Cisco was one of the first high-tech companies to halt its business in Russia and Belarus after the former started its full-scale war against Ukraine on February 24, 2022.

During the company's exit, Cisco's Russian subsidiary physically destroyed unsold equipment worth 1.9 billion rubles ($23.5 million), reports CNews citing the state-run Tass agency. 

Network giant Cisco destroyed its equipment stocks worth almost 1.9 billion rubles ($23.5 million) in January 2023, months after announcing its decision to discontinue operations in Russia and Belarus in March 2022. The physically destroyed equipment included mainly spare parts for the company's devices that were not sold due to the current policy imposed by Cisco. Meanwhile, it is unclear whether those spare parts also fall under the U.S. sanctions against Russia.

Despite the financial impact, Cisco made the decision to destroy the equipment rather than allow it to fall into Russian hands. But while $23.5 million sounds like a lot of money, the actual impact seems to be considerably higher.

While the Russian news agency claims that the equipment was destroyed in January, Cisco's financial report for the quarter that ended January 28, 2023, does not mention this in any way. This is because the company essentially wrote off $67 million worth of assets, including spare parts already imported to Russia as well as furniture and cars, after conducting a risk assessment of its assets and potential financial exposures in Russia and Belarus as early as calendar Q1 2022.

Based on the assessment, Cisco reserved for the non-recoverability of most of its assets in these countries. Consequently, it recorded non-recurring charges of $67 million in its cost of sales and operating expenses in the third quarter of fiscal 2022. These charges were related to the non-recoverability of certain assets and special personnel-related expenses aimed at supporting affected employees.

It should be noted that for Cisco, which reported revenue of $13.592 billion and net income of $2.773 billion in the second quarter of fiscal 2023, $23.5 million worth of equipment and $67 million in various assets are relatively negligible sums of money.

Chinese telecom companies are starting to remove American devices from their networks and turn them off completely, in a move to protect national security and confront potential risks.

Back in 2022 when Russia terms with USA soured due to escalating Ukrainian war, Cisco turned on the kill switch and disabled all its telco equipments in Russia before making the exit.

Cisco's Russian subsidiary physically destroyed unsold equipment worth 1.9 billion rubles ($23.5 million).

So the question here is China the only threat with backdoors and kill switches in their telecom equipments?

Western companies are saints?

If U have beef with US kenot just say Americunt? Why drag the whole west with US fucking A?

While DNB in Malaysia chose to go with Ericsson and believe the Westerner fears that China is the only threat to their national internet infra?

Haha china.

Go play on your own. Until you learn how to behave and follow rules

All NATO countries and those who lost in WW2 are their loyalists.

While DNB in Malaysia chose to go with Ericsson and believe the Westerner fears that China is the only threat to their national internet infra?

While DNB in Malaysia chose to go with Ericsson and believe the Westerner fears that China is the only threat to their national internet infra?

Western countries are not making a claim on the South China Sea.

That is the main reason why China will NEVER stand on US, Israel and Bharat camp. They are 2 opposing forces now shaping up WW3.

You can dream about China embracing Christianity or any other Abrahamic faiths such as Islam or Judaism.

How the government plans to use DNB and Huawei
The government plans to allow a second 5G network in Malaysia, which could include Huawei, to break DNB's monopoly.
The government wants to balance Eastern and Western technology by allowing Huawei to participate in the second 5G network.

Western countries are not making a claim on the South China Sea.