This is stupid ... they should do as much as possible to get people to install solar on their homes, that will spread out the generating capacity and will reuse space (roofs) instead of clearing large swaths of land that can be used for something else - especially if it results in deforestation.

Also if you're providing incentives for people to install solar in their homes you dont have much if any capital outlay either.

This is why you see in other advanced countries they dont generally build big solar plants but get their residents to put up solar on their roofs. Its a win win win situation.

But here ... build big big power plants so that certain parties can benefit with crony deals, its the case with coal plants, damns, and now solar plants.

Last time the argument probably correct when compared to the cost of solar.

the price of solar have come down 80-85% the last 10 years...

will that argument still make sense now?

even much colder climate EU country like Germany is going big on solar now

solar cost is not only on the panel,.. the cost also on the size of land,..

use hydrowater ~
+ battery.

Hello….malaysians pandai kira one okay? Where got so easy to use their house?

Hello? You read my post or simply comment?

No one is talking about letting others use your house.

Its about getting people to install solar on their own, like you see its common to do in Australia, Netherlands, Germany etc.

solar cost is not only on the panel,.. the cost also on the size of land,..

Y need to use land ? Put on water even more efficient, it provides cooling for the solar panels as well.

Yeap. Brilliant.

No need spend money to keep cutting undergrown bushes/grass for maintenance as well.

Y need to use land ? Put on water even more efficient, it provides cooling for the solar panels as well.

This is stupid ... they should do as much as possible to get people to install solar on their homes, that will spread out the generating capacity and will reuse space (roofs) instead of clearing large swaths of land that can be used for something else - especially if it results in deforestation.

Also if you're providing incentives for people to install solar in their homes you dont have much if any capital outlay either.

This is why you see in other advanced countries they dont generally build big solar plants but get their residents to put up solar on their roofs. Its a win win win situation.

But here ... build big big power plants so that certain parties can benefit with crony deals, its the case with coal plants, damns, and now solar plants.

There's already a program from SEDA called NEM 3.0 but it's not lucrative. ROI too long for consumer

ROI is 4.5 to 5 years is too long?

Sabah or Sarawak got abundance green energy lay waste due to no place to store it . How much energy is it , if connect to west Mal yr tnb bill can go down 10 cent but due to plotikus thing no one want to do this .

No it is 10 years!

I am a user, are you one too?

Sabah or Sarawak got abundance green energy lay waste due to no place to store it . How much energy is it , if connect to west Mal yr tnb bill can go down 10 cent but due to plotikus thing no one want to do this .

No I inquired about this before. Many advise me since my bill is between 200 - 300 a month, not worth to install solar...better to do energy savings...which I did