does it cost a lot to take up architecture?
Art & Design So you're interested in ARCHITECTURE? Version 2, A guide to becoming an Architect.
Art & Design So you're interested in ARCHITECTURE? Version 2, A guide to becoming an Architect.
|
|
Apr 16 2008, 08:36 PM
Return to original view | Post
#21
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
266 posts Joined: Jul 2007 |
does it cost a lot to take up architecture?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 16 2008, 09:03 PM
Return to original view | Post
#22
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
266 posts Joined: Jul 2007 |
per sem means per year or?
|
|
|
Apr 16 2008, 10:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#23
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
266 posts Joined: Jul 2007 |
QUOTE(azarimy @ Apr 16 2008, 10:07 PM) local IPTS can cost between RM8k - 16k per year. the fees, and the tuition fees, are count separately?UK schools are currently has an average of GBP10k to 12k per year. australian schools cost something around AUD17-25k per year. these are only for the fees; does not include living costs, equipments or whatever else u need for studying. seriously though, i have no idea wats the difference between the 2 This post has been edited by aprisis: Apr 16 2008, 10:27 PM |
|
|
Apr 17 2008, 10:50 AM
Return to original view | Post
#24
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
266 posts Joined: Jul 2007 |
|
|
|
Apr 17 2008, 09:14 PM
Return to original view | Post
#25
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
266 posts Joined: Jul 2007 |
QUOTE(azarimy @ Apr 17 2008, 08:47 PM) » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « |
|
|
Apr 17 2008, 09:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#26
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
266 posts Joined: Jul 2007 |
QUOTE(azarimy @ Apr 17 2008, 09:35 PM) what do u mean "without the need to get a job first"? u must be some prodigy to be offered a job even before u graduated ofcourse we've got to be employed by an office first and here i am thinking if i wound end up jobless if i take the course |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 18 2008, 04:18 PM
Return to original view | Post
#27
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
266 posts Joined: Jul 2007 |
QUOTE(azarimy @ Apr 17 2008, 10:20 PM) nope. it happens all the time, especially for established schools. remember, most of my lecturers have their own firms. my boss and two of his associates were all ex-lecturers of UTM. the associates are now in UM (PM saari omar and mr. asrul mahjuddin). all were my lecturers. so all u need to do is exhibit ur qualities (short of bodek, coz i dont do bodek), and they will pick u right before u graduate. so its quite unlikely that i will menganggur after graduating? this is why u WANT to go to established schools, bcoz the contacts the lecturers could give u. nope. just a lame-ass 2nd class upper. i got 3.45 during my diploma. |
|
|
Apr 18 2008, 05:54 PM
Return to original view | Post
#28
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
266 posts Joined: Jul 2007 |
but i thought architects could work pass the retirement age? that time will they still be under a firm or?
|
|
|
Apr 18 2008, 08:16 PM
Return to original view | Post
#29
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
266 posts Joined: Jul 2007 |
i looked through taylor's, and found that they offer Diploma in Architectural Technology.
does that mean i wont be learning architecture as a whole? This post has been edited by aprisis: Apr 18 2008, 08:55 PM |
|
|
Apr 28 2008, 03:34 PM
Return to original view | Post
#30
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
266 posts Joined: Jul 2007 |
izit possible to enter Diploma in this field right after SPM using my trial results?
This post has been edited by aprisis: Apr 28 2008, 03:38 PM |
|
|
Apr 28 2008, 06:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#31
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
266 posts Joined: Jul 2007 |
i saw this taylor's advertisement in my school. it says Diploma in Architectural Technology. does this mean i'll be studying architecture in technological concept and not as a whole?
|
|
|
Apr 28 2008, 06:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#32
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
266 posts Joined: Jul 2007 |
do u think its advisable to go for architecture in taylor's? and i'm quite confuse now. the chart on the very 1st page says 6 years but its 5 years in the ad.
btw, does any1 know where i can buy the thin easy bending type of wood used for model making? in need for stage setup urgently |
|
|
Apr 28 2008, 06:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#33
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
266 posts Joined: Jul 2007 |
i'm not so sure bout these. but from what i gathered.
diploma 3 levels. that means 3 years. after that i can go Bachelor of Environment, 1 year, and finally Master of Architecture, 2 years. for the bachelor of environment, does it act like a bonus? |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 28 2008, 06:45 PM
Return to original view | Post
#34
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
266 posts Joined: Jul 2007 |
for a while i was thinking, 'master of architecture=masters?'
for BEnv, i heard it needs 60% in work for them to grant a place in melbourne, is it? and what if i take A levels? i'll be skipping a year in diploma? just that? yeah and thanks for ur patience 6 years..i'll be in my mid twenties by the time.. This post has been edited by aprisis: Apr 28 2008, 06:46 PM |
|
|
Apr 28 2008, 07:31 PM
Return to original view | Post
#35
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
266 posts Joined: Jul 2007 |
gosh, i was actually joking when i said MArch=masters degree.
i'm actually planning to go for diploma instead of A-levels. but my counselor insists that taking A-levels 1st is...better. so can i take the taylor's diploma after SPM using my forecast results (unless its bad, of which i hope i'll do better in SPM)? and diploma=foundation? and for me to be a qualified architect, is it a must to study through all six years? |
|
|
Apr 28 2008, 07:49 PM
Return to original view | Post
#36
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
266 posts Joined: Jul 2007 |
does LAM play a big role in becoming an architect? what if i decided to work in other places right after my studies? will i be taking examinations with the body of the place? |
|
|
Apr 28 2008, 08:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#37
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
266 posts Joined: Jul 2007 |
crap typo i actually meant diploma not A-levels
does part 3>Masters? what does practicing actually means? is it like, working in a firm for a specified durations? Added on April 28, 2008, 8:01 pmoh, if i take the taylor's path, do i have to study through all six years in a shot ? This post has been edited by aprisis: Apr 28 2008, 08:01 PM |
|
|
Apr 29 2008, 03:57 PM
Return to original view | Post
#38
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
266 posts Joined: Jul 2007 |
QUOTE(azarimy @ Apr 28 2008, 08:11 PM) yes, part 3 is bigger than masters. although, some UK universities nowadays have a special masters programme that earns u a part 3 upon graduation. those programmes include practical work as well, so it is normally about 2 years. u do need a part 2 before going for part 3. and since australian part 2 are nowadays awarded via masters, then yes, u will have 2 masters degrees at the end of the day what does that mean? but elsewhere in the world, u dont need a masters to sit for part 3. but it does mean u will need to practice for at least 2-3 years. practice here means working in the office doing architectural/design jobs. when u're ready to apply for part 3, u will be issued a log book that consists of everything u need to achieve in order to qualify for the exam. some people take 6 months to complete the requirement, others take 10 years. it depends on what kinda job u do. so it's not just about how long u've worked, but specifically, what work did u do? and finally, taylor's path is divided into 3 segments: diploma, part 1 and part 2. u could take it in one go, or u could take a break in between them. it's totally up to u. Added on April 28, 2008, 8:13 pm yes. but there will be some credit transfers that u would need to do. dont expect to jump straight to final year degree though. is completing the requirements as simple as working in the office for some time? |
|
|
Apr 29 2008, 05:10 PM
Return to original view | Post
#39
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
266 posts Joined: Jul 2007 |
QUOTE(azarimy @ Apr 29 2008, 04:44 PM) the requirement is quite large and encompassing. the problem here is if the office u're practicing at only focuses on one specific job, or only allows u to focus on one specific job. some of the small offices are just stuck with house renovations and hardly ever gets a full design-from-scratch jobs. in such offices, u'll be hard pressed to fulfill the other parts of the requirements. so..it's better to be a jack of all trades?in other offices, usually large ones, they prefer specializations where u are put where u're really good at. what if u're really good with computers and producing drawings? it means u'll hardly meet any clients, consultants or suppliers, let alone going for site visits or construction appraisals. so how do u fulfill those requirements? hence why i said it depends on what job u do, not how long u do it. if u keep repeating doing production drawings for even 10 years, u still wont qualify for a part 3. |
|
|
Apr 29 2008, 05:50 PM
Return to original view | Post
#40
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
266 posts Joined: Jul 2007 |
i see.
azarimy, i was wondering if u complete all six (or seven) years at a time or separately? |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0637sec
0.96
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 13th December 2025 - 10:27 AM |