Celcom Messed Up Its Japan DataPacket Route?, All Other Local Telcos Just Fine
|
|
 Jul 7 2025, 09:48 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#1
|
 
Senior Member
1,350 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: HEAVEN & HELL  
|
in your case, why not you sent a feedback report to the VPN company you using and asking them to contact upstream to do routing adjustment for egress and " not to use china mobile route " back to Celcom ASN. This post has been edited by heLL_bOy: Jul 7 2025, 09:48 PM iXora.ix liked this post
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 9 2025, 12:29 AM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member
1,350 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: HEAVEN & HELL
|
QUOTE(iXora.ix @ Jul 8 2025, 10:22 PM) you need to report 1st to celcom and also open ticket to skmm as well. they will contact you. this also same as me whereby celcom fiber connection to nearest zscaler vpn high ping My suggestion is just direct to zscaler and asking them to change route to another upstream is faster then file a report to ask ISP do change it. Normally route congestion mostly happen is from Source(Zscaler) to destination (Celcom). |
|
|
Jul 10 2025, 02:20 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member
1,350 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: HEAVEN & HELL
|
QUOTE(iXora.ix @ Jul 9 2025, 10:47 PM) ermm, I wanted to do this at first. but this is work vpn, and i need to raise to IT> IT raise to network team> raise to zscaler and so on. yeah understand that, but that was the fastest way to solved the issue in my opinion.  luckily it had been resolve  rather then waiting these ISP to change it was really wasting time and effort to explain to them which some might not understand what we want. This post has been edited by heLL_bOy: Jul 10 2025, 02:27 PM iXora.ix liked this post
|
|
|
Jul 11 2025, 12:30 AM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member
1,350 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: HEAVEN & HELL
|
QUOTE(petpenyubobo @ Jul 10 2025, 09:01 PM) It seems resolved but CelcomDiGi's IX peering in SG seems to get congested very easily during peak hours. i did a test on digi speedtest ip, its seem Digi ASN have better network routing at the moment compare to celcom ASNThe problem happens when it needs to route via Singapore or uses Equinix IX to route to its peers in not just SG but to other places such as Japan, US and other continents. Those who are on DiGi's AS4818 you'll have better access because of its 400Gbps connection to SG's Equinix. Usually if you were on DiGi Postpaid/Prepaid or Fibre previously, your IP block will be routed through this gateway. But if you're on AS10030 Celcom's gateway then touch luck. This are those who were previously from Celcom and all its MVNOs such as TuneTalk, XOX and BeONE.. Go to this website and check what is your ISP ASN under organization ASxxxx.. https://www.iplocation.net/myip https://ipinfo.io/what-is-my-ip |
|
|
Jul 11 2025, 12:46 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#5
|
|
Senior Member
1,350 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: HEAVEN & HELL
|
QUOTE(blacktubi @ Jul 11 2025, 09:27 AM) DiGi network team is quite competent actually, partly due to great training and leadership from Telenor back then i just wonder why dont they merge the network and expand their network in celcom side.Wouldn't say the same about Celcom Axiata |
|
|
Jul 13 2025, 01:09 AM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#6
|
|
Senior Member
1,350 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: HEAVEN & HELL
|
QUOTE(iXora.ix @ Jul 12 2025, 08:28 PM) actually for twitter (X) during night time also suffer slow internet for both fiber and cellular. not affected on digi cellular line btw last time unifi also having same issue, its seem now Celcom also in the list iXora.ix liked this post
|
|
|
Jul 16 2025, 05:14 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#7
|
|
Senior Member
1,350 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: HEAVEN & HELL
|
QUOTE(petpenyubobo @ Jul 16 2025, 12:46 PM) The key to them are the administrators strategic planning, compare the performing ones from Maxis, DiGi and even Yes vs Celcom and TM teams. even have big pipes if they doesnt know how to manage the traffic is useless also. I can said some of ISP always throw 1 side traffic into basket making all user into congestion mode.The earlier ones they had figured out that the secret key to congestion avoidance is to establish big pipes to Equinix SG/SGIX where most other regional ISPs are based there. If you take a look at Axiata Celcom and TM, by subscriber subscriber pool size they out to have very big pipes to these key exchanges but they are doing the opposite because of lousy planning by their sleeping administrators. for example, using single upstream or IX for ingress > 80% of the ISP route is using the same upstream or IX. that why they should have diversity on their upstream and balancing on each upstream or IX routing to avoid congestion. |
|
|
Jul 16 2025, 05:27 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#8
|
|
Senior Member
1,350 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: HEAVEN & HELL
|
QUOTE(petpenyubobo @ Jul 16 2025, 05:18 PM) Diversity and participation itself is already happening at Equinix SG/SGIX. The missing link is establishing big pipes before you can consider peering with regional players in Asia and the rest of the world. no matter how big is the pipe ISP have in Equinix or SGIX it doesnt really resolved the congestion in single party, if another party having small pipe for an example like M247 (they dont just serve 1 ISP or 1 users only in their traffic pipe).Without the connection you can't even start off well with good peering/upstream providers. the best way divert into different upstream or IX or the best choice is PNI with each others. |
| Change to: |  0.0147sec
 0.53
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 6th December 2025 - 08:27 PM |
Quote