Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

100 Pages « < 21 22 23 24 25 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Microsoft Windows 7 Beta

views
     
FarCry3r
post Dec 26 2008, 06:51 PM

Where did my ♥ go?
*******
Senior Member
6,543 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Miri



QUOTE(defaultname365 @ Dec 26 2008, 05:48 PM)
Huh... wats with all the tension. Is the Public Beta upon us ? When ?

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


It is a fact that Windows 7 is not as bloated as Vista and is a more stabilized version as seen here.

I am very sure its going to be Windows XP vs. Windows 7 head-to-head...

"Its going to be a far better Vista experience on Windows 7 " -defaultname365
*
In about two or three weeks more... I can feel the h33t icon_idea.gif
Skylinestar
post Dec 26 2008, 06:51 PM

Mega Duck
********
All Stars
10,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Sarawak
i'm hoping that software that runs in win winXP will run in Win7 flawlessly.
TechnoDude94
post Dec 26 2008, 08:42 PM

Happiness Advocate
*******
Senior Member
6,738 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
From: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia | Eau Claire, Wisconsin


QUOTE(defaultname365 @ Dec 26 2008, 05:48 PM)
Huh... wats with all the tension. Is the Public Beta upon us ? When ?

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


It is a fact that Windows 7 is not as bloated as Vista and is a more stabilized version as seen here.

I am very sure its going to be Windows XP vs. Windows 7 head-to-head...

"Its going to be a far better Vista experience on Windows 7 " -defaultname365
*
I agree with you. Actually, Windows 7 should be going with Windows Vista head-to-head because Windows Vista was supposed to go with Windows XP head-to-head but failed.

QUOTE(Skylinestar @ Dec 26 2008, 06:51 PM)
i'm hoping that software that runs in win winXP will run in Win7 flawlessly.
*
I'm sad that I've to tell you this but after trying Windows 7 Build 6956, I've experienced the inability to launch certain programs properly. cry.gif
eXPeri3nc3
post Dec 26 2008, 10:24 PM

It's coming! 3ɔu3ıɹǝdxǝ ♥
*******
Senior Member
9,257 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Not so sure myself Status: 1+3+3=7



QUOTE(TechnoDude94 @ Dec 26 2008, 08:42 PM)
I agree with you. Actually, Windows 7 should be going with Windows Vista head-to-head because Windows Vista was supposed to go with Windows XP head-to-head but failed.
I'm sad that I've to tell you this but after trying Windows 7 Build 6956, I've experienced the inability to launch certain programs properly. cry.gif
*
What kind of certain programs are you talking about?
TechnoDude94
post Dec 26 2008, 10:35 PM

Happiness Advocate
*******
Senior Member
6,738 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
From: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia | Eau Claire, Wisconsin


QUOTE(eXPeri3nc3 @ Dec 26 2008, 10:24 PM)
What kind of certain programs are you talking about?
*
Comodo Firewall, Admuncher, Daemon Tools, Raxco Perfect Disk, Nero 9 (Can install but can't launch) don't work in Windows 7 Build 6956 except Nero 9.
FarCry3r
post Dec 27 2008, 01:01 AM

Where did my ♥ go?
*******
Senior Member
6,543 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Miri



QUOTE(TechnoDude94 @ Dec 26 2008, 10:35 PM)
Comodo Firewall, Admuncher, Daemon Tools, Raxco Perfect Disk, Nero 9 (Can install but can't launch) don't work in Windows 7 Build 6956 except Nero 9.
*
For me, Kaspersky AV/IS works without a hitch. Paragon Partition Manager 9.0 works flawlessly, but Nero 8 & 9 both didn't work at all, I have to use UltraISO for my burning need. And oh, Visual Basic 6.0 still works, just need to disable DWM when running to avoid lagging in IDE.
Skylinestar
post Dec 27 2008, 09:06 AM

Mega Duck
********
All Stars
10,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Sarawak
those are the software that will definitely be replaced with newer version. so, i'm not so worry about these. Nero comes out with new version with every windows release.

i'm worrying about some engineering software such as Prokon (civil engineering app for my sister), IBM AFP Printfile Viewer (really old app sweat.gif as document viewer used in my office, till today there's no alternative) and StarOffice (used by my mum as government has gone Sun apps due to lower price). sad.gif

This post has been edited by Skylinestar: Dec 27 2008, 09:07 AM
FarCry3r
post Dec 27 2008, 01:20 PM

Where did my ♥ go?
*******
Senior Member
6,543 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Miri



QUOTE(Skylinestar @ Dec 27 2008, 09:06 AM)
those are the software that will definitely be replaced with newer version. so, i'm not so worry about these. Nero comes out with new version with every windows release.

i'm worrying about some engineering software such as Prokon (civil engineering app for my sister), IBM AFP Printfile Viewer (really old app sweat.gif as document viewer used in my office, till today there's no alternative) and StarOffice (used by my mum as government has gone Sun apps due to lower price). sad.gif
*
Software suite such as StarOffice will sure to have upgrades to support Windows7. If your IBM AFP Printfile Viewer can run on Vista, there's good chance it'll still running in Windows7. icon_rolleyes.gif
TechnoDude94
post Dec 27 2008, 02:26 PM

Happiness Advocate
*******
Senior Member
6,738 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
From: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia | Eau Claire, Wisconsin


QUOTE(Skylinestar @ Dec 27 2008, 09:06 AM)
those are the software that will definitely be replaced with newer version. so, i'm not so worry about these. Nero comes out with new version with every windows release.

i'm worrying about some engineering software such as Prokon (civil engineering app for my sister), IBM AFP Printfile Viewer (really old app sweat.gif as document viewer used in my office, till today there's no alternative) and StarOffice (used by my mum as government has gone Sun apps due to lower price). sad.gif
*
I still can't get Nero 9 working in Build 6956, darn it. doh.gif Urm, as for StarOffice, someone should recommend that they use OpenOffice. tongue.gif
defaultname365
post Dec 27 2008, 02:33 PM

Windows® 8.1 | Xbox 360™ | PlayStation® 4
******
Senior Member
1,098 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
QUOTE(TechnoDude94 @ Dec 26 2008, 08:42 PM)
I agree with you. Actually, Windows 7 should be going with Windows Vista head-to-head because Windows Vista was supposed to go with Windows XP head-to-head but failed.
*
I said Windows 7 vs. Windows XP. You see, since Windows Vista did not garner the support from XP users, the question remains : Can Windows 7 garner the support of XP users this time ?

Thus, it is going to be Windows 7 vs. Windows XP (not Vista).

However, early indication is that Windows 7 is way smoother and more... agile than Vista, but plagued with compatibility issues. Since they are doing things so early (Nvidia + ATi alreadi working on drivers at this stage...), it would not surprise me that big software developers also are 'already' making their software compatible for Windows 7. Just wait and see... soon, all the major software will work in Windows 7.



TechnoDude94
post Dec 27 2008, 02:46 PM

Happiness Advocate
*******
Senior Member
6,738 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
From: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia | Eau Claire, Wisconsin


QUOTE(defaultname365 @ Dec 27 2008, 02:33 PM)
I said Windows 7 vs. Windows XP. You see, since Windows Vista did not garner the support from XP users, the question remains : Can Windows 7 garner the support of XP users this time ?

Thus, it is going to be Windows 7 vs. Windows XP (not Vista).

However, early indication is that Windows 7 is way smoother and more... agile than Vista, but plagued with compatibility issues. Since they are doing things so early (Nvidia + ATi alreadi working on drivers at this stage...), it would not surprise me that big software developers also are 'already' making their software compatible for Windows 7. Just wait and see... soon, all the major software will work in Windows 7.
*
Yeap, it's not Windows' fault that a lot of software is incompatible with their OSes. It's the software manufacturer that aren't making their initiative to make an update/patch or new version of software that's compatible with the new OS.
a_pitx
post Dec 27 2008, 03:43 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
14 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
From: [P]ear[L]+[I]slan[D]


i've tried windows 7...
have a prob with generic host...
when i connected to the internet,suddenly the error popup then i will lost the connection...
need to restart my pc then i can connect again...
the prob occur many times so i prefer to install other windows version...
but i love the new win 7...if someone have the fine win 7 links pls pm me...
TechnoDude94
post Dec 27 2008, 03:49 PM

Happiness Advocate
*******
Senior Member
6,738 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
From: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia | Eau Claire, Wisconsin


QUOTE(a_pitx @ Dec 27 2008, 03:43 PM)
i've tried windows 7...
have a prob with generic host...
when i connected to the internet,suddenly the error popup then i will lost the connection...
need to restart my pc then i can connect again...
the prob occur many times so i prefer to install other windows version...
but i love the new win 7...if someone have the fine win 7 links pls pm me...
*
I've got no problem with generic host. May I know what version is your build?
FarCry3r
post Dec 27 2008, 07:38 PM

Where did my ♥ go?
*******
Senior Member
6,543 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Miri



QUOTE(defaultname365 @ Dec 27 2008, 02:33 PM)
I said Windows 7 vs. Windows XP. You see, since Windows Vista did not garner the support from XP users, the question remains : Can Windows 7 garner the support of XP users this time ?

Thus, it is going to be Windows 7 vs. Windows XP (not Vista).

However, early indication is that Windows 7 is way smoother and more... agile than Vista, but plagued with compatibility issues. Since they are doing things so early (Nvidia + ATi alreadi working on drivers at this stage...), it would not surprise me that big software developers also are 'already' making their software compatible for Windows 7. Just wait and see... soon, all the major software will work in Windows 7.
*
You see, sometimes all the developer needs to do to make their software running in Windows7 is to change the OS version number detection. Add Windows7 version number to supported list and it's good to go.
TechnoDude94
post Dec 27 2008, 08:34 PM

Happiness Advocate
*******
Senior Member
6,738 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
From: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia | Eau Claire, Wisconsin


QUOTE(FarCry3r @ Dec 27 2008, 07:38 PM)
You see, sometimes all the developer needs to do to make their software running in Windows7 is to change the OS version number detection. Add Windows7 version number to supported list and it's good to go.
*
Does it have anything to do with Windows Installer or Installershield thing?
convivencia
post Dec 27 2008, 08:39 PM

idiot
*******
Senior Member
2,675 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

There are hundreds of thousands, if not MILLIONS of PC applications out there.

Just because of those "BIG DEVELOPERS" making their applications compatible with Win7 doesn't mean that XP users will flock to Win7 en masse.

The one thing that makes XP successful is because many applications that run on Win98 and WinME also run on XP.

But looks like Microsoft never learn from their mistake. They keep on shooting off their own toes.

It's sad. Really sad.
FarCry3r
post Dec 27 2008, 08:44 PM

Where did my ♥ go?
*******
Senior Member
6,543 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Miri



QUOTE(TechnoDude94 @ Dec 27 2008, 08:34 PM)
Does it have anything to do with Windows Installer or Installershield thing?
*
The installer checking for correct version number of OS before allowing install is one thing. The application themself sometimes still check. And sometimes it just refuse to run on "unknown" version of Windows, in this case Windows 7


Added on December 27, 2008, 8:53 pm
QUOTE(convivencia @ Dec 27 2008, 08:39 PM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

There are hundreds of thousands, if not MILLIONS of PC applications out there.

Just because of those "BIG DEVELOPERS" making their applications compatible with Win7 doesn't mean that XP users will flock to Win7 en masse.

The one thing that makes XP successful is because many applications that run on Win98 and WinME also run on XP.

But looks like Microsoft never learn from their mistake. They keep on shooting off their own toes.

It's sad. Really sad.
*
There you got it wrong. Initially, Windows 98/Me applications are not compatible with Windows XP, most of them. They can barely run on Windows XP without any problem(s). Don't believe me? Turn your clock way back to 2001 or 2002 and see if I'm bullshitting. Microsoft already learnt from their mistake with Windows Vista. That's why it's setting things straight and also why you won't see Windows7 version numbering is not 7.x, but still 6.x. I don't see why developers wouldn't change some bits on their code to support Windows7 as Windows7 codebase are same as Vista, only improved.

This post has been edited by FarCry3r: Dec 27 2008, 08:53 PM
allvin
post Dec 28 2008, 01:13 PM

......
*******
Senior Member
4,506 posts

Joined: Aug 2005

btw guise, build7000 just release. lulz.. anyone try out yet?
FarCry3r
post Dec 28 2008, 01:22 PM

Where did my ♥ go?
*******
Senior Member
6,543 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Miri



QUOTE(allvin @ Dec 28 2008, 01:13 PM)
btw guise, build7000 just release. lulz.. anyone try out yet?
*
Still FTPing from reliable source... 7 more hours to go. rolleyes.gif
dinodragon
post Dec 28 2008, 01:40 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
126 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
all new profit for application software ya.. need to design new version so that can compatible with vienna... hehe....

100 Pages « < 21 22 23 24 25 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0264sec    0.73    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 22nd December 2025 - 08:45 AM