Buying a Toyota nowadays is literally buying a Perodua except for the price. Those who say torsion beam is as good has never sat on a good double wishbone or multi link car.
Buying a Toyota nowadays is literally buying a Perodua except for the price. Those who say torsion beam is as good has never sat on a good double wishbone or multi link car.
no wonder my mom prefer to ride on my preve than her honda city...
Please la 2023 stop talking about handling or 3 cylinder and all that. Everyone still retarded cannot drive at all. Give ya all multilink or 4 cylinder for what? Ya all still gonna cause accidents. Cannot even pass the 5 star safety BY YOURSELVES since death trap Myvi first existed and wanna talk about better power and better handling. Malu la wei.
Please la 2023 stop talking about handling or 3 cylinder and all that. Everyone still retarded cannot drive at all. Give ya all multilink or 4 cylinder for what? Ya all still gonna cause accidents. Cannot even pass the 5 star safety BY YOURSELVES since death trap Myvi first existed and wanna talk about better power and better handling. Malu la wei.
if you buy car, sure will see 1. engine 2. gearbox 3. platform
Some of you damn funny la. Macam la you can sense the miniscule difference between torsion beam and multi-link. I doubt you can feel the 'underwhelmed' performance of torsion beam in your typical drive, unless you whack corner every single time. It's not about the suspension alone, chassis play an important role in the ride quality department too.
My wife just replaced hers with Cross. Fuck, the ride was surprisingly composed in high speed and cornering. I dare say as good as my old Accord already. Heck, its relatively more pleasant and comfortable (ok la SUV/crossover ma).
Yes torsion beam are found in cheap cars but if sufficient engineering involved, torsion beam can also be tuned as close as multi-link behavior. Large sedan cars can accommodate multi-link cos it takes lots of space so there's a slight compromise between interior space and ride quality for compact/sub-compact segments.
Some of you damn funny la. Macam la you can sense the miniscule difference between torsion beam and multi-link. I doubt you can feel the 'underwhelmed' performance of torsion beam in your typical drive, unless you whack corner every single time. It's not about the suspension alone, chassis play an important role in the ride quality department too.
My wife just replaced hers with Cross. Fuck, the ride was surprisingly composed in high speed and cornering. I dare say as good as my old Accord already. Heck, its relatively more pleasant and comfortable (ok la SUV/crossover ma).
Yes torsion beam are found in cheap cars but if sufficient engineering involved, torsion beam can also be tuned as close as multi-link behavior. Large sedan cars can accommodate multi-link cos it takes lots of space so there's a slight compromise between interior space and ride quality for compact/sub-compact segments.
If torsion beam is so good then why didnt toyota use it in their Camry and new Alphard?
Some of you damn funny la. Macam la you can sense the miniscule difference between torsion beam and multi-link. I doubt you can feel the 'underwhelmed' performance of torsion beam in your typical drive, unless you whack corner every single time. It's not about the suspension alone, chassis play an important role in the ride quality department too.
My wife just replaced hers with Cross. Fuck, the ride was surprisingly composed in high speed and cornering. I dare say as good as my old Accord already. Heck, its relatively more pleasant and comfortable (ok la SUV/crossover ma).
Yes torsion beam are found in cheap cars but if sufficient engineering involved, torsion beam can also be tuned as close as multi-link behavior. Large sedan cars can accommodate multi-link cos it takes lots of space so there's a slight compromise between interior space and ride quality for compact/sub-compact segments.
can you accept lower level chip in your new mobile phone?
the downside of torsion beam, when left and right is on uneven surface, you will bounce a lot.
multi link is still much more superior in my accord.
That actually has to do with suspension stiffness, damping factor and arb.... Not type of suspension. Be it torsion beam, double wishbone or multi-link, all are highly susceptible to bouncing on uneven surface.
If torsion beam is so good then why didnt toyota use it in their Camry and new Alphard?
knn, i didn't said torsion beam is good standalone. Chassis is also important. You go ask Toyota la. But my estima aeras has been using torsion beam setup too. Not trying to say its good - in fact its not - ride is comfortable but floating feel. So again chassis + suspension if setup with proper engineering, everyday drive would be sufficient too.
knn, i didn't said torsion beam is good standalone. Chassis is also important. You go ask Toyota la. But my estima aeras has been using torsion beam setup too. Not trying to say its good - in fact its not - ride is comfortable but floating feel. So again chassis + suspension if setup with proper engineering, everyday drive would be sufficient too.
But the floating feel it's not because it's torsion beam... It's because the suspension is not firm enough.
The mark of a good suspension is where you don't "feel" the suspension
It's just is.
If can feel good means still subpar
Mostly doesn't exist.... Suspensions are tuned for certain speed and weight range... Only active suspensions can have precise control. Most suspensions are passive.
for those who refused to believe that there's a difference between the 2.
basically, torsion beam is a form of compromise which means if the manufacturer gives you torsion beam then they better well give you something else in return.
for those who refused to believe that there's a difference between the 2.
basically, torsion beam is a form of compromise which means if the manufacturer gives you torsion beam then they better well give you something else in return.
To average consumers, will they know the difference?
for those who refused to believe that there's a difference between the 2.
basically, torsion beam is a form of compromise which means if the manufacturer gives you torsion beam then they better well give you something else in return.
no doubt multi link is better than torsion beam, but at low corner speed, i doubt anyone would felt the different, more so if it's a passager car
chassis and suspension set up will contribute more "solid" feeling
Tagging Jedi to come defend maruah Mazda for using torsion beam in Mazda3
lol, what for bro...we are not talking to a bunch of petrolheads, to them torsion beam renault megane, mazda torsion beams are the basic shit torsion beams anyway.
Some of you damn funny la. Macam la you can sense the miniscule difference between torsion beam and multi-link. I doubt you can feel the 'underwhelmed' performance of torsion beam in your typical drive, unless you whack corner every single time. It's not about the suspension alone, chassis play an important role in the ride quality department too.
My wife just replaced hers with Cross. Fuck, the ride was surprisingly composed in high speed and cornering. I dare say as good as my old Accord already. Heck, its relatively more pleasant and comfortable (ok la SUV/crossover ma).
Yes torsion beam are found in cheap cars but if sufficient engineering involved, torsion beam can also be tuned as close as multi-link behavior. Large sedan cars can accommodate multi-link cos it takes lots of space so there's a slight compromise between interior space and ride quality for compact/sub-compact segments.
It's all about suspension design and refinement of the design.
Even whack corner also hard to feel. People here in lowyat are not pro racers. And then stock suspension are designed to let you tear up the track. Alot more work is needed. Suspension is just one of the many factors.
Most people don't even know that Chevrolet Cruze actually won wtcc which is FF and torsion beam... Beat Hondas, beat bmw, beat merc etc... One key component is possibly use of watts-link for it's torsion beam.
Another thing is that even in sepang race, there are vios and altis which performed very well... It's the driver, not the car.
This post has been edited by bengm2019: Apr 27 2023, 07:37 AM
Looked at those YouTubers in langkawi Vios test drive, all blow until this new vios rides like the bmw 3 series in terms of traction, cornering etc
The previous Vios, one local YouTubers old guys said it drive very well to Genting. Fed up with local car reviewer. All just play safe by giving fake review.
If torsion beam is so good then why didnt toyota use it in their Camry and new Alphard?
Because the SEA customer always get a rip off car features and had to ask car reviewer to give fake review to said torsion beam is the best. If it Honda, prepare for cut cost, cheapskate sound insulation materials
To average consumers, will they know the difference?
the difference is actually rather obvious so I would argue yes unless of course such person has never driven a car with rear suspension other than torsion beam then no.
QUOTE(billy3336 @ Apr 26 2023, 04:54 PM)
no doubt multi link is better than torsion beam, but at low corner speed, i doubt anyone would felt the different, more so if it's a passager car chassis and suspension set up will contribute more "solid" feeling
the problem with many people is that they think suspension only takes effect during a "corner", that is a misconception. the effect of a different suspension set up can easily be felt driving through an uneven road (even if it's a long-straight).
in fact, you can even feel it through a speed bump, after the rear tire has passed it.
the difference is actually rather obvious so I would argue yes unless of course such person has never driven a car with rear suspension other than torsion beam then no. the problem with many people is that they think suspension only takes effect during a "corner", that is a misconception. the effect of a different suspension set up can easily be felt driving through an uneven road (even if it's a long-straight).
in fact, you can even feel it through a speed bump, after the rear tire has passed it.
from the article that u posted urself, multi vs torsion beam
tuning more important, not necessarily having multi link will be more comfort in road bum than torsion beam
This post has been edited by billy3336: Apr 27 2023, 10:02 AM
Toyota always looking for cost reduction... kaizen... soon altis also come with no spare tyres... for better Quality and improve the car speed... that is what they will tell you...haha
Toyota always looking for cost reduction... kaizen... soon altis also come with no spare tyres... for better Quality and improve the car speed... that is what they will tell you...haha
Sales man will say
You want all feature go buy Lexus laaa Opps you no money to buy that car right
The previous Vios, one local YouTubers old guys said it drive very well to Genting. Fed up with local car reviewer. All just play safe by giving fake review.
after all the hype from reviewers about on Vios, I go test drive last week. CB the whole car float like sampan and the engine gutless. struggle to overtake on highway ramp. Maderfaker YS khong dont know get paid how much to praise this shit.
from the article that u posted urself, multi vs torsion beam
tuning more important, not necessarily having multi link will be more comfort in road bum than torsion beam
... but how many car manufacturers (meant for the mass market) are willing to spent the time/money to fine tune a torsion beam as slapping on a basic multi-link/double wishbone suspension would be much more cost-effective.
the article reports (loosely) that multi-link doesn't mean it is "superior" and that based on some of their testing, some multi-link/double wishbone didn't "live up to expectation".
No one should take that to mean even an "un-tuned" multi-link/double wishbone suspension cannot outplay the torsion beam in terms of comfort/handling.
it will take a lot of effort (tuning) for a torsion beam to have a chance of rivalling near a vanilla multi-link/double wishbone and everyone have to accept the fact that there is no way a torsion beam (no matter how much money/time spent) can behave like a multi-link/double wishbone suspension.
If they can engineered in a way which comfort and performance rivals those multi link setup then good, else just pure cost cutting measure.
comfort confirm can get, handling cannot fight multilink, except the chassis itself helps provide the good base handling. But altis malaysian models isn't for speed so comfort is more important. want performance get camry
... but how many car manufacturers (meant for the mass market) are willing to spent the time/money to fine tune a torsion beam as slapping on a basic multi-link/double wishbone suspension would be much more cost-effective.
the article reports (loosely) that multi-link doesn't mean it is "superior" and that based on some of their testing, some multi-link/double wishbone didn't "live up to expectation".
No one should take that to mean even an "un-tuned" multi-link/double wishbone suspension cannot outplay the torsion beam in terms of comfort/handling.
it will take a lot of effort (tuning) for a torsion beam to have a chance of rivalling near a vanilla multi-link/double wishbone and everyone have to accept the fact that there is no way a torsion beam (no matter how much money/time spent) can behave like a multi-link/double wishbone suspension.
yeah, of course, multi link are better no doubt, I'm not stupid enough to argue with that
but back to the point, will consumer notice that though? some multi link suspension are also not good , some torsion beam tuning also are comfortable
given toyota history for suspension, multi link or torsion beam,both will be soft, not like one will notice, big difference here should be the more solid tnga chassis
Cross and CX30 use torsion beam CRV and X70 use multilink
Is the CRV and X70 more superior? I doubt so
You might as well just give wira and persona elegance as an example. Both also use multilink rear suspension and they are not superior to the Cross or cx30.
yeah, of course, multi link are better no doubt, I'm not stupid enough to argue with that
but back to the point, will consumer notice that though? some multi link suspension are also not good , some torsion beam tuning also are comfortable
given toyota history for suspension, multi link or torsion beam,both will be soft, not like one will notice, big difference here should be the more solid tnga chassis
I would argue, yes. consumers will notice the difference unless such individual has never been in a car other than the ones equipped with torsion beam. the difference is actually quite obvious.
I've owned the 9th-gen Accord (Multi-link) and that car rides like butter and then I now drive the Mazda3 BP (torsion beam) and it is stiff which then prompted me to purchased the current Altis (double wishbone) and while this is a lot more pliant than the Mazda3, it is nowhere near the Accord.
I've also test driven the new VIOS (torsion beam) and while the differences are minutus (relative to the Altis) but certainly distinguishable especially when the vibrations are repeatedly reproduced (ie: a long uneven stretch of road). very obvious as well when passing a speed bump, difficult to translate the feel into words but it lacks that a dditional "bounce".
Front multi link and rear use torsion beam is more then enuf already . If rear pun use multi link then maintenance wear and tear high cost , sometime veli hard to digno weird noise , dunno which part rosak need test 1 by 1 .
after all the hype from reviewers about on Vios, I go test drive last week. CB the whole car float like sampan and the engine gutless. struggle to overtake on highway ramp. Maderfaker YS khong dont know get paid how much to praise this shit.
i had rent the previous gen Vios (as per youtuber review) cz office rent that for me. from Damansara - Kemaman so using Karak highway. it just a Sampan car, with annoying sound decibels from the engine (Toyota engine sound not great), plus the CVT gb. But more towards the Sampan suspension, this car only good at city drive A to B, long-distance just mehh
If your alignment guy tell you your rear wheel alignment is out of whack while your car rear suspension is twist beam... That basically means the entire rear twist beam has to be replaced, as there is no arm to be replace and or adjusted.
Cross and CX30 use torsion beam CRV and X70 use multilink
Is the CRV and X70 more superior? I doubt so
I think CRV (with multi-link) is still the best SUV for comfortable ride in the local market.
Just accept the fact that Torsion Beam is a cheap setup. If your car is Torsion Beam, it is not because the manufacturer have tuned it nicely for you, it is because they want more profits and you get a lesser car, simple as that. No need to ask so-called 'racers' or 'experts' to comment because they are not the ones paying for your car.
I think CRV (with multi-link) is still the best SUV for comfortable ride in the local market.
Just accept the fact that Torsion Beam is a cheap setup. If your car is Torsion Beam, it is not because the manufacturer have tuned it nicely for you, it is because they want more profits and you get a lesser car, simple as that. No need to ask so-called 'racers' or 'experts' to comment because they are not the ones paying for your car.
QUOTE(Jasonist @ Apr 27 2023, 12:37 PM)
Current CRV very bumpy la, not comfortable to sit at all
Two extremes
In any case, I think chassis > rear suspension and I'm still pretty happy with my torsion beam setup (it may be better with multilink but to me, it's good and comfortable enough)
Chassis in that period of time are soft, even evo3 chassis is very soft compare to modern cars.
stock wira suspension is very soft as well, so its comfortable.
yaya... no doubt that wira is comfort but not for you to go send taufu..... evo3 should be our wira? i do have doubts if their stiffness are the same though...
anyway to change from one suspension setup to another, compensation on chassis is a must.
an example is if you compare toyota corolla last gen with 4 speed to vios last gen with 4 speed to city last gen with 5 speed... (not the after gen due to that's the last with 4 disc brake)
then you will catch the point that chassis design is fairly important.
yaya... no doubt that wira is comfort but not for you to go send taufu..... evo3 should be our wira? i do have doubts if their stiffness are the same though...
anyway to change from one suspension setup to another, compensation on chassis is a must.
an example is if you compare toyota corolla last gen with 4 speed to vios last gen with 4 speed to city last gen with 5 speed... (not the after gen due to that's the last with 4 disc brake)
then you will catch the point that chassis design is fairly important.
That vios is a happy tail
I had the manual 1.5 wira last time.... change many cars over the time... now got 2 6spd manual.
evo 3 is based on Lancer 1991–1995 or wira chassis, but stiffen due to extra weld points and extra brace, ARB and etc. Plus Wira dont have ARB
compare evo3 chassis to modern day Lancer chasis (Inspira non Evo version) the stock evo3 is not as stiff as stock Inspira plus over the year wear and tear. this is due to advancement in steel/material improvement and strengthening of chassis.
I couldnt find the mitsu comparison, but you can see BMW 3 series, how much the chassis stiffness improve over time.
BMW E46 Sedan 18,000 BMW E90 3-Series 22,500 BMW F30 3-Series 29,300
Manufacturer tune the suspension to match the chassis, not the other way around.
Also some manufacturer tune the car to suit the requirements of the countries
If your alignment guy tell you your rear wheel alignment is out of whack while your car rear suspension is twist beam... That basically means the entire rear twist beam has to be replaced, as there is no arm to be replace and or adjusted.
Replace mean , we need to replace worn rubber bush at left and right trailing arm
If multi- link or wishbone then u got many bush need to change
1. maintain contact with road 2. absorb harsh bumps for comfort 3. transmit road feels to driver/chassis
i guess multilink/torsion beam differences differ in extreme ends as they approach the limits of their physics. For example, a torsion beam may not have very high individual wheel movement capability, so if the car hits a bump at an oblique angle , during a turn, it may not be able to plant both wheels firmly for contact, and that gives the driver a less confident feel as the rear slightly destabilize for a while.
I now drive the Mazda3 BP (torsion beam) and it is stiff which then prompted me to purchased the current Altis (double wishbone) and while this is a lot more pliant than the Mazda3, it is nowhere near the Accord.
Wait, you're replacing your Mazda 3 with Altis? But why though?!
Tnga dnga? Sounds bombastic In reality handling yaris worse than iriz Altis worse than even persona
QUOTE(Quazacolt @ Apr 27 2023, 09:06 PM)
Wait, you're replacing your Mazda 3 with Altis? But why though?!
Nope, I did not replace the Mazda3. Added the Altis into my garage and this is how I managed to distinguished the difference between a very well tuned torsion beam set up with a double wishbone because I hopped between the 2.
The Mazda3 is still my daily driver and I still very much love it.
Nope, I did not replace the Mazda3. Added the Altis into my garage and this is how I managed to distinguished the difference between a very well tuned torsion beam set up with a double wishbone because I hopped between the 2.
The Mazda3 is still my daily driver and I still very much love it.
Nope, I did not replace the Mazda3. Added the Altis into my garage and this is how I managed to distinguished the difference between a very well tuned torsion beam set up with a double wishbone because I hopped between the 2.
The Mazda3 is still my daily driver and I still very much love it.
Ah so Altis family car?
Btw another thing i hate about Toyota marketing: technically it isn't even double wishbone. Only single sided wishbone lol.
But nonetheless, it IS a multi link setup, on a modular globalised (TNGA, again, main purpose is consolidation and cost saving) platform.
And yes, id regard your feedback especially in regards to the topic at hand, between this 2 c segment sedan, and between this 2 rear suspension setup much higher than the other posters here who can only imagine/talk out of their "other hole that isn't meant to talk".
Btw another thing i hate about Toyota marketing: technically it isn't even double wishbone. Only single sided wishbone lol.
But nonetheless, it IS a multi link setup, on a modular globalised (TNGA, again, main purpose is consolidation and cost saving) platform.
And yes, id regard your feedback especially in regards to the topic at hand, between this 2 c segment sedan, and between this 2 rear suspension setup much higher than the other posters here who can only imagine/talk out of their "other hole that isn't meant to talk".
Yeap, the Altis as the family car. Initially wanted to buy into the whole cross-over/SUV hype but ended up with another sedan because the waiting list for the latter is just far too long.
Plus, never quite like the turbo-engine idea so the Altis' 1.8NA engine is good enough. To my surprise, it's actually rather eager to accelerate even with 4 adults + 1 child but that noise from the CVT though.
I guess, as a "family-man", one should drive sensibly.
Saw in news the new altis will have torsion beam instead of double wishbone rear suspension in Taiwan
Anybody had experience with Toyota torsion beam? How’s the ride?
Sucks to see it happening TBH. Mazda 3 torsion beam was already bad.
If torsion beam is indeed coming to malaysia, Honda civic will be the undisputed king in this segment
Mana ada? You don't cheebye claim Toyota Taiwan specs is worse than Malaysia, okay? Taiwan specs is always better, even got GR specs. Don't simply flame my country, okay?