For those who got the Skyworth GN630V combo router, it's super easy to turn that thing into bridge mode and still use PPPOE at your own router.

You should definitely do that as any decent third party router should have a much faster CPU than the GN630V.

My settings below:


Note: VLAN tagging / IPTV Profile / VLAN profile not needed on your router with this configuration!

Remember to switch off the WiFi function once that's done.

I have checked these Skyworth 2.5G ONR, someone hire me to fix it

first, Skyworth 2.5G ONR using MediaTek, still use ancient binary blobs, example: ancient `boa` just like D-Link
second, Skyworth 2.5G ONR can't Bridge if OLT says NO, their firmware fully respect OLT, unlike D-Link
third, many late Unifi deployment, high chance FHTT OLT is there, thus 2G performance is vary:
PLOAM start with 001xxxxxxx (new customer = issue)
PLOAM start with 0001xxxxxx (old customer = no problem)

then...

1. I disable TR069 and VLAN209 on ONR
2. Call 100, report internet problem
3. Customer Support proceed to reboot ONR
4. ONR rebooted
5. ???

With ISP management like TR069 disabled, TM still have full control of ONR

For me, I against ONR, I would much prefer ONT + Router, so far only Maxis and Allo provide ONT + Router.

I think your one might be the 2nd revision one with the 2.5Gbps port?

After complete name change to portal and bill 1+year after FSU, TMshit force me get private ip



Now, their ipv6 settings also bricked



Useless TMshit 

hello there, I've been experiencing constant ping spikes while gaming. I initially thought it was an issue with Maxis, having been with them for two years. However, I recently switched to Unifi, and the problem persists. When I used TMnet's EasyFix tool, it indicated a hardware issue.

I contacted TM, and they reset my port last night, but I haven had the chance to test if it resolved the ping spikes. Even after the reset, the TM EasyFix tool still detects this supposed hardware issue.

I'm using Wi-Fi, and I've tried two setups:

TM's own  combo router AX3000 in combo mode
TM combo router AX3000 bridge mode pair with TPlink AX5400

Despite these changes, the ping spikes continue. I've tested both the 2.4GHz and 5GHz bands, but no difference.

Does anyone have any opinions on this?

You still having the pppoe disconnect problem? Way back in 2019, I had this prob too. iirc, it was like this for the whole week but I was busy so didn't bother about it. Then the problem went away the next week.


Sometimes minutes and sometimes hours between the disconnections. iirc I get a PADT for all(?) the disconnections.

https://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopi...post&p=96183145

Just for knowledge, may I know

What was the issue leading to your previous frequent dc and what TM tech actually did to fix the issue? TQ!

Edit: Seems like they stopped giving PLOAM password

Not visible in plain text on every ONU / ONR model

The new firmware sort of changed the interface (or because i am login using tmadmin and not actual admin)? No longer have the option to just choose bridge mode, instead now need to be selected under WAN mode (top level).



After set to bridge mode, which port should i connect to? The 2.5 or the 1st WAN/LAN 1? I tried both, not working.

Also, anyone can advise if the fiber plugged in and its fine, is the PON light suppose to keep blinking or permanent?

300Mbps speed is it private ip?

What are the advantage of private ip ?

For regular users, the benefits of having your Internet connection run through CGNAT (using private IP addresses) are mainly about efficiency and cost:

Better Use of Limited IPs: Your ISP can share a single public IP address among many customers. This smart use of addresses means they can keep providing service even when public IPs are in short supply.

Cost Savings: Because fewer public IP addresses need to be managed or purchased, your ISP can offer reliable internet at lower costs, which often means more affordable service for you.

Added Basic Security: Your personal device's private IP isn’t directly exposed to the public internet. This extra “shield” can help reduce the risk of unsolicited attacks on your home network.

Overall, while CGNAT might sometimes affect things like hosting your own server or port forwarding, for most home users it makes your connection reliable, cost-effective, and a bit more secure.

Using a public IP address instead of a private IP (CGNAT) has several advantages, especially for users who need more control over their internet connection. Here’s how public IPs compare:

Advantages of Public IP Over Private IP (CGNAT)

Direct Access to Your Devices
With a public IP, your devices can be accessed directly from the internet, making it easier to host services like websites, game servers, remote desktop connections, or CCTV cameras without extra workarounds.
With CGNAT, inbound connections are blocked unless the ISP provides a way to forward ports.

No Issues with Port Forwarding
Public IPs allow full control over port forwarding, letting you set up services like VPNs, home servers, or custom applications.
CGNAT usually blocks this functionality because multiple users share the same public IP.
Better Online Gaming Experience

Some online multiplayer games require NAT Type 1 or 2 for optimal connections. CGNAT often forces a strict NAT Type 3, which can cause connection issues, longer matchmaking times, or even prevent online play.
With a public IP, gaming consoles and PCs can connect directly to other players, improving performance.
Improved Peer-to-Peer (P2P) Performance

Services like torrenting, file sharing, and decentralized applications work better with a public IP because they rely on direct peer connections.
Under CGNAT, these services might experience slow speeds or connection failures.

Avoid Shared IP Restrictions
Many websites and services block or impose limits on users from CGNAT networks because multiple people share the same IP.
If someone on the same CGNAT IP is banned from a website or flagged for suspicious activity, you might also get blocked.

Easier Remote Access & IoT Device Management
Public IPs allow direct control of smart home devices (e.g., security cameras, smart thermostats, and automation systems) from anywhere without relying on third-party cloud services.
CGNAT makes this more complicated and sometimes impossible.

When is CGNAT Acceptable?
If you only browse the web, watch videos, or use social media, CGNAT won’t make a noticeable difference.
If your ISP offers IPv6, many of these limitations disappear since IPv6 allows every device to have a unique address.

Final Thoughts
If you need remote access, better gaming, P2P performance, or hosting services, a public IP is the better option. If your ISP only provides CGNAT, you might have to request a static or dynamic public IP as an add-on service.

Anyone here with a GN630V able to help confirm something?



Do any of you have as much errors as shown in the screenshot above?

Swapped out to my other ONU unit, changed LAN cables, went from SFP+ to RJ45 to just pure RJ45

Starting to suspect might be fiber issue and not my equipment, gonna lodge a report if this is not normal behavior

TIA

happen to me after 12 hours no internet, technician came reset everything then all works smooth. They told there some hidden admin you need change combo to modem . He didnt want give me the password