tbh Forester 2.0 AWD not that fuel consuming in my opinion, it does better than X50, but X50 have a lot of torque higher than even some NA 2.4L engine.
PRo and con of AWD car
PRo and con of AWD car
|
|
Aug 22 2024, 11:54 AM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,555 posts Joined: May 2010 From: In your liver |
tbh Forester 2.0 AWD not that fuel consuming in my opinion, it does better than X50, but X50 have a lot of torque higher than even some NA 2.4L engine.
|
| Change to: | 0.0194sec
1.21
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 23rd December 2025 - 11:31 PM |