due to its size over caliber ratio, these weapons fire faster. You P90 whores. .. . . .. .
Using a RDS (Red Dot Sight) or Silencer on these weapons don't do more then silence your weapons and reduce accuracy, so that is really up to you. Muzzle flash on the P90 can only be seen after 1-2seconds of constant trigger fire - spraying.. bunch of whores.


Hmm... I'm not sure whether the P90 in the game is chambered with 9x19mm parabellum or the standard 5.7x28mm cartridge. Maybe I should test it out the next time I play CoD4. smile.gif

lol, I guess we have 1 thing in common... we both think that ppl who uses no other weapon than P90 are whores icon_rolleyes.gif
Sanction
post Jul 4 2008, 10:20 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
20 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
QUOTE(marvintwj @ Jul 4 2008, 03:26 AM)
Hmm, not too sure. I think that would be me. But it's just my personal opinion.
Hmm, you slowly scan the whole thread and see if anyone is insulting you. No? Oh dear me, that just leaves me as the lone suspect.  I'm sure even with your standard 3 level of education, you can put 2 and 2 to make 4. Or can you? But, it's ok. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and I'll be kind to dumb animals by not proving my point any further. I can't possibly make you look any stupider then you currently are already.
Yes, of course Sanction speaks for everyone. Sanction's word is the law. Sanction this, Sanction that. No wonder name also sanction la, if anyone wants to breathe in blitz, need you to sanction that action, ya? Well, Sanction can go f*** himself for all I care. Nobody I know really gives two hoots about you.
Yah, they are bullshit to you cause you have the mentality and the brains of a 9 year old.

Haha, and btw, seriously, even before the flame war begun, you've always been the noobest member of [ESP] . You couldn't knife me while I'm stunned and blinded. And correct me if I'm wrong, but you have the propensity to act big and important, no? Boy, just because your mother doesn't give you a curfew, it doesn't make you an adult. Capish, boy?
*
Sweet

Let's put some things into perspective.

Yes I agree with your opinion on the first count on being a motherf***er (see? I don't always disagree brian.)

Now for the rest of that "dialogue".

It has been proven that when someone is unable to argue any of his points, or has nothing to the basis of his "facts", he will begin to spout bullshit. Would you like to provide proof of anything you have currently said? I can see that you're a "visitor" to blitz and that it takes you awhile to come up with "arguments" and comebacks to what I or people have to say or you would answer them in order without skipping anything. I'm sorry that I'm having to make you think so hard. I'm not used to dealing with people with "real" lives. There are many people who feel frustrated in their lives about things they cannot do or unable to do so they come to the internet and if you really want to bring it all out on me that's perfectly fine.

But you yourself already admitted to being someone who walked in with guns blazing and somehow you decided that person was you. If there had been no one talking bullshit in the first place I would have been told off and scolded. But as it, everyone suddenly understood what I was saying. Therefore what I said was true in all aspects.

I would like to emphasise that everything that has been said by you so far, has been far from factual, or helpful. With the exception of that silencer comment you have yet to contribute anything useful at all to the group. You obvious are very frustrated with life as you wouldn't act this way in real life whereas I am, as everyone knows, an *******. These are all facts. If anyone would like to contradict me on that fact please do so. As brian pointed out, the difference between you and everyone else I know in this thread is that their behaving exactly like in real life. The conversations you read here are EXACTLY as if they were being held face to face.

Coming from you on the other hand. I'm 100% sure that you would not have the courage nor the ability to ever confront a person and say the things you have said. My condolences to your family, that they brought up someone who was in all ways, unable to say what he really wanted to say to another person's face. When you actually perform the act of speaking to me in that manner in person I'll apologise and say I was wrong, until then, be more confident in yourself and try to work harder for it. When you mature fully and understand a few more things about life, when you're capable of actually understanding what I actually said in my posts. Please do so. People know what message I sent and where. Do you?

Oh btw, I didn't use the bullshit, that's brian's word. I tend to use rubbish. However when described to me, before I came in, a number of people already said you were spouting bullshit. Just so you know where you stand. It's obvious that you don't hold any of the members in ESP in high regard as the first thing you did when you can in was start insulting people. Yes, ESP deals with a lot of people who unable to achieve our level of play. I'm a Team captain and I was elected by my peers. I have asked if anybody else in my team would like to take over and no they don't. If you have what it takes to be good, why don't you prove it by playing? I may be the noobest in ESP, but that fact I'm already here says I'm 1 million times above the average player. You declared yourself a noob and from what I can tell that ensures that you're way below the average player. Now what is a little boy like you trying to tell daddy?

And personally, i don't think what your friends say really matter. They have no effect on my life as a person and as far as I know neither do you. It is vastly entertaining to come in, word a perfectly good post and watch you dig yourself a bigger hole for the mods to pimp you. You've already admitted with your 2+2 section that yes you're indeed inside this thread to cause trouble in the community. I have never turned anyone away from the game but if a new player comes in and see's that it attracts people like you, it's going to break the community to know someone like you actually operates in this enviroment.

It is my wish that you play in another arena of play such as maybe "life" and improve yourself there first.

Cheers mate.

You shouldn't be so angry with life. Life deals out shit every now and then, and right now for you, it's probably is uphill all the way.

And I'm waiting for the time you'll actually start making noise about my grammar and spelling, it's the next step of trolling.
You took the first step in assuming I was actually talking about you and then trying to blame me. Now I'd like to see if you have the ability to take back what you said and prove yourself "the better man".


Added on July 4, 2008, 10:24 amAdd on: Eh Crash, why are you explaining everything to the guy, he knows exactly what he's doing and why. He's educated enough to know what's right and wrong and he's obviously experienced more of life than the most of us. So why bother trying to explain something that he already knows?

This post has been edited by Sanction: Jul 4 2008, 10:24 AM
king_kong
post Jul 4 2008, 11:41 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
371 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: from an open field.


good intellectual read.

it is good to have people who claim to be smarter than the average joe. otherwise, this world would've been boring.

let us all laugh in unison at people who claim to be smarter than the average joe!
Sanction
post Jul 4 2008, 11:53 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
20 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
=p didn say nuthin'
crashtec
post Jul 4 2008, 11:55 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
8 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(Luftwacko @ Jul 4 2008, 09:24 AM)
Just to add on a lil' point to that, "which is the biggest for the available submachine guns in CoD4". The biggest badass bullet in the game is the nasty .50 caliber bullet found in Barrett .50 cal monster sniper rifle  tongue.gif .
Ah yes, another correction here, being the M16's evil twin brother, both rifles are chambered with 5.56x45mm cartridge.
Hmm... I'm not sure whether the P90 in the game is chambered with 9x19mm parabellum or the standard 5.7x28mm cartridge. Maybe I should test it out the next time I play CoD4.  smile.gif

lol, I guess we have 1 thing in common... we both think that ppl who uses no other weapon than P90 are whores  icon_rolleyes.gif
*
Oh yeah, did some typos there.
AK74u has the biggest for its range in Submachine guns. But actually, the AK74u was a remake to fit in between the Assault => Sub-machine classes.

Also another typo on my part is the M16 and M4. Both use the same ammo, but one is semi auto-burst while M4 is fully automatic. M16 was a mass-produced design for the vietnam war, technically unreliable and prone to jamming.

Looking at the penetration rate of the p90 in COD4, it might be 5.7mm, since there are more than 2 versions to the p90. The other fires rubber bullets tongue.gif


Added on July 4, 2008, 11:57 am
QUOTE(king_kong @ Jul 4 2008, 11:41 AM)
good intellectual read.

it is good to have people who claim to be smarter than the average joe. otherwise, this world would've been boring.

let us all laugh in unison at people who claim to be smarter than the average joe!
*
Who you talking bout mr. kong? >;P

This post has been edited by crashtec: Jul 4 2008, 11:57 AM
Luftwacko
post Jul 4 2008, 12:15 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
682 posts

Joined: Jan 2008


QUOTE(king_kong @ Jul 4 2008, 11:41 AM)
good intellectual read.

it is good to have people who claim to be smarter than the average joe. otherwise, this world would've been boring.

let us all laugh in unison at people who claim to be smarter than the average joe!
*
Haha? blink.gif
king_kong
post Jul 4 2008, 12:19 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
371 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: from an open field.


QUOTE(crashtec @ Jul 4 2008, 11:55 AM)
Oh yeah, did some typos there.
AK74u has the biggest for its range in Submachine guns. But actually, the AK74u was a remake to fit in between the Assault => Sub-machine classes.

Also another typo on my part is the M16 and M4. Both use the same ammo, but one is semi auto-burst while M4 is fully automatic. M16 was a mass-produced design for the vietnam war, technically unreliable and prone to jamming.

Looking at the penetration rate of the p90 in COD4, it might be 5.7mm, since there are more than 2 versions to the p90. The other fires rubber bullets tongue.gif


Added on July 4, 2008, 11:57 am

Who you talking bout mr. kong? >;P
*
can't say, won't say. sorry. slight hangover today.
affr0boy
post Jul 4 2008, 12:58 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2007


seriously, wow! hahaha, i didnt know AK-74u was gonna be so much better than mp5. apparently not many ppl uses AK-74u last time. U can see more often p90 whores ( which i was one b4 ), mp5, m4, ak47 and many more.


weet, brian u google to find wat kind of guns and bullets ker? tongue.gif


king kong king kong. dun drink too much la. belly beer la. hahaha.
king_kong
post Jul 4 2008, 01:01 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
371 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: from an open field.


QUOTE(affr0boy @ Jul 4 2008, 12:58 PM)
seriously, wow! hahaha, i didnt know AK-74u was gonna be so much better than mp5. apparently not many ppl uses AK-74u last time. U can see more often p90 whores ( which i was one b4 ), mp5, m4, ak47 and many more.
weet, brian u google to find wat kind of guns and bullets ker? tongue.gif
king kong king kong. dun drink too much la. belly beer la. hahaha.
*
damn, was the belly tat obvious?
Grr
post Jul 4 2008, 01:05 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
17 posts

Joined: Apr 2008


Actually, some of the bigger clans in Europe sort of stick AK-74 in the same category as the P90 because it's quite cheating lar. Handling characteristic like a rifle at far range and shoots fast enough to match almost any SMG at close range. On top of that bullet penetration quite... WAH LAN IT'S DAMN CHEATING LAR.

55 Pages « < 11 12 13 14 15 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0243sec    0.52    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 22nd December 2025 - 09:16 AM