alright..this is cool...i defrag my laptop very often...and this turn out to be a very good tool for me..
thanks...
JKDefrag v3.26, Free Yet High Efficient Defragmenter.
JKDefrag v3.26, Free Yet High Efficient Defragmenter.
|
|
Nov 20 2007, 11:10 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
836 posts Joined: Oct 2005 From: Jedi Temple, Coruscant |
alright..this is cool...i defrag my laptop very often...and this turn out to be a very good tool for me..
thanks... |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 21 2007, 01:27 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
965 posts Joined: Mar 2005 From: Pluto |
Thanks for the update!
|
|
|
Nov 22 2007, 05:49 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,479 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sarawak |
QUOTE(aMer @ Nov 19 2007, 06:07 PM) hei guys..download Jkdefrag GUI here..they are all made by different authors, so pick one you like..see screenshots on those pages which one is better?http://www.paehl.com/open_source/?JGDefragGUI http://thorsten-willert.de/Software/JKDefrag_TWGUI/ http://thommy88.th.funpic.de/index.php?men...ragstarter.html http://www.emro.nl/freeware/ |
|
|
Nov 23 2007, 12:27 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,630 posts Joined: Jul 2005 |
i've tried it but can tell me in what sense this JKDefrag is better? I can only say that this program is faster than the normal 1.
|
|
|
Nov 23 2007, 11:01 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,627 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sepang,Cheras,Jupiter |
|
|
|
Nov 24 2007, 10:52 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
23 posts Joined: May 2006 |
QUOTE(Musafir_86 @ Oct 10 2007, 08:56 AM) -Oh, I didn't catch the word background before. Yes, why should you defrag all the time as this will wear out your disk faster? Also, if 2 program accessing same files (the program you're running & the background defragmenter), wouldn't this will actually slow you down? can i noe the automatic defragment of diskeeper really hurts the hardisk???Regards. it will wear out the hardisk faster? then why the diskeeper introduce such function and is still get nice response? |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 25 2007, 10:08 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
836 posts Joined: Oct 2005 From: Jedi Temple, Coruscant |
QUOTE(sooi @ Nov 24 2007, 10:52 AM) can i noe the automatic defragment of diskeeper really hurts the hardisk??? i also suspect sometimes...i defrag kinda very often...and i guess maybe this is one of the reason that i kena the windows error blue screen...despite i do downloading awys also...it will wear out the hardisk faster? then why the diskeeper introduce such function and is still get nice response? correct me if im wrong..thanks in advance... |
|
|
Nov 29 2007, 11:22 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
541 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: Sungai Petani/Alor Setar (Kedah). |
QUOTE(sooi @ Nov 24 2007, 10:52 AM) can i noe the automatic defragment of diskeeper really hurts the hardisk??? it will wear out the hardisk faster? then why the diskeeper introduce such function and is still get nice response? QUOTE(jediknight7sam @ Nov 25 2007, 10:08 PM) i also suspect sometimes...i defrag kinda very often...and i guess maybe this is one of the reason that i kena the windows error blue screen...despite i do downloading awys also... -Hmm, you can refer the FAQs (answered by JKDefrag author himself) on the JkDefrag main page. Also, here's what Executive Software said about that : http://www.diskeeper.com/diskeeper/myths/hard-drive-wear.asp.correct me if im wrong..thanks in advance... -I'm pointing that continuously defragmenting your harddisks in the background will wear out the disks. Why? Refer to above link (Diskeeper site); they talk about numerous disk accesses (read/write ops) required for fragmented files. Then, how about constantly defragmenting some files as they are modified? The original programs alter the specified files, then the Diskeeper touches it (to defrag) again. Doesn't that increases disk access counts? Note that this only affects files that are modified frequently, and/or change in size (getting bigger/smaller) during modifications, or different clusters being used. For static files (even they're accessed many times), this doesn't apply as Diskeeper doesn't touch them. -This is based on my personal calculation. Hope that help. Thanks. Regards. |
|
|
Dec 1 2007, 07:00 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,173 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: PCH |
JKDefrag v3.30 - Download (ZIP)
JKDefrag v3.30 (November 30, 2007) Changes: - FAT disks are now analysed by directly reading the FAT from disk. This is a lot faster, and finds more system files. - Changes to the graphics routines in the Windows and screensaver versions. The screen is now updated faster and more efficiently. - Added the "average begin-end distance" statistic to the report. - The commandline is now scanned for the "-l" logfile option before anything is written to the logfile. - Changed the progress counter for the Fixup phase. - Added a second fixup phase after optimizing "-a 3" to catch files that could not be moved the first time. - Bugfix for automatic processing of volumes that are mounted on a directory instead of a drive letter. Source : Neowin.Net Official Site : Kessels This post has been edited by sniper69: Dec 1 2007, 07:00 AM |
|
|
Dec 1 2007, 08:48 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,291 posts Joined: Dec 2004 From: I Luv Msia |
strongly recommend using JkDefragGUI v1.00 (updated on 1st dec, 2007), it is using jkdefrag core with nice interface and many of additional features
http://www.emro.nl/freeware |
|
|
Dec 1 2007, 01:01 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
301 posts Joined: Jan 2006 |
sniper69
thanks for the update =) |
|
|
Dec 1 2007, 01:10 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
294 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Cat CiteYy |
there's another good software too, "O&O Defrag" can give it a try..... freeware...
This post has been edited by mars: Dec 1 2007, 01:10 PM |
|
|
Dec 6 2007, 01:14 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,275 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: 192.168.200.45 |
Today is download softwares for me...have to try this also..
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 6 2007, 03:37 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,627 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sepang,Cheras,Jupiter |
please try JKDefragGUI 1.0
very nice |
|
|
Dec 6 2007, 10:48 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
742 posts Joined: Mar 2007 From: Shaw or West End or Foggy Bottom or somewhere else |
thanks for the nice software...
|
|
|
Dec 7 2007, 01:46 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,041 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
defragmentation increases wear and tear. not recommended to defrag too often.
|
|
|
Dec 7 2007, 09:48 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
17,023 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
How fast is fast you guys defrag? I DL JKDefragGUI and start defrag yesterday at 6pm. But now 9.45pm still defrag at 72%. Is there some problem with the pc?
And this JKDefrag can't choose the drive to defrag. Once I double click the JKDefrag, it go to C drive and defrag straight away. Am I miss something? This post has been edited by ozak: Dec 7 2007, 09:48 AM |
| Change to: | 0.0193sec
0.87
5 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 20th December 2025 - 07:05 PM |