Ukraine also has underground drones that can penetrate Nuclear Silos and explode them

Defuq u called this small terrorist attack? This is legitimate attack of invader’s military facility, done in most efficient way with precision.

Really topkek u guys keep following Russia narrative calling it terrorist attack. So only Russia’s daily missiles and bombing attack on Ukraine civilians targets are “legit warfare”?

Ukraine was promised protection against nuke attack when it gave up its nukes. I doubt Pudding dare to use nuke after failed invasion. Will the international community accept aggressor country to launch nuke due to frustrating invasion?

are those the same sensors used by Atto car doors?

there's only 1 way to find out, i hope whoever testing that had the same sarcasm mentality like you

The thing is your assumptions are, as I mentioned earlier, naive. It's not for nothing that both cold war countries refrained from nukes even when they're fighting in absolute wastelands like Afghanistan. And if they're hesitant to nuke 'heathen muslims' in deserted mountains, then they're not going to nuke fellow Slavs in lands whose main value is to grow crops.

But if you insist on this view, then the only thing I can say is that I'll tag you again in two weeks and see if your alarmist assessment proves true.

Russia and allfather Putin final warning?

This post has been edited by max_cavalera: Jun 5 2025, 06:09 PM

Fact Check: Did Ukraine Give Up Nukes for Russia, U.S. Security Guarantees?
https://www.newsweek.com/fact-check-did-ukr...rantees-1765048

It really depends on if the US or UK will retaliate. Biden was clear, if Putin launched nukes it is nuclear Armageddon. The problem right now is Trump isn't exactly saying that. The UK and France are distancing themselves from this. Other than diplomatic rebukes and some token sanctions, what else are they likely to do?

The reason being Ukraine hit at Russia's nuclear strike capability first, providing a justification for a nuclear retaliation. Nobody knows if Putin will really push the button or not. It is unlikely, but it is not impossible right now.

Pros for Putin: quick end to the war, consolidate his grip on power
Cons for Putin: possible international backlash (less risky because of Ukraine's strike), no guarantee it will be effective, a deterrent is only effective if it is not used, limited possible targets

It remains to be seen if Operation Spiderweb did more harm to Ukraine than good.

Padan mukak russia..mesti badut putler lompat lompat marah marah LOL SIap suruh komander of the russian airfoce to lompat keluar tingkap lagi...

i am not sure how many times russian officials and state media threaten nukes on Ukraine and on London lol

even sinking of flagship to bombing of crimean bridge seems to have cross red lines.

i wonder when Ukraine gonna start targeting russia economy lifeline which is oil production again.

The indicator of whether something really hurt russia, is when they start threatening nukes.

At this point, there's not much value in targeting russian oil production because oil prices dropped low. Apparently with the price cap, russia is selling oil at 50 per barrel when costs are 44 per barrel. Much more useful to target russia's logistics network - which thanks to the recent truck-drone attacks, will be a lot more scrutinised and industry a lot slower.

2 Things.

1. NATO promised USSR president Gorbachev in 1990 not to expand eastwards. Now NATO expansion has reached Russia's doorstep, betraying the promise. So, nobody talks about promise anymore since it is NATO who broke the promise first. Trust is already broken.

2. Nukes in Ukraine at the time did not belong to them. The command codes are in Kremlin and belong to the Russians. Even if Ukraine kept the nukes at the time, they couldn't use it.
If US can justify the use of nukes in Japan during WW2, I don't see how Russia cannot justify the use of nukes in Ukraine since Ukraine strike their nuke delivery means first. Since Russia already gotten hit with so much sanctions, Putin has nothing to lose if he use nukes in Ukraine.

This post has been edited by k!nex: Jun 5 2025, 10:53 PM

Pudding won’t have the balls to launch nukes. Tag me again if he ever did.

Paper Tiger Russia can’t even crush Ukraine after 3 years of conventional warfare, it has zero chance to win against more than one country’s warfare. Resorting to nukes only means mutual destruction, same as suicide.

Makan lah cerita dongeng russia tuh sangat...

Trump is about to walk away from Ukraine methinks. Going to get even more interesting soon. Hottest summer.

yeah it's funny amdks have assembled in here like marvel avengers, saling jerking off to each other. all of them refused to acknowledge US is behind all these. leaked info already posted, all these old man amdks still want to circle jerk each other.

exactly like b40 umnogoons wearing red tshirt during bersih protest.