i always try to have this case when solve it...white facing up with white cross...since it has no optional case.. yeah i want to know faster method to pair this up

Quackery in speedcubing?

How many of you agreed that before speedcubing a solved cube must be first scrambled before the audience of your choice - mostly for youtube viewers or other means - as part of the video evident to convince?

A lots of showcase I saw on youtube neglect this important aspect of speedcubing. Most would just pick up seemingly randomised cube to begin with. The reason for doubt here being you can practice offhand to memorise, and improve moves efficiency the same scrambled cube used for the video recording without change.

Not doubt with the same scrambled cube practiced relentlessly improvement over personal best in time can be recorded.

For me, although I’m still new in speedcubing, the ideal methodology is to use some facility online to scramble a solved cube before speedcubing. Starting from the scrambling step, as provided by any facility, until the final solution should all be recorded in one continuous video. Here, the given scrambling algorithm and actual scrambling of a solved cube must be seen before one can start speedcubing. There should be not black out scenes, etc. the same cube must be visible all the time till the end.

Just my thought. If you have any valid view to disqualify it, please share.

anyone here use an original rubiks cube for speedcubing ? those normal ones , not the DIY ones i mean

ah , nice . may be getting one .... cause kinda desperate since friend borrowed mine since thursday .....

but damn its fun , even though its only been one week since i started cubing 

times good ?

any sos ?

nice . my best is only at 1.5 mins now

the beginners 7 step algorithm . my f2l is slower than it actually  . i spend too much time looking and thinking

the 7 cases of cross...but i just focus on sune,anti-sune, and the wheel
for pll...i focus on when u get two same color on corner...but of course it faster if u memorise all oll and pll...

I'm playing rubik's cube and I solve it in 45 seconds.

Get your average down to 50s, then we talk F2L.

Practice.
May I ask how long have you been using intuitive F2L? And what was your average before you use F2L?
Without a clear breakdown of your time (cross, F2L, LL), I would speculate that your total F2L execution is roughly around 28-35s. This would imply that you are pausing too much when looking for CE pairs. So, you might need to work on that. If you havent done so, do the metronome technique for 2-weeks straight. That would help your flow tremendously.