Yes, you can.
For CW, buy through broker house.
For ordinary W, generally, it is issued by the listed company itself, and giving out the right to subscribe to the shareholders across.

I am not familiar with M2U,

But those investment bank like OSK, Hwang, etc. just tell them/your remisier/broker that you want to buy those CWs (when there is new issue time/IPO), which normally come in 500 lot per tranche.
For W, you need to be existing shareholder or buy through the renouncable warrant right (if there is) to buy the W.

This post has been edited by cherroy: Apr 20 2012, 11:08 AM

1. By cheque that sent through ordinary mail, or they directly bank into the account pre-registered with your CDS.
You do not need to claim them, company registrar will automatically do it. Just sit home and wait it arrived at your mailbox or into your account.

2. As posted 1, whether what company use what method, so far we can only know from existing shareholders experience. There is no list of which company is using ordinary mail to send the cheque or through Giro bank into account directly(e-dividend).
But more and more company is using and migrating to e-dividend method.

If you bought before 3 May, yes you are entitled for the right issue, (not share)
You don't own the share until you subscribe the right issue which cost Rm0.50 per share.
You do not own the share and free warrant until you subscribe it.

The right is renounceable means you can sell off the right if do not intend to pay for/subscribe the right at RM0.50.
It will be traded for the period stated and possible under the code name with behind -OR.

Yes.

Shareholder are pre-allocated how much the right share they entitled in the first place, which is proposed and approved prior before.

Renounceable just means, you can sell off the right, if one doesn't wish to subscribe the right shares.

There is not such thing of renounceable share., but renounceable right issue share.

NO.

CDS is attached to individual broker house, it is not cross linked-able (at least until now as far as I knew).

In general. For bank

Interest income - income generated through interest charged on bank loan given out.
Interest expense - interest paid to the depositor or whatever money borrowed by bank to give loan etc.

Non-interest income - those charges imposed on depositors account or whatever service provided. For eg. Annual free on credit card, charges on Card issued etc.

Sorry, me not familiar with islamic banking reporting.

There is no exact definition of it.
Like A is blue chip, B is not as there is no criteria to determine whether a stock is classified as blue chip or not.

It is just a general term market used to refer a stock that is financial fundamental sound, large cap etc.

There is no minimum amount.

Only got minimum amount commission charges. Refer to FAQ topic on post 4 on charges incurred.

Yes, possible to invest with 2k.

Yes, you need a broker, or remisier.

It depends.

If there is mandatory General offer to acquire the shares that Company B doesn't own, then Company B will offer you to sell to them at Rm1.20.
If company B just acquire some stake that does not trigger the MGO, your share price value still subjected open market demand and supply pricing.

---

Added on October 15, 2012, 9:36 pmThe answer is not as straight forward unless it is an MGO.
or acquire the entire stake of the company.

This post has been edited by cherroy: Oct 15 2012, 09:36 PM

Mandatory General Offer.

Yes, it is the same share.
Dividend reinvestment plan, do not need to fork out a single cent.
It just use portion of your entitled dividend to buy the share or in other word, instead of receiving Rm500 dividend, now you receiving RM300, while the RM200 is used to buy the share.

Market give valuation (stock price) primary based on the company ability to generate profit / dividend to the shareholders.

NTA/NAV is secondary issue, as it only matter when company liquidate time.

That's why we see BAT is trading at way higher than its NTA because it can generate handsome profit/dividend to shareholders.
While we see some stocks are trading at below NTA, due to profit generated is not as good or some making loss.

This ratio is not that meaningful as difference industry has different situation.
For eg.
Steel company need massive capex to produce a sale generally so it may have higher NTA than a servicing company that do not require much capex to generate the same sale level.

This post has been edited by cherroy: Mar 23 2013, 11:08 AM

NTA is important to WB, because WB is buying the company (it is also share, but if buy enough share to control the company, generally people called buy the company) . WB can buy stock under NTA, and control the company, even want to liquidate or do whatever to the company asset also can.

Retailer cannot. Retailers just buying share of the company, not buying the company.
If management doesn't want to share the profit made, doesn't want to give a single cent of dividend, even the company earn billions, if stock price doesn't react, retailers earn nothing

If solely based on NTA nd PE, a lot of red chips in KLSE must be top target, as a lot are trading way below NTA (even cash level), and single digit PE.
Want?

Yes, NTA is important, but if management doesn't want to share the profit made aka increase NTA (tons of accumulated profit which make the NTA higher and higher), nothing retailers can do about it.
While WB has stake and has a say on company, which it is totally different scenario than a retailer.

This post has been edited by cherroy: Mar 23 2013, 03:01 PM

You won't, as the lowest one can key in the amount is RM7, aka a 30% movement limit for a trading day, so stop dreaming.

It depends on the queue situation.

If seller is Q at 1.10 with 10 lots, while buyer hit 1.20 with 20 lot, then the matched transaction should be at 1.20, aka seller manage to sell at 1.20, despite put 1.10

While if seller Q is at 1.10 with 1000 lots, while buyer hit 1.20 with 20 lots, the probably it will be matched at 1.10 only. Buyer get 1.10, despite key in 1.20

Correct me if I am wrong.
It is always depended on the system adopted by listing provider, aka KLSE locally. While in other bourses, different rule may be adopted.

If not mistaken, there is no company rules or listing rule said that company cannot invested their money into whatever investment product.

But if company do invest in bond, derivatives, or whatever, normally it can be seen in the balance sheet.
So check the annual report and Q report for any development on the issue.
It is the power of shareholder to question the management board whatever investment that the company has made.

Sorry, not well verse with US history.
But derivatives product is becoming more sophisticated since 90's.
Yes, those are investment bankers, not ordinary commercial bank.

As far as I knew, no or very little exposure, even got, more like an indirect route, because currently financial world is inter-related.

The 2008 crisis was about credit freeze. Aka banks did not trust each other, result in inter-bank lending cannot function. Everyone fear to lend money out.
In a modern financial system, you need interbank lending to operate to provide daily liquidity for bank to operate.

Bank do not hold on every deposit they had, they lend it out,what if suddenly depositors want to withdraw money in big sum that exceed bank cash level, what they do?
They lend from other bank to give the cash to the depositor.
If one day, no bank want to lend them?
How, tell depositor no money?
Then confidence on the bank collapse instantly.
Once no confidence on the bank, it can cause bank run and result in the bank become insolvency.

Once the news Lehman came out, everyone suspicious on each other, result in freeze in inter-bank lending activities, causing even more stress on banks across.

The crisis is no longer here (2008 global financial crisis), most banks have adequate capital ratio already as compared 2008 time.
The problem currently US has is the fiscal deficit, and debt, no about banks issue anymore.