Mods adviced me to open a thread in here for discussion.

His/her name hiding to avoid conflict.


This fellow already picking on me for the third time. Even blind also know he is coming after me for revenge.

There are two thread removed which I am not able retrieve my customer list and informations.
The thread is opened way before he becomes the mod.

The recent case.
http://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopic=367358&hl=
http://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopic=541628&hl=
http://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopic=616281&hl=
http://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopic=636039&hl=
http://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopic=629645&hl=

Best example for power abused.
http://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopic=588872&hl=

I advice staff in here removed his mods title immediate effect.

This post has been edited by DAViS: May 5 2008, 07:32 PM

what is excessive bump?more than 3 "i already pm "?

i only can see less than 3 bump

OMG..just read a couple of thread...you just replying to question also consider indirect bump kaa??

If you indicate that you are replying to a pm its an indirect bump.

what if the indication of replying a pm comes with a reply to one of Davis's potential customer's post...he needs to indicate a pm as what is contained in the pm is sensitive (price related if you see)....

but i see some of the posts he is answering his buyers' questions in the thread (as reference for all) and at the same time, indicating that he has replied. UGPM alone would definitely be an indirect bump but i dont see any harm in answering a question and at the same time, for the sake of clarity, inform the buyer that the pm has been sent.

not the first time v2k has been complained for being unfair or power abusing, and somehow i dont think that is a coincidence.

All I see is indirect bumps. A lot of things can be answered by sending a PM to potential / current buyers instead of "bla bla bla, check your pm".

Is that mean you can't reply to ur own thread at all? Every explanation must be reply in PM? lol... this should be pretty interesting case.

i have gone through all the thread last time and i find out that most of the seller done so ... even i also doing that ...but how come i never been take action ?

its not fair to do it to davis only

As far as I know once I have replied the message, the thread can't bump on that particular day.
If I have mutiple reply without "Do not combine", the posting will merge together at the previous posting and it will not 'bumps' up the thread either.

Look at those replies and see the time stamp you will know why.

Am just stating the reasoning behind Viking's action. As people wanted to know.

That is how the BUMP button supposed to work.
You've replied=BUMP for the day. If you have not replied, you use BUMP=BUMP of the day as well.
If you have multiple reply to do, there's Multi-quote Function for you to use.

If everyone with the mentality of oh, my thread have not bump cos of the message combine. I shall uncombine the post. If everyone take their own sweet time(2 hour one post, reply, next 2 hour another post; this ain't fair isn't it to the others?) in replying, some even can quote their own post(yes, I've seen this) and act like

this bumping system is created to at least provide a fair system for all the traders out there.
Certainly everyone wants their thread to be on top all the time, ain't?

We have a lot of threads to look after every day, so some might be considered as lucky for being escaped. OK, thanks for telling I'll look into your threads more often next time.

Those people in power perhaps should read the thread then only leave comment at least read the time stamp.

when ppl have power they tend to abuse it. So just be happy about it. Not happy find another forum or start another forum lol.

I really dun see any indirect bump as there is so many seller still doin it.
pls be fair a bit ... so many safe trader " allowed " to answer " received ur pm " or " replied his msg via pm " but not us ?

Always hit the report button if you see such replies. Everyone is treated fairly, safe traders are ought to obey trade zone R&R as well.

---

Added on May 6, 2008, 12:15 amAnyhow, this thread isn't supposed to be here. Thread moved to Main Site/Forum Feedback and Helpdesk.

This post has been edited by fruitie: May 6 2008, 12:15 AM

We remove posts which are in breach of forum rules, just cause you don't see them, don't mean they're not there.

Report button. We don't "allow" it, we just don't notice it.

we're looking into this now. those who have nothing constructive to say, keep your comments to yourself.

---

Added on May 6, 2008, 1:56 am

Davis, as a holder of the safe trader tag, we expect a higher level of maturity from you. However, it seems there are just too many instances that you seem to think you're above the rules of the forum.

While you might have a point to the above threads not being indirect bumps, there have been numerous other occasions where you have indirectly bumped topics by quoting your own posts, and posting redundant replies ie "you've got PM". There are also many instances where you have pointed members to external links to make purchases which is against the trade zone policy.

This coupled with your unnecessary comments when advised to put in the tags for your sale threads, posting defamatory comments against a trade enforcer and reopening threads closed by a moderator are more then enough grounds for us to reconsider your tag.

Your threads will be reopened, but we do hope that you will exercise more caution in the future when it comes to the rules of the forum. Our rules are quite straightforward, and it would be in your best interest to adhere to it.

Sorry, double posting.

---

Added on May 6, 2008, 8:15 amse7en,
In your position you already know that the external link is for reference only, we have sort it out and you should not need to rehearsal again.
I did given all the points and facts on why the external links given and we did rest the case don't we?

Since LYN allowed some one in here choose to micro managing my threads, in future I try not to reply my customer question in posting which certain people would think I choose to use indirect bump method.
I have many sales to make and conduct and I have no time to resort this low level bumping tactic like 99% people did in here. Sorry is not my concern and I don't bother it either.

Since I have pointed out where is wrong doing by that specific fellow which I have named it at my title have you guys ever look at it or at least click my links and read the timestamp? If not please do so and sort this matter in justice way.

The "you've got PM thing" have you read the posting yet? I choose not to quote in here but I want you personally click the link and read it.

"Defamatory comments" only made to certain personnel which he has a history I told you guys before. You choose to back your man, I rest my case since I have being challenging you guys standing ground, infact from what I see is some people are seeking for revenge and troubles. Last time when I have some wrong doing, goldfries and rangered will informed me via PM like recently last year one time I have some scripting issue the autobump running for many times in an hour. Do you see that a simple issue can be solve if we approaching through soft way in proper manner but some one in here choose not to instead flexing his muscles infront of me and many others (as peoples reported).

Last and least, do not use "reconsider my tag" as your choice to shut my mouth and my feedback, it ain't work that way. The tag given by you because the way I conducting honest business and selling genuine items in here, I never apply for it but you honour it willingly from your heart which you feel is suitable within the manner of conducting business in here. You may remove it if you think you have to, I have no objection on it.

If I have done anything wrong, get some one else contact me or manage me instead of the person that I mentioned. The last time the thread which removed closed by bad intention, now I am asking where is my thread? I have to retrieve my customer informations. You can close the thread forever if you think it is absolute wrong and causing your site reputation or server damage which it has being there for about < 2 years.

Thank you.

Regards,
Davis

This post has been edited by DAViS: May 6 2008, 08:15 AM