2.20 fW out?? hurray !

Kasi link please!!

dloading now ---- 7xxKB/sec

---

Added on March 25, 2008, 11:18 amhere u go guys ....

hahaha

---

Added on March 25, 2008, 11:21 amDLOAD-done !

i love the office broadband

tonite go back update

This post has been edited by megatron007: Mar 25 2008, 11:21 AM

So still no DTS MA support eh?

fuyoh...very fast....

but still no dts-ma decoding yet....

this time got resume playback lar....

not yet la

time being enjoy DTS core 1.5Mbps first lo

arrrr...why don't they just use Dolby TrueHD or LPCM for everything and ask dts to PYT!!!

aiya

DTS big co. la

heheh gotta show respect ma

use LPCM no need to pay license fees mar....wouldn't be more worth it except it takes up more storage place nia....

we need BD-200GB version liao

haha

---

Added on March 25, 2008, 1:35 pmFRANKLY speaking


LCPM Dolby vs legacy Dolby

how significant??

20% more % ??




This post has been edited by megatron007: Mar 25 2008, 01:35 PM

national treasure 2 nice ka?

not bad la

the movie


to me not as boring as NT1

Signs Coming to Blu-ray

Walt Disney Pictures Walt Disney Studios Home Entertainment has announced that they will release the M. Night Shyamalan thriller 'Signs' for Blu-ray on June 3rd. Video will be presented as 1080p AVC and be accompanied by a 5.1 PCM soundtrack. Extras include a making-of featurette, deleted scenes, multi-angle storyboard presentation, and an early M. Night Shyamlan short film.

This release follows the Blu-ray release of 'Unbreakable', which is on schedule to be released on April 1st. No word on the possible release of the most popular M. Night Shyamalan film 'Sixth Sense'.

source : blu-ray.com

http://www.answers.com/topic/digital-theater-system
"In the consumer (home theater) market, AC-3 and DTS are closer in terms of audio performance. When the DTS audiotrack is encoded at its highest legal bitrate (1.5 MBps), most technical experts regard DTS as achieving perceptual transparency (i.e. indistinguishable to the uncoded source in a double blind test.) At AC-3's maximum bitrate of 640 Kbps, Dolby claims similar transparency."

Finding Nemo is also coming..................in 2009.

---

Added on March 25, 2008, 2:22 pmJust curious lah what are Dolby Digital and DTS's bitrate for movies shown in theatre?

This post has been edited by fentanyl: Mar 25 2008, 02:23 PM

At World's End - Dolby Digital vs. Uncompressed PCM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I am noticing the Dobly Digital track is beter than PCM.....

My Setup

1) Onkyo 805 - Set to "Multi Channel"
2) PS3
3) HDMI

PS3 - set to Bit Stream

Most have rave about PCM so I decided to compare PCM versus Dobly Digital using Pirates Of The Caribbean - At World's end. When comparing DD versus PCM, I noticed the Dobly Digital was MUCH louder and had more detail and clarity. The PCM track was lower in volume and dull. This seems contrary as the PCM track is supposed to sound much better. Can anyone do a AB test with that blu ray disc. Maybe my ears are malfunctioning.

Thanks

---

Added on March 25, 2008, 2:26 pmIt's simple, most receivers cannot play multi-channel PCM even if you are hooked up with HDMI, your okyo Receiver needs to be less than a year old and the model that was able to support multi-channal LPCM was over a 1000$ when it came out.

DD is often lounder because it's a compressed format a receivers have upconverters for that type of format that actually and artifacts that people confused with detail. These sound upconverters don't work in LPCM because the format is "pure"

For people that are hooke up in multi-channel in and digital at the same time and switch depending on sound format usually lose about 5-10% in volume because they lose gain when they go to analogue depending on quality of cable.
If you have any technicle questions just ask me, I work with these things all day

---

Added on March 25, 2008, 2:28 pmAgreed PCM is the same whether over bitstream or LPCM. Either way you are just sending the opure PCM signal to the recevier. On my Pioneer 92txh I can switch from bitstream to LPCM on the fly with the PS3 and there's no difference.

---

Added on March 25, 2008, 2:29 pmFrom my research, setting the PS3 to "bitstream" still enables the PCM track to be played. Hence I left it on BitStream for comparison.

I know PCM is better and provides more detail but I just dont hear it. I'll try to level adjust for volume tonight.

However, I did try this combination

PS3 = LPCM + BluRay = DD 5.1 => Very Low, volume lacked, no detail
PS3 = LPCM + BluRay = PCM => Louder than above, and provided more detail

With PS3 = LPCM, would that be eliminating the receiver to add artificial "crap" to the track hence providing a fair test and therefore allowing me to hear the full detail of PCM?

---

Added on March 25, 2008, 2:32 pmAgreed there is a night and day difference between DD and LPCM, but the PS3 does bitstream PCM and well as LPCM. Bistream PCM and LPCM are identical. In both cases a pure signal is sent to the receiver.

Take a look at at the PS3 audio settings for bitstream and LPCM, they are identical. The PS3 bitstream and LPCM audio checkboxex both have PCM settings. Try sending PCM with bitstream and LPCM and your receiver will read PCM and in both cases and sound identical.

Try sending TrueHD with bitstream and you get the core DD 5.1. Try sending TrueHD with LPCM and you get PCM.

This post has been edited by megatron007: Mar 25 2008, 02:32 PM

since when got LCPM???

aiyoh, its understood lar

sorry i dont...

if u don, how do u know, why u ask since wen got LCPM?
u shud hve asked, wat is LCPM

This post has been edited by rx330: Mar 25 2008, 02:48 PM