Bombing cities, railway lines, roads, is still roughly at the same level as they were previously. Hitting at their nuclear strike capability is something else.

It is the same for any other nuclear power. Touching their ability to launch their nukes is a big no no to them.

If you are going to do that, you better make sure you have the capability to wipe them out completely. Ukraine is far from being able to do that.

There are some options that Putin has not touched yet. Including nukes and other modern weapons.

Let's us focus on 'smaller' incidents: destroyed of airplanes and bridge kena bxmbed

Let's us ignore the bigger pic: Polar bears are advancing.

Depend which side and story u want to focus.   

AMDK keep repeating Polar bear failed to take Kyiv on the first 3 days. 

Now, one country 20% land gone 

Agent Krasnov: hue hue hue

Trump: Putin says Russia will ‘have to’ respond to Ukraine attacks
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/trump-...cks/ar-AA1G5YSH

Basically, Trump says ayam tatau ayam virgin, lu sukak buat apa, lu buatlah lol

edit: just in case nanti amdk say i fitnah orange emperor, not cinaman say one, is one of your angmoh masters say one
Trump Warns Putin Plans to Retaliate 'Very Strongly' Against Ukraine
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/trump-...ine/ar-AA1G67UO

The US and UK are basically washing their hands and staying away from the whole shit show. Frankly, I don't think we are going to see any US retaliation even if Putin decides to bomb the crap out of Kyiv. At most, strongly WORDED statements, saying what a bad boy you are Putin.

Hopefully no nukes. Read what you will from Trump's statement.

edit: Mentioned before this, Ukraine is not under Nato, or any other nuclear umbrella.

Traditionally, it has been the role of the US to talk these guys down from the brink. Well, the current president didn't even bother to read the rulebook.

Not a single nuclear superpower is interested in extending their nuclear umbrella over Ukraine. Even BFF France is keeping quiet.

So, all benefits with nothing much to lose. Tell me, if you were Putin, what would be the most logical next move? It would already be very good if he just bombs the shit out of Kyiv using conventional weapons.
Don't underestimate the man. It is not easy to remain in power for so long. A pussycat, Putin is not.

Not interested. I am not a betting man. Debate it coherently if you can.

Here, have a read of the US envoy's opinion about this, since you would disregard mine. Source is from the Kyiv post if that makes you happy.

‘Ukraine Can Play This Game Too’: Kellogg Warns Drone Strikes on Russian Nuclear Bombers Raise Risk Level
https://www.kyivpost.com/post/53920

edit: here is another article about why Russian shouldn't use nukes written in 2022. hth

Why Hasn’t Putin Gone Nuclear in Ukraine?
https://nationalinterest.org/feature/why-ha...-ukraine-205893

The problem with this view is that two of the most important reasons against the use of nukes isn't so strong today
1) The US is not promising retaliatory strikes, neither is NATO.
2) Ukraine hit the Russians nuclear strike capability first, so Putin has all the excuse needed.

You should probably look at if nukes are going to be effective and possible fallout for Putin.

i am not sure how many times russian officials and state media threaten nukes on Ukraine and on London lol

even sinking of flagship to bombing of crimean bridge seems to have cross red lines.

i wonder when Ukraine gonna start targeting russia economy lifeline which is oil production again.