From 9 April, motive also got…no action till today?

1:29 PM (9 April 2025) – Pamela used a Grab e-hailing service from Jalan Cheras to go to the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) headquarters in Putrajaya.

1:52 PM – Her phone was last detected near the MEX Highway, close to Putra Permai.

1:57 PM – Pamela messaged her lawyer on WhatsApp saying she was on the way and expected to arrive at MACC by 2:08 PM.

After 2:00 PM – Her family and lawyer tried to contact her, but she didn’t reply. WhatsApp messages were not delivered and calls went unanswered.

3:02 PM – Her lawyer filed a police report at the Presint 7 Police Station, Putrajaya.

10 April 2025 – A second police report was filed by the lawyer at Seri Kembangan Police Station.

2 May 2025 – Pamela’s family released a public statement asking for help from the public. They said the Grab car she was in was stopped by three unknown vehicles, and she was forced into one of them.

3 May 2025 – Kuala Lumpur Police Chief, Datuk Rusdi Mohd Isa, confirmed the case is being investigated under Section 365 of the Penal Code (kidnapping or wrongful confinement). Several people, including MACC officers and Pamela’s lawyer, have given statements.

4 May 2025 – Pamela is still missing. Search efforts continue.

Background:

Pamela, 42, is the wife of Sarawak businessman Datuk Seri Thomas Hah Tiing Siu. They are going through a complicated divorce in Malaysia and Singapore, involving valuable assets.

Her lawyer, Datuk N. Sivananthan, said both Pamela and her husband are under investigation by MACC for a money laundering case.

https://www.hmetro.com.my/mutakhir/2025/05/...eri-pamela-ling

Why mainstream media no ball to report this?

 

if she got reach MACC then she got benghock-ed

if she not yet reach MACC then she got koh-ed

if later found in tong simen then she got morais-ed

familiar tactics but PHcais will say reformasi!

https://www.nst.com.my/news/nation/2025/05/...s-disappearance

Azam: Stop blaming MACC for Pamela Ling's disappearance

KUALA LUMPUR: Tan Sri Azam Baki has slammed some parties for claiming that the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission had not accorded adequate protection to Datin Seri Pamela Ling before her disappearance.

The MACC chief commissioner said it was unfair to blame the commission over the case.

"I think the public needs to stop speculating on this case and allow the police space and time to investigate it thoroughly.

"You cannot blame us for her disappearance as the incident was beyond our control and occurred on a public road and not within the MACC compound," he told the New Straits Times.

Azam said there was no way to predict any threat to Ling's safety.

He said prior to her disappearance, Ling had been to the MACC headquarters several times to facilitate investigations into a money-laundering case.

"On these occasions, nothing untoward had occurred and there were no signs that she was threatened."

Azam said they would leave the investigation to the police.

"We will continue to cooperate fully. Our investigating officer who was tasked with taking her statement has also had a statement recorded by police."

On the money laundering investigation, Azam declined to elaborate, but said that they would be handling it themselves and would not require roping in other agencies at this juncture.