Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Discussion Beautiful Footbal? Do you really need it?

views
     
yngwie
post May 12 2008, 12:16 PM

| Ðøñ'¯|¯ G|v€ Â ÐðmÑ!
*******
Senior Member
3,092 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: |{µð£ð £µmPµ®


QUOTE(fcbarcelona-my @ May 11 2008, 11:43 AM)
tak jugak. as long as fans strongly support their team (like barca..on this difficult time)...sponsor still coming becoz they know there's till a huge of potential buyer. (also other clubs like..the kops..milanisti..juvenitti..culers..madridista etc..etc) . even my team lost 10-11 in row..i'm still support my team becoz i'm always believe we'll strike back on the next (or another) season. rclxm9.gif
*
the big clubs ' huge followers worldwide attract the sponsors, and their results, players and playing style attract the followers. this must be the reason you support barca and not murcie or real zaragoza instead brows.gif
barca play beautiful football. there is no denying it! but they end up with nothing and the clear out is planned. at the end of the day, it is still the result that matter most.

about the supported team, back in 1989, when i was a kid, i've had an option of joining my uncle with the all conquering kops team but i choose mu when they win virtually nothing. blame it on gary pallister tongue.gif but
my persistent paid off handsomely smile.gif

QUOTE(Jason_T @ May 12 2008, 10:00 AM)
as long as you win, your football is beautiful.
if you lose, no matter how beautiful your football is, your club owner stil regard it as ugly
*
exactly! any team can'park their team's bus in front of goal' and catch the opposite team they're busy pushing the bus away' laugh.gif
modern day football not necessary have to be beautiful. effective play is the name. cool2.gif
this may sound boring but watching the actors and divers on the field is far worst than watching a paint dry yawn.gif
Duke Red
post May 12 2008, 12:28 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
6,112 posts

Joined: Sep 2006
From: Earth


With all due respect you weren't exactly an average side back then. Games between our two clubs were already competitive. You had good players like Jim Leighton, Paul Parker, Gary Pallister, Steve Bruce, Dennis Irwin, Ryan Giggs, Bryan Robson, Paul Ince, Lee Sharpe, Mark Hughes and Brian McClair in the side. Not bad by any stretch of the imagination and I'm sure you'd agree. If not because we were such a strong side back then I would say that your side underachieved in the 80's.

Dude I don't mean to be picky but we aren't "the kops". You won't like it if I called you "the Stretford Ends" right?
leftist
post May 12 2008, 12:52 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
734 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: Sri Petaling


QUOTE(presario9 @ May 3 2008, 12:40 AM)
yes, for football sake, we really need beautifull football.. i personally dislike the negative way of playing football and the so called long pass type team (bolton, liverpool, england, greece). they play for the result only.. they did forget that fans pay ticket to be entertained.. i dont think that a true loyal fan will be very dissapointed if their team did'nt win anything but play a good attractive football. it is the manager and coaches job to win matches using good atrractive football. thats what make a difference between coaches. people like sir alex, arsene, rijkaard and a few more know how to make the team play beautifull football. i am pretty sure, that every football players in this world like to play a good football including us, but then again they need to listen on how their manager want they to play. the main culprit that that damage the beautifull football is those manager who afraid that by playing a good football will cost their job. message to all those managers, if you dont know how to make your team win matches by playing beautifull football, for football sake, please resign..
*
liv played longball???..if we were behind 0-1 and there's only 2minutes left u mean rite?? blink.gif



in houllier era that may be rite...but not in rafa's era...we r more into possession futbol rather than long ball team..there will be long & short pass thru the course of de game...but definitely not a 1 way style of long ball punt to penalty box!
yngwie
post May 12 2008, 12:59 PM

| Ðøñ'¯|¯ G|v€ Â ÐðmÑ!
*******
Senior Member
3,092 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: |{µð£ð £µmPµ®


QUOTE(Duke Red @ May 12 2008, 12:28 PM)
With all due respect you weren't exactly an average side back then. Games between our two clubs were already competitive. You had good players like Jim Leighton, Paul Parker, Gary Pallister, Steve Bruce, Dennis Irwin, Ryan Giggs, Bryan Robson, Paul Ince, Lee Sharpe, Mark Hughes and Brian McClair in the side. Not bad by any stretch of the imagination and I'm sure you'd agree. If not because we were such a strong side back then I would say that your side underachieved in the 80's.

Dude I don't mean to be picky but we aren't "the kops". You won't like it if I called you "the Stretford Ends" right?
*
giggs and irwin wasn't there yet. ince, mc clair, parker and hughes. yepp.
gary pallister entertain me with his run back to defend the line. thats it! tongue.gif
agree with you, but liverpool was just too formidable back then sweat.gif

err.... sorry about the kops. it was supposed to be the short form of the kopites. icon_rolleyes.gif

This post has been edited by yngwie: May 12 2008, 01:01 PM
Duke Red
post May 12 2008, 01:22 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
6,112 posts

Joined: Sep 2006
From: Earth


QUOTE(yngwie @ May 12 2008, 12:59 PM)
giggs and irwin wasn't there yet. ince, mc clair, parker and hughes. yepp.
gary pallister entertain me with his run back to defend the line.  thats it! tongue.gif
agree with you, but liverpool was just too formidable back then  sweat.gif

err.... sorry about the kops.  it was supposed to be the short form of the kopites. icon_rolleyes.gif
*
Ah I see no worries.

We were a formidable side of course along with you and Arsenal. Even Spurs were doing much better than while Chelsea was nowhere to be seen. It was a time where I would say all the top sides played fluid football and consisted largely of English or at least British players. It's the reason I find it so surprising that England can play really boring football at times, these days especially. I'm thinking it's because the have employed managers that are too disciplined in their approach like Hoddle and Sven.
yngwie
post May 12 2008, 01:49 PM

| Ðøñ'¯|¯ G|v€ Â ÐðmÑ!
*******
Senior Member
3,092 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: |{µð£ð £µmPµ®


i was still a kid back then but my uncle told me, if it wasn't the heysel tragedy, liverpool could bagged a few more euro crown.
england was once a feared team, they are a regular quarter finalist in world cup.
lately, seem like even a team like georgia can give em a run for their money doh.gif
me too find it quite surprising; with the players of gerard, lampard and rooney(just to name a few) in their team, england still can't perform up to expectation.
no more flair in play. lack of creativity.....and thus, no results.






4 Pages « < 2 3 4Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0156sec    0.87    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 18th December 2025 - 06:06 PM