Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Couple pension monthly RM7k + RM1m, x cukup..

views
     
submergedx
post Dec 2 2025, 09:16 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,126 posts

Joined: Jun 2015
of course not enough la

you give me 5m i also say not enough

diu
max_cavalera
post Dec 2 2025, 09:24 PM

rebirth
*******
Senior Member
5,613 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: Cyberjaya, Shah Alam, Ipoh



QUOTE(vhs @ Dec 2 2025, 06:42 PM)
At least Japan has universal health care for all citizens to reduce their medical expense burdens. Over here, you either pay for expensive insurance with ceiling cap and unexpected hidden exclusion clauses, or prepare for a bomb expense, or prepare to wait in a long queue for critical illness treatment. Most of the biggest worry will come from unexpected medical expense in the golden years.

See the thread here:
https://forum.lowyat.net/topic/5546888

Meaning you pay for expensive private insurance still not guarantee it will help you when the time comes.

That's why universal health care has some advantages.
*
The usual /k argument other country always better than us.

Do you know their universal healthcare, theres a mandatory deduction from their payslip? It almost similar to UK style healtchare insurance tax on their payslip. Mesia gomen got take % monthly from ur payslip wonot too fund our free kkm singgek healthcare?

It depends a bit on the prefecture in Japan — but here’s a typical case for a salaried worker paying for universal healthcare / social insurance in 2025. 
For health insurance under Japan Health Insurance Association (Kenko-Hoken), the employee share is about 4.95% of standard monthly salary. 
• If the employee is aged 40–64, there is an additional long-term/nursing-care insurance charge of around 0.8% (shared equally between employee and employer).


So in the future, you ok mesia gomen take 5%+ monthly from your payslip to fund your universal healthcare that you may or may not use?

This post has been edited by max_cavalera: Dec 2 2025, 09:30 PM
killdavid
post Dec 2 2025, 09:46 PM

Senior Satire Officer
******
Senior Member
1,636 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Vault 13



QUOTE(max_cavalera @ Dec 2 2025, 09:24 PM)
The usual /k argument other country always better than us.

Do you know their universal healthcare, theres a mandatory deduction from their payslip? It almost similar to UK style healtchare insurance tax on their payslip. Mesia gomen got take % monthly from ur payslip wonot too fund our free kkm singgek healthcare?

It depends a bit on the prefecture in Japan — but here’s a typical case for a salaried worker paying for universal healthcare / social insurance in 2025.  
For health insurance under Japan Health Insurance Association (Kenko-Hoken), the employee share is about 4.95% of standard monthly salary.  
• If the employee is aged 40–64, there is an additional long-term/nursing-care insurance charge of around 0.8% (shared equally between employee and employer).


So in the future, you ok mesia gomen take 5%+ monthly from your payslip to fund your universal healthcare that you may or may not use?
*
If health insurance keep going up then might as well implement this.
Save on med insurance and you can stamp out the insurance+private health care cartel that is sucking us dry
vhs
post Dec 2 2025, 09:47 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
90 posts

Joined: May 2022
QUOTE(max_cavalera @ Dec 2 2025, 09:24 PM)
The usual /k argument other country always better than us.

Do you know their universal healthcare, theres a mandatory deduction from their payslip? It almost similar to UK style healtchare insurance tax on their payslip. Mesia gomen got take % monthly from ur payslip wonot too fund our free kkm singgek healthcare?

It depends a bit on the prefecture in Japan — but here’s a typical case for a salaried worker paying for universal healthcare / social insurance in 2025.  
For health insurance under Japan Health Insurance Association (Kenko-Hoken), the employee share is about 4.95% of standard monthly salary.  
• If the employee is aged 40–64, there is an additional long-term/nursing-care insurance charge of around 0.8% (shared equally between employee and employer).


So in the future, you ok mesia gomen take 5%+ monthly from your payslip to fund your universal healthcare that you may or may not use?
*
Actually like it or not, you are going to get that deduction anyway for one reason or the other. By my point was not about this. My point was the worth of that amount that they are receiving, at least that does not have the additional worry that medical expenses gonna suddenly create a huge problem for them. Meanwhile same amount of money in Malaysia will have that hidden worry. Private health care insurance could be a substitute for a national health care plan, but there is always hidden concerns that when you truly need it, you cannot get your claim unlike a national health care which do not have such conditions. We already heard how Malaysia private health care can decide for you what kind of treatment you can get, instead of what is best for you.

This post has been edited by vhs: Dec 2 2025, 09:52 PM
max_cavalera
post Dec 2 2025, 09:49 PM

rebirth
*******
Senior Member
5,613 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: Cyberjaya, Shah Alam, Ipoh



QUOTE(killdavid @ Dec 2 2025, 10:46 PM)
If health insurance keep going up then might as well implement this.
Save on med insurance and you can stamp out the insurance+private health care cartel that is sucking us dry
*
I have no doubt in 5-10 years time mesia wont generate yinuf moneh to fully fund our kkm singgek annual budget expenditure.

But i think they will gradually cut ron95 subsidy in stages to cover the yearly increasing budget until absolute minimum.

Then once deficit grow larger. Theres no other choice but to charge national healthcare tax 2.5-5% from all our salary to help cover the kkm budget…

This post has been edited by max_cavalera: Dec 2 2025, 09:50 PM
killdavid
post Dec 2 2025, 09:51 PM

Senior Satire Officer
******
Senior Member
1,636 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Vault 13



QUOTE(max_cavalera @ Dec 2 2025, 09:49 PM)
I have no doubt in 5-10 years time mesia wont generate yinuf moneh to fully fund our kkm singgek annual budget expenditure.

But i think they will gradually cut ron95 subsidy in stages to cover the yearly increasing budget until absolute minimum.

Then once deficit grow larger. Theres no other choice but to charge national healthcare tax 2.5-5% from all our salary to help cover the kkm budget…
*
Kkm singgit only for senior citizens.
Then the young not burdended by their parent's healthcare
patt_sue
post Dec 2 2025, 10:15 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
867 posts

Joined: Feb 2005


go retire in thailand or vietnam
MR_alien
post Dec 2 2025, 10:36 PM

Mr.Alien on the loss
*******
Senior Member
3,580 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
From: everywhere in sabah



lemme tell you what the real problem is
the real problem isn't money, it's mindset and perception

young people can travel just fine with minimal $$$
the problem with baby boomers is their perception of travel is shopping
that perception needs to change, you're travelling to see the world...NOT shopping

u already retired, you don't need to buy this and that for him and her

This post has been edited by MR_alien: Dec 2 2025, 10:37 PM
Justin.Loong
post Yesterday, 10:23 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,342 posts

Joined: Feb 2014


QUOTE(mrhulk @ Dec 2 2025, 08:56 PM)
how much to retire in malaysia?
*


QUOTE
The Employees Provident Fund's (EPF) move to raise the basic retirement savings benchmark to RM390,000 gives the public a sense of urgency to plan for their retirement.

Experts said despite the higher benchmark, those with basic retirement savings are still exposed to risks especially with the rise in inflation rates.

Bank Muamalat Malaysia Bhd chief economist Dr Mohd Afzanizam Abdul Rashid said the inflation rate tends to increase by an average of 2.5 per cent, which reduces the public's purchasing power.
"The new threshold would, to some degree, give some sense of urgency that Malaysian citizens need to really plan their retirement funds. Certainly every location would have a different cost of living and by extension, the ideal size for a retirement fund.

"I think the EPF is trying to promote granularity in setting the right benchmark for having a comfortable level of funds when a person retires.
"This would also give the members a sense of urgency to build their retirement coffers by starting with being judicious whenever they plan to withdraw their money from EPF," he told Business Times.

Mohd Afzanizam said the new benchmark also alerts policy makers on ways to elevate wages that can be done through education and training.
"The government also needs to ensure that the country is competitive where the system will reward those who work hard and smart as they would bring greater productivity and profitability. The new yardstick would serve as a guidance so that the country would be able to avert the retirement crisis," he added.

According to the Retirement Income Adequacy (RIA) framework launched by the EPF on Thursday, based on current prices, a retiree at 60 will need RM390,000 to cover essential retirement needs; RM650,000 for a reasonable standard of living and RM1.3 million for greater financial security and independence for a higher quality of life. 

Universiti Kuala Lumpur Business School economic analyst, Associate Professor Aimi Zulhazmi Abdul Rashid said with savings of RM650,000, a retiree would need a monthly budget of RM3,611 for an average period of 15 years after retirement.
"It should be adequate for monthly expenses but not including loan payments for mortgage and hire-purchase loans and rental payments.
"Retirees should ideally have their own house that is fully paid by the end of their working career so that they will not be burdened by the monthly payment to banks."


However, realistically many of those living and working in Klang Valley are renting and unable to buy their own houses, he added.
Rising house prices in Klang Valley being the most expensive in the country seemed to be the main obstacle.

As for those with basic savings of RM350,000, he noted that an individual will need a monthly household income of RM1,944 for the next 15 years after retirement to cover basic necessities. 
"Living a low profile lifestyle may be the right positioning but still they are exposed to high risk from rising inflation rates yearly.
"Hence, the government assistance to provide living cost subsidies like fuel subsidy and others will be essential for their survival of living in Klang Valley," he said.

Source: EPF guide gives urgency to public's retirement plan: Economists [BTTV]

giftfre
post Yesterday, 10:28 AM

Control Macho
****
Junior Member
679 posts

Joined: Jul 2010



Here many couple pension also don't have 1mil la.
They can't imagine that amount, can't figure how it's feel like.

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0148sec    0.34    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 05:30 AM