Intel Penryn Overclocking Thread, Toasting next gen 45nm babes ~
|
|
 Feb 23 2008, 11:25 PM
|
 
VIP
8,788 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur    
|
QUOTE(IcEMoCHa @ Feb 23 2008, 11:24 PM) hmm.. how about ur E8200? does it need lots of vcore for stability? My current E8200 is a much better overclocker than my previous E8400. It needs 1.4V to be stable @ 4ghz and I'm now trying for more   |
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 24 2008, 12:41 AM
|
 
Senior Member
1,051 posts Joined: Feb 2005 From: Somewhere Out There 
|
@icemocha
what i was saying is, your board is hunger for more FSB, dun let ur board cry  Ur very lucky eh, same batch as mine  |
|
|
Feb 24 2008, 01:17 AM
|
Senior Member
4,947 posts Joined: Nov 2007 
|
QUOTE(clawhammer @ Feb 23 2008, 11:25 PM) My current E8200 is a much better overclocker than my previous E8400. It needs 1.4V to be stable @ 4ghz and I'm now trying for more ~.~ Mine can't even stable at 3.92ghz with 1.4v...  |
|
|
Feb 24 2008, 01:29 AM
|
|
VIP
8,788 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur
|
QUOTE(Silverfire @ Feb 24 2008, 01:17 AM) ~.~ Mine can't even stable at 3.92ghz with 1.4v... You're using E8400? |
|
|
Feb 24 2008, 01:42 AM
|
|
Senior Member
4,947 posts Joined: Nov 2007
|
QUOTE(clawhammer @ Feb 24 2008, 01:29 AM) You're using E8400? Yeah... I'm using E8400. |
|
|
Feb 24 2008, 01:43 AM
|
 
Elite
4,746 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Speed rule
|
QUOTE(Silverfire @ Feb 23 2008, 10:57 PM) Must be ET E8400 Q746a,right?   |
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 24 2008, 01:46 AM
|
|
Senior Member
4,947 posts Joined: Nov 2007
|
Q743 I think...
|
|
|
Feb 24 2008, 02:40 AM
|
Senior Member
1,406 posts Joined: Jun 2007
|
@bro clawhammer..u said better go for ip35-e..then i can safe my budget..now for the proc,e8200 or e8400..i just want to be stable at 4ghz only using tuniq tower
 |
|
|
Feb 24 2008, 02:48 AM
|
|
Senior Member
4,947 posts Joined: Nov 2007
|
QUOTE(alive88 @ Feb 24 2008, 02:40 AM) @bro clawhammer..u said better go for ip35-e..then i can safe my budget..now for the proc,e8200 or e8400..i just want to be stable at 4ghz only using tuniq tower 4Ghz stable must depend on the processor's quality... Like mine, hardly can touch 4ghz -.-" |
|
|
Feb 24 2008, 02:50 AM
|
|
Senior Member
1,406 posts Joined: Jun 2007
|
it depends on the week manufactured or stepping?
|
|
|
Feb 24 2008, 02:58 AM
|
|
Senior Member
4,947 posts Joined: Nov 2007
|
QUOTE(alive88 @ Feb 24 2008, 02:50 AM) it depends on the week manufactured or stepping? Batch... So far Q743XXXX batch is the most awesome batch. |
|
|
Feb 24 2008, 03:27 AM
|
|
Elite
4,746 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Speed rule
|
I think Q746 is quite good.Most of the processor i think can touch 4ghz.
|
|
|
Feb 24 2008, 03:38 AM
|
|
VIP
8,788 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur
|
QUOTE(OC4/3 @ Feb 24 2008, 03:27 AM) I think Q746 is quite good.Most of the processor i think can touch 4ghz. My E8400 earlier is a Q746 and yes, it touches 4ghz but needs quite a bit of voltage and it doesn't overclock any better than 4.2Ghz stable.Btw, I came across this: http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=318677 E8400 @ 5.1Ghz on Kingston RAM, Asus Commando His batch number is L748A142. Btw, he's doing all these on Tuniq Tower 120.This post has been edited by clawhammer: Feb 24 2008, 04:57 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 24 2008, 08:10 AM
|
Senior Member
653 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Originated From Hell. Status: Lazy.
|
QUOTE(clawhammer @ Feb 24 2008, 03:38 AM) My E8400 earlier is a Q746 and yes, it touches 4ghz but needs quite a bit of voltage and it doesn't overclock any better than 4.2Ghz stable. My old E8200 able to manage 4ghz at minimal volatage increase. Btw, I came across this: http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=318677 E8400 @ 5.1Ghz on Kingston RAM, Asus Commando His batch number is L748A142. Btw, he's doing all these on Tuniq Tower 120. |
|
|
Feb 24 2008, 10:26 AM
|
Senior Member
1,988 posts Joined: Aug 2005 From: Puchong, Selangor
|
QUOTE(AoiNatsume @ Feb 24 2008, 12:41 AM) @icemocha will do tat later haha... Btw how do I get as low vcore stable as possible?what i was saying is, your board is hunger for more FSB, dun let ur board cry Ur very lucky eh, same batch as mine Added on February 24, 2008, 10:28 am QUOTE(OC4/3 @ Feb 24 2008, 03:27 AM) I think Q746 is quite good.Most of the processor i think can touch 4ghz. lol...my batch is Q748.. Its performing nicely..This post has been edited by IcEMoCHa: Feb 24 2008, 10:28 AM |
|
|
Feb 24 2008, 10:29 AM
|
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005
|
QUOTE(alive88 @ Feb 24 2008, 02:50 AM) it depends on the week manufactured or stepping? stepping all same onlythe main factor should be the weeks manufactured |
|
|
Feb 24 2008, 03:13 PM
|
|
Elite
4,746 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Speed rule
|
QUOTE(clawhammer @ Feb 24 2008, 03:38 AM) My E8400 earlier is a Q746 and yes, it touches 4ghz but needs quite a bit of voltage and it doesn't overclock any better than 4.2Ghz stable. So L748A is good?What about Q748A?Q746A i have saw quite some people doing 4.7ghz like that(Suicide).Btw, I came across this: http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=318677 E8400 @ 5.1Ghz on Kingston RAM, Asus Commando His batch number is L748A142. Btw, he's doing all these on Tuniq Tower 120.Added on February 24, 2008, 3:15 pmThe best is Q748A?If so i can get it cheaply.Confirm good,Q748A? This post has been edited by OC4/3: Feb 24 2008, 03:15 PM |
|
|
Feb 24 2008, 04:07 PM
|
Senior Member
2,751 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Taiping
|
lol...i tell u lar...even same batch sumtimes dun work really wel...jus my 2cents
|
|
|
Feb 24 2008, 04:10 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,988 posts Joined: Aug 2005 From: Puchong, Selangor
|
all depends on luck 1 la...
|
|
|
Feb 24 2008, 04:28 PM
|
|
VIP
8,788 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur
|
QUOTE(seanlimys @ Feb 24 2008, 04:07 PM) lol...i tell u lar...even same batch sumtimes dun work really wel...jus my 2cents Yes, this is very true. Some people thinks batch number is the indicator of a good overclockability chip but in actual fact, it's not. Luck is a better way to this |
| Change to: |  0.1320sec
 0.79
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 17th December 2025 - 06:49 AM |
Quote