Austral Yarra Link, a gated and guarded community providing an ease of mind for its residents with the
installation of CCTV's separate entrances for visitors and home owners, intercom to guard house and 24 hours security petrol. Austral Yarra Link skilled gardeners and maintenance crew will upkeep the beautiful landscaped paths creating a perfect ambience for the living.

hmmmm

Hum..... There are few thing in there web site I think is not correct....

1. The map that highlight the whole area is belong to Austral... but there are big piese of that is actually belong to LS, glomac...

2. "TRUE LAKESIDE", did they able to see the lake? The way I look at the lake, it seen like not much space that really "LAKESIDE"....

If you go to Austral site office where they display the house model, you will see masterplan as shown in the website...colour, beautiful..without any signature. :-)
Do you have copy with approved signature by MBSJ to share, since you are so "kam cheng" with Austral.

If you go in a separate room where site engineer/QS working with all the drawings.
Interesting enough you will see an approved masterplan haging at one corner...but it was not for austral, but for Glomac Lakeside residences ...with signature of land owner representative, GlomaK GED and MPSJ YDP (with name) dated 10-Jan-2004
Do not know have they remove that masterplan by now...:-)

1. It does belong to Austral
Austral Yaara link is a development done by the landowner themselves.
Glomac is a joint venture partner only. not the land owner. and glomac's JV agreement has been terminated since middle of this year.

2. Well the bungalow is next to the lake, you may probably find people from YTL's clubhouse looking into your backyard after the completion and where else would you find full length lake side bungalows in SEA?



Ofc i do not have a copy, since im not involved onsite

and im not "kam cheng" la.. just happen to know of some stuff

But if you were to follow the initial plan, Austral yaara Link homes would not be able to have started at all, that shows that there is an newer approved plan, and what was seen was the outdated plan, mainly because in development, there is always improvements done to the master plan.
The plan has been approved already as what you probably saw in the site office, currently now its in the process of being formalized thats all

This post has been edited by bryanyeo87: Dec 29 2007, 12:28 AM

Initial plan of Austral Yarra Link homes is only part of 200 acres, which consist of 70 over units 2 1/2 story link house..hope my memory is correct for the number of units :-). If you refer to the news, after complain from from the factory lots owner a letter was issued by Housing and local govermnet ministry to stop the sales..:-)..see no approval also hehe

As you mention it still in the process of being formalized ??? that also mean no approval yet :-)
You only get approval once you have formalized everything.
Any evidence to prove that the masterplan approved dated 10-Jan-2004 by MPSJ is outed?
It is not an easy task to have one masterplan approved by MPSJ to be changed or modified.
Do not just speculate without hard evidence. :-) hehe any scanned copy of letters from MPSJ etc. to support your speculation :-) ?
It good to share ...:-)

1. I don't know much about the agreement, but as a buyer concern, no matter how the prject belong to who, but the fact is the Glomac project already there with 100+ house that ready to move in soon and they surely not belong to Austral. So, if they just simply hide others, for me this look like an sale stratage to hide the true from the buyer.

2 hum... may be you are right, it can be few bungalow can see the lake... True, as long as you have a lease 1 bungalow with lake side, then you can said that. Sorry, I just confuse that if I see the lake from the Small industril area, most of lake side is access from Glomac, and the new warehouse. Only 1 small piese of lakeside in between Glomac & warehouse that cover by tree that can't really identified access from which developer...

---

Added on January 2, 2008, 12:16 pmFYI, the road still not open yet since yesterday. just question, how long time given to an company allowed to hold on any action that after a summoned given by MPSJ?

---

Added on January 9, 2008, 1:43 pmRoad still not open ler!

This post has been edited by jejes: Jan 9 2008, 01:43 PM

Ya, pass by there, wanted to have a look on the Austral project, but road closed! How to see!

somebody stated that MPSJ has directed that the Road to be opened up.

I went there yesterdat and the week before, still JALAN MATI

Hmm....

bryanyeo, do you mind to tell me what is your relationship between you and the developer ?

If you read the first page of this thread...


...so obviously he wouldnt be staying in two units at once. I guess it's just natural he will (or is doing it right now?) release one of them, and would sing praises for the property in discussion.

Acutally I have some interest on this project, but since like so many issue... road closed, court case.... try follow some forumer suggest access the road from the factory area, manage to get in but the sale office is closed. Then do some finding, found below news on newspaper... it mentions the Gov already stop this developer to sale the unit....
hum... wounder if the ex-SMI owner won the case how the project going to be?

http://www.chinapress.com.my/content_new.a...rt=1126lk04.txt

haha, your quite behind time, it is now stale news, like a piece of moldy bread.

The fact is that, they had a meeting with the Ministry and the Director of Land in december 2007 and the company was given the go ahead.

I heard that the representative was given a warning by the Ministry to stick to the facts and dont simply make wild accusations

I actually do sympathize with the buyers who paid good money to MBF some 11 to 12 years ago.

You may call the stated mobile number in the newspaper link above to check the freshly baked bread and let us know how true and fresh it is la

From the Link given


Translated version
http://translate.google.com/translate?u=ht...&hl=en&ie=UTF-8

This post has been edited by bryanyeo87: Jan 16 2008, 06:27 PM

I see, if that is so, i must agree that MBSJ is a toothless tiger even after warning and ordering the block remove to glomac, no action was taken.

MBSJ can frighten and threaten some hawkers since hawkers are like taufu, but the mighty beefy glomac is a different story la, MBSJ cannot "bite" the beef since they are like a "toothless tiger" hahaha

I do hope some of MBSJ reps are reading this, toothless tiger haha, perhaps a pair of steel dentures will help them look more serious so that glomac will take MBSJ more seriously and to give MBSJ more "bite" to the mighty beefy glomac LoL

This post has been edited by bryanyeo87: Jan 16 2008, 04:00 PM

You may right, the news may be few month back, but can yo find me any news in newspaper or any official news in the net? Because news in paper at least they will have some fact before they publish out....

another fact is, when I went to there sale office is closed, so... that make me think it related to above news...

Also, the news mention " in the contract has indicated the new developer for the owner to apply the individual title deed, therefore the new developer must fulfill the pledge"

That mean the new developer have to do something.... if it really stated in the contract.

Hum.... I think just forget about this project until they are clear on everything...

Bryanyeo,

just wanted to double check with you...i asked earlier if you were sure of the usj puchong link road and you siad they will call the tender by december 07.

It has come and gone and while there has been news of road projects in other parts of puchong, there has been no mention of the usj link at all.

Moreover, in the local draft which is circulating now by MPSJ, there isnt any mention of the link at all. How can that be if it is an approved project at tender stage.

Can you shed some light?

Not entirely true. Even news papers make mistakes because we are still humans.

But the fact that they had a meeting with the Ministry and Director of Land in december 2007, that supercedes all past statements and claims as a resolution was concluded. And as well as the go ahead to austral to continue the sales of yaara link.

Anyway, when was it when you went to the site office? and what time?




well, afaik, the money for the bridge has been paid to mbsj by the 3 developers in that area, so... money pocketed but work not done, normal la, gamen

no idea, as im not much of a mbsj fan :S
currently mbsj is having a bigger thing to address, the cemetery issue for example :S

This post has been edited by bryanyeo87: Jan 17 2008, 02:15 PM

I don't think MBSJ scare of them. MBSJ is one of the riches gov body, glomac is nothing compare to IOI... Can't really see that possible. Some more if what you tell is true that they already been summon, then MBSJ can just pass the case to police/court case if they reject the instruction.

But what I think is either there aren't any summon to Glomac or if there is, maybe Glomac got there right to hold the summon cause as you said that part of the road still belong to Glomac ownership. "Why can't I block my own road?" Since People in there still got another road to access...

I guess all this will only settle after the court case in Feb.

Anyone have any idea what happen to this project?
hear that has been stop development...

thats really bad........

project revived...