QUOTE(allomicro @ Feb 13 2024, 03:15 PM)
What the ice cream seller did may not be right, but the reaction does not seem to be apt; "punishment doesn't fit the crime".
Actually the one that really maxed out the situation would be MIC. The girl said the guy don't want to sell to indians. She never said boycott the ice cream seller because he discriminate indians. She even posted a follow up video saying the guy said sorry and don't viral the guy. MIC yang sibuk mintak dia buat apology video. Also, she did not hide the truth saying the guy saja tak nak jual; she mention and posted the police report in her video. The original article just conveniently left it out.
Again, the guy is not the main issue, its the attitude to blanket ban a society based on a few that is the issues. Also the media telling half truth to get clicks and rile people up.
Invitation to treat is not an offer. Its not a legally binding offer. Actually the one that really maxed out the situation would be MIC. The girl said the guy don't want to sell to indians. She never said boycott the ice cream seller because he discriminate indians. She even posted a follow up video saying the guy said sorry and don't viral the guy. MIC yang sibuk mintak dia buat apology video. Also, she did not hide the truth saying the guy saja tak nak jual; she mention and posted the police report in her video. The original article just conveniently left it out.
Again, the guy is not the main issue, its the attitude to blanket ban a society based on a few that is the issues. Also the media telling half truth to get clicks and rile people up.
I think this topic joe star also know almost every month will have a thread to recycle the arguments be it room or ice cream or ...
Feb 13 2024, 05:40 PM

Quote
0.3618sec
0.33
6 queries
GZIP Disabled