Lol got roles like tank some more
This is hilarious
Malaysian won $433K in SG casino via Excel formula
Malaysian won $433K in SG casino via Excel formula
|
|
Nov 23 2023, 12:02 AM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#121
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,162 posts Joined: Sep 2004 |
Lol got roles like tank some more
This is hilarious |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 23 2023, 08:24 AM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#122
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
237 posts Joined: Jan 2016 |
QUOTE(loserguy @ Nov 22 2023, 10:43 PM) if you send info to another party, then he use feng shui to gain advantage and pass it back to you? probably I would say certainly not. Feng Shui is not scientific proven and thus cannot be used in court as evidence.if you keep everything in your head and choose the most ong seat at the table, probably not. Look at Genting, they also use feng shui to gain advantage. |
|
|
Nov 23 2023, 08:26 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
420 posts Joined: Feb 2022 |
|
|
|
Nov 23 2023, 08:29 AM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#124
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
237 posts Joined: Jan 2016 |
QUOTE(differ @ Nov 22 2023, 09:44 PM) Not according to the law in Singapore. Any device used to counter record the cards is already an offence. Say if A is in the casino, he send info to B at home. B do nothing with the info and toss a dice, then B send info back to A to tell him buy what/etc. A by luck win a lot, is A and B break the law? Certainly not right. So if B now instead use a device/laptop and enter the info into a spreadsheet which does not have any clear objective as reported in the article, why A and B now break the law? The prosecutor need to prove that the spreadsheet indeed has clear objective which is to give A advantage by doing some calculation. |
|
|
Nov 23 2023, 08:30 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
105 posts Joined: May 2009 From: palaoxko |
>player 6 banker 7
charsiew topkek Nearlee |
|
|
Nov 23 2023, 08:52 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
139 posts Joined: Feb 2019 |
QUOTE(monkeyking918 @ Nov 23 2023, 09:29 AM) Say if A is in the casino, he send info to B at home. The problem is they used own devices to record the cards and sent the info to others !B do nothing with the info and toss a dice, then B send info back to A to tell him buy what/etc. A by luck win a lot, is A and B break the law? Certainly not right. So if B now instead use a device/laptop and enter the info into a spreadsheet which does not have any clear objective as reported in the article, why A and B now break the law? The prosecutor need to prove that the spreadsheet indeed has clear objective which is to give A advantage by doing some calculation. There are very CLEAR rules stated that player can't use player's own devices to play the game ! 172A.—(1) A person must not, in relation to the playing of any game in a casino, obtain or attempt to obtain any money or advantage for himself or herself or any other person — (a) by a fraudulent trick, device, sleight of hand or representation; (b) by a fraudulent scheme or practice; © by the fraudulent use of gaming equipment or any other thing; or (d) by placing a bet in a game after the result of the game is known. This post has been edited by James8899: Nov 23 2023, 08:54 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 23 2023, 08:56 AM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#127
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
762 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
By not gambling you already won. Don't fall into temptation of winning by the slim chance. The moment you gamble, you already lost. CoffeeDude liked this post
|
|
|
Nov 23 2023, 08:57 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,609 posts Joined: Sep 2005 From: KL |
If scientists can build a robot that looks like human, can send the robot to different casinos and win non stop.
Every week win 100k also enough lor. |
|
|
Nov 23 2023, 10:02 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,838 posts Joined: Dec 2007 |
If this method was used in the 1990s in whatever casino which Excel... I think no casino will able to detect it.
|
|
|
Nov 23 2023, 10:05 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
40 posts Joined: May 2020 |
cheater justice...
|
|
|
Nov 23 2023, 10:12 AM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#131
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
220 posts Joined: Jan 2019 From: Earth |
I thought they operated by calculated risk formula? They didn't cheated right? No machine or force injection of logics to the casino machines or anything? It's just a calculated risk business where the odds of getting the money is higher? Isn't that what insurance company are operating on?
This post has been edited by Capt. Marble: Nov 23 2023, 10:17 AM |
|
|
Nov 23 2023, 12:38 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#132
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
500 posts Joined: Dec 2019 |
QUOTE(monkeyking918 @ Nov 23 2023, 08:24 AM) I would say certainly not. Feng Shui is not scientific proven and thus cannot be used in court as evidence. the act of passing info back and forth is the illegal thing I think. feng shui, even card counting, is not illegal.Look at Genting, they also use feng shui to gain advantage. |
|
|
Nov 23 2023, 02:14 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#133
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
404 posts Joined: Dec 2008 |
QUOTE(monkeyking918 @ Nov 23 2023, 08:29 AM) Say if A is in the casino, he send info to B at home. Nope, it's illegal. End of story. B do nothing with the info and toss a dice, then B send info back to A to tell him buy what/etc. A by luck win a lot, is A and B break the law? Certainly not right. So if B now instead use a device/laptop and enter the info into a spreadsheet which does not have any clear objective as reported in the article, why A and B now break the law? The prosecutor need to prove that the spreadsheet indeed has clear objective which is to give A advantage by doing some calculation. You walk around with a gun in SG, nobody needs to prove that you intend to cause harm. |
| Change to: | 0.0224sec
0.23
5 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 6th December 2025 - 04:41 AM |