QUOTE(empyreal @ Jun 11 2008, 05:46 AM)
personally speaking, as one who did not delve any deeper into international finance than the macroecon level, should not the reduction in gov spending allow the bank some space to reduce rates? to be sure, this is counter-acted by the inflationary effects of oil, yet with governemnt spending, as well as public spending lower nowadays, and seeing that there is going to be a freeze on new gov projects, surely public savings is up which in turn allow banks to offer cheaper rates to spur growth?
and in contrast with what dreamer opines, if we have a large amount of savings despite the low rates, then it means that its quite inelastic, then. if we lower it further, it won't move by much, stands to reason. furthermore, i see nothing wrong with national money going out. any earnings from that money invested outside that is thus repatriated counts into the intangible exports section of the national accounts.
i am a bit confused, though. what do you refer to by 'demand for money'? is it money demand, as in the economic sense where it is the amount of currency one wishes to hold in proportion to savings, or money demand in terms of something else? this is because, in times of recessions, with the uncertainty of banks, money demand goes up, as in more money is in the hands of the public.
of course, it is all a muddle to me, currently. (drunk again, barbecue.).
The high supply of money has caused FD rate stay at historical low. Why? because since 1998 crisis, domestic demand has slumped and not recover well, while export is good because of cheaper RM, so trade surplus is building every year, every month, so money become plenty.
But with less investment opportunites around (businesses expansion, investment like stock market), those cash is just sitting in the banks doing not many things. You can esee those well managed company, mostly are high in cash level, which also a lot of well managed listed company give windfall special dividend from time to time because those cash has not much opportunites being used.
Gov spending is not reduced, don't be misled by this few days newspapers headline, those reduction is just tiny portion to make newspaper headlines, insignificant.
In fact, if gov spending is really reduced and slightly thrifty (like don't buy a Rm200 screw drive set) then gov won't have budget deficit of more than 3% of total GDP.
Also, although Malaysia ecoonomy is highly depended on gov (as 1 millions + workforce is in gov servant), still gov spending is not the entire picture, private sector is the one main driving force of the economy.
Another point is that reduction in gov spending has no direct relationship with money supply.
Actually we have negative interest rate at the moment as inflation rate > FD interest rate.
This post has been edited by cherroy: Jun 11 2008, 11:34 AM