Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
JKDefrag v3.26, Free Yet High Efficient Defragmenter.
|
bluesky87
|
Oct 9 2007, 02:21 PM
|
|
QUOTE(amenlo9 @ Oct 7 2007, 02:21 AM) thanks for sharing.will not using diskeeper anymore I'm currently using Diskeeper and somehow the *ahem* problem cause it not to auto defrag anymore. My main purpose of using a third party software rather than the windows default defragmenter is the ability to auto defrag. Just wanna ask if this software has the ability to auto defrag in background using very low resources? Will download it straight away after the answer
|
|
|
|
|
|
bluesky87
|
Oct 10 2007, 12:52 PM
|
|
QUOTE(sotong168 @ Oct 10 2007, 05:48 AM) @bluesky87, it doesn't has background auto defrag as the author doesn't recommend it as well. QUOTE(Musafir_86 @ Oct 10 2007, 08:56 AM) -Oh, I didn't catch the word background before. Yes, why should you defrag all the time as this will wear out your disk faster? Also, if 2 program accessing same files (the program you're running & the background defragmenter), wouldn't this will actually slow you down? Regards. sotong168 thanks you so much for the info. Musafir_86 thanks for your advise. My thought was actually the duration of defragmentation which means how long will it take to defrag my hdd. I didn't know that defraging all the time will actually wear out my drive. I see you've got your point and I think I'll either roll back to the default windows defragmenter or give it a shot on this piece of program Thanks anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
|
bluesky87
|
Oct 11 2007, 04:58 PM
|
|
Downloaded and tested. It actually took quite long to defrag my 200gb drive which separated into three partition. I don't really know the details about defragmentation but what I get after defraging is it speed up my shut down time and when I analyze using the default Windows Disk Defragmenter, those color were arranged accordingly unlike last time even after defrag still look messy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
bluesky87
|
Oct 11 2007, 09:45 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Skylinestar @ Oct 11 2007, 05:34 PM) are you guys using the GUI version or the original version? Actually what's the different? Sorry for the noob question but what is GUI? I just went to their website and download, extract and run JkDefrag only
|
|
|
|
|
|
bluesky87
|
Oct 13 2007, 05:11 AM
|
|
QUOTE(sotong168 @ Oct 12 2007, 04:11 PM) GUI is user friendly as it provides options interface while non-GUI need to use command to customize. I recommend GUI version. Thanks for your explanation. The one I'm using is the GUI version not the command version.
|
|
|
|
|
|
bluesky87
|
Nov 21 2007, 01:27 AM
|
|
Thanks for the update!
|
|
|
|
|