check back a few pages back, ksking posted his 3dmark as well as game results

---

Added on June 2, 2008, 1:42 pmlatest results from Guru3D:

9600GSO 384 overclocked: 666/1655/2000
9600GT overclocked : 750/1800/2100

The GSO loses to 9600GT by 1 to 2 FPS up to resolution of 2560x1600(!) where it loses by 5 FPS. It's not a huge difference, and shows that the GSO is really a great performer after OC due to the extra shaders (96 vs 64). The 9600GT was oc'ed higher, had more bits (256 vs 196) but only manages to pull ahead slightly in real world gaming tests. =)

This post has been edited by reign226: Jun 2 2008, 01:42 PM

http://en.hardspell.com/doc/showcont.asp?news_id=3463 << Why they use 8800 GT bios geh?

hmm.seems messed up there guys.have you guys tried exactly has the sites that have moded them.i.e using the same driver,bios and the magic panel(or xtreme tuner) to flash the same bios?if cannot flash to 8800gts why not try 8800gt?
http://lly316.blogspot.com/2008/05/how-to-...to-8800gts.html
tis site use NVIDIA Forceware for Geforce 8
175.16. they use this bios: http://xiazai.zol.com.cn/detail/32/318830.shtml
and this oc software : magic panel
http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/641261 (just click the download link there)
try try and see....maybe can...or maybe not.
just my 2 cents!

Different chip used.


Galaxy 96GSO and 8800GTS: G92- 400

8800GT: G92- 200 (I think)

9600GS lame, 8800GS: G92-150

I personally think that Galaxy paid Hardspell to put out this article while in reality you just can't flash it. Probably BS to sell their cards, as the 9600GSO isn't exactly popular.

This post has been edited by X.E.D: Jun 2 2008, 02:44 PM

but bro ksking manage to flash it what?

I think the bullshit story has some truth in it la. Don forget ksking got his card to work. Its probably cos not all the cards can work...most probably they put in some moddable cards with the rest of the non-moddable (really buggy cut down 8800GTS cards) and let the consumer play lottery.

Thanks for pointing out but we have tried those.

Erm...that's a bold statement. The original article is NOT from hardspell. It's from pchome.net....check the screenie watermarks.

And BTW....galaxy 9600GSO OC doesn't use G92-400. They use G92-150.

Looks like you are the one that is BS-ing here.

This post has been edited by davidletterboyz: Jun 2 2008, 02:51 PM

http://translate.google.com.my/translate?h...l%3Den%26sa%3DG



vista users try close parental control(i have no idea what it is coz im not using vista) then try flash using the magic panel.maybe succesful flash will happen with galaxy own software
just trying to help.BTW david where did you get your card?

This post has been edited by area61: Jun 2 2008, 02:53 PM

the problem is that flash is successful, but the card artifacts upon boot, suggesting that the card cannot use the bios or that the unlocked memchips contained errors (the reason why they are locked in the first place). The parental control u refer to is called UAC or user access control, and most users have probably turned them off already becaue it's very annoying.

OIC.thaanks for the enlightening information.thank god im not using vista.@reign226, have you bought yours?

We need more faith guys =D Labrats! Go get 1 to work then I buy =P I kumpul 215 bucks already.. 175 more to go.

haha not yet...seller supposed to ship now...hopefully i can get by tomorrow! but i dun think my card can success....after hearing what happen to bryan. But I just wanna OC kaw kaw until achieve 8800GT then i happy liao

use nvflash via dos, works better

apparently the flash hates my gaygaybite mobo, as i flashed on a friends DFI mobo, the GC works :S

although to what extent that it was successful, that i cannot say (whole nite till now din sleep leh, summore got assignments =_=)

this thread is very interesting to read.bro, get some sleep and later tell us more about the extent of your success

wow dude? seriously? Can give more detail? You were able to successfully flash it and boot into windows without artifact? So weird one...lolz. Yea get some sleep then come back and shed some light on the question

eh bro brayan ,,,,,u alredy solve the boot up artical problem ???? teach me pls


i now wait for prefect bios that is >> 96sp 512mb + 256bit .......i think when my gc open 96 sp to 128 sp will artical ...because the chipset some sp already spoil from 88gt chipset then them hide the spoil chipset make them into 96gso/88gs chipset .....so when open 96 to 128sp will cause artical? ...my cent ....

yeah i supposed so. Solution -> skip the gigabyte boards

slurp..testing mine tonite..hope it will at least flash

im using mars mb ...also got problem ?

err ya so it seems.. mmm so iguess now is mobo/chipset dependable?

bro ksking is using p965 to flash ......this is only the 1 mb i have @@......can flash on ? G35 ?