Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
39 Pages « < 33 34 35 36 37 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Military Thread V29

views
     
Mai189
post Oct 10 2024, 05:45 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2018
QUOTE(takbodoh722 @ Oct 10 2024, 04:37 PM)
No one checked? Really Sucks. Even if the US grants approval, someone needs 2 pay for the integration costs.

QUOTE
This requires US approval. A feasibility study is underway, all is to happen in 3-4 years. Technically this is doable, but other areas need to be addressed. KAI is currently working on such research and the matter is to be clarified in 2-3 years. KAI does know this is important.


https://defence24.com/armed-forces/air-forc...-50s-commentary
Mai189
post Oct 10 2024, 06:18 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2018
QUOTE(Mai189 @ Oct 9 2024, 09:37 PM)
Singapore, South Korea to form strategic partnership by 2025; boost economic and defence ties

The upgrade is ‘not just a change in name’, says Prime Minister Lawrence Wong

https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/singapore/...nd-defence-ties



‐----------------

This is as close to a treaty alliance (which Sg has eschewed in its diplomatic relations with other countries) as it gets.

Union of the 2 Asian developed nations one rung below Japan is a critical development. Both have well established defence R & D and industries. Most importantly - both countries are rich!
*
user posted image
Source: Sg govt

https://www.yahoo.com/news/president-yoon-s...-045059282.html

This post has been edited by Mai189: Oct 10 2024, 06:19 PM
Mai189
post Oct 11 2024, 10:23 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2018
As shared there is no reason for US 2 object.

F18 C/Ds are no longer in production i.e. yesterdays generation wont pose a security concern.
Mai189
post Oct 14 2024, 11:19 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2018


Sg has obtained additional Spyder SR systems albiet configured differently and deployed them as part of its ground maneuvering forces. So they will follow these forces. These will likely be linked up with Drome Dome which Sg also has:

https://aviationweek.com/air-transport/airp...e-system-changi

https://kementah.blogspot.com/2023/09/repub...rsaf_9.html?m=1





Previously Spyder SR systems were deployed only as part of its layered Island Air Defence system together with other systems such as Aster 30 Blk 1, Bolide, Drome Dome, etc.

Spyder Sr has a range of 40km with the latest Derby ER missile and 10-12km with Python 5 missile combo.

Spyder has 1) anti ballistic missile (against SRBM), 2) CRAM (against MLRS rockets) and 3) anti aircraft/anti uav/anti cruise missile capabilities.

The 4 missile launch boxes can be increased to 8 per necessity. There are > 6 (vehicle missile launcher) × 4 (or 8) missiles firing units per system. So abt 24 to 48 missiles before reloads.

This post has been edited by Mai189: Oct 14 2024, 06:04 PM
Mai189
post Oct 15 2024, 06:11 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2018
13 0ct 24 - First steel cutting for Sg 4 RSNs OPVs. Whilst it is based on Fassmer Portsdam class (baseline design) I do not think thats how she will eventually look like.

Sgs incoming 8000 ton to 10000 ton MRCV heavy frigate/destroyers are stealthy and look different and are larger than the 5000+ ton to 6000+ ton baseline Iver Huitfelt frigate design.

Additionally, the OPVs are expected to embark USVs, vtol UAVs, vls cells, etc. and need the space to do so together with accompanying mission modules.

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

Source: RSN

Possible design:

user posted image

Portsdam class OPV:

user posted image
user posted image

This post has been edited by Mai189: Oct 16 2024, 10:38 AM
Mai189
post Oct 15 2024, 06:30 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2018
The OPVs (lets call it the Sentinel 2 class for now) will replace the Sentinel class corvettes:

user posted image

user posted image

Her main priority is maritime security and patrol. However, RSN has already shared that all her ships will multi role. As such, her secondary role is expected to be that of a general purpose surface combatant ( in support of other ships such as the MRCVs, Formidables, Independence class, etc.) especially in times of conflict.

Standard armaments are expected to include both lethal and non lethal weapons; VL MICA Ng ( >40 km) point/ local area defence, 76mm Strales Oto Melara cannon, 30mm Typhoon cannons and containerised mission modules (as required) for add-on systems such as kamikaze/sensor UAVs or Blue Spear land attack/anti ship missiles (not export variant as Sg is Blue Spears OEM missile manufacturer):

user posted image

user posted image

First ship is expected 2 be commissioned by 2028.

Interesting info: The current Sentinel class was enhanced to take physical hits and ram other ships. This feature is expected 2 be incorporated into the OPVs too

Depending on finalised size and sensor/weapon fit at said point of time, this so called OPV may well end up as a general purpose light frigate.

This post has been edited by Mai189: Oct 16 2024, 07:34 AM
Mai189
post Oct 15 2024, 09:45 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2018


Ok. This is beyond old - built in the 1960s.
Mai189
post Oct 16 2024, 10:21 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2018
Bankrupt Avibras aka maker of Astross mlrs system will be acquired by Australias Defendtex:

https://www.defenceconnect.com.au/industry/...date-draws-near

user posted image

So who owns Defendtex? A quick check shows 2 investors - both entities are formally part of the...Australian Govt.

As Avibras new owners, there is doubt over the future of the Astross systems with Defendtex (given its key business portfolio of making unmanned systems) probably only interested in certain IP info from Avibras such as propellant tech.

Further, Avibras Astross portfolio may no longer be profitable given better competing systems from the US, East Asia, Israel, Europe and Russia to justify Defendtexs further investments for R & D. Note: Defendtex has had to take loans for this acquisition.

Curtains down Astross..sob sob.

This post has been edited by Mai189: Oct 16 2024, 10:26 AM
Mai189
post Oct 16 2024, 11:01 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2018
QUOTE(takbodoh722 @ Oct 16 2024, 10:57 AM)
selow. Australia already backed out. then china firm offered whch spooked the govt. Then try public sector bailout but no money. Now looking a private sector bailout....Avibras still in limbo. That what can happen in a few months of news.
*
It appears you are right:

https://www.avibras.com.br/site/en/media-en...-investors.html

My goodness.
Mai189
post Oct 16 2024, 12:20 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2018
Good vid of the 2 carriers (tho some wld classify the Cavour as more of a LHA):


Mai189
post Oct 16 2024, 10:14 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2018

Mai189
post Oct 16 2024, 10:24 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2018
Who could buy such an expensive 5th/6th gen aircraft? Then again; operators of 4.5 gen F15s/Super Hornets may not have much of an option if NGAD foreign sales are banned like the F22.

QUOTE
The GCAP will be in competition with other advanced fighters, such as the US Next Generation Air Dominance (NGAD). “It’s uncertain,” Davis said in an email, “whether the US will export NGAD, so by Japan opening up its options to export, they may (alongside their GCAP partners) be able to tap into a market that the US is unwilling to enter.”


QUOTE
Who might Japan sell GCAP to? “South Korea is unlikely to buy it because KF-21 leads to a future ROK sixth-gen system,” Davis argues. “For Australia, if we can’t get NGAD to replace F-35 then might we look at GCAP? Possibly? But the key issue for Australia is how the crewed-autonomous mix plays out in the next decade with F-35 and MQ-28.”


QUOTE
“Ideally, GCAP or NGAD could operate alongside F-35A and MQ-28 through the 2030s and 40s,” Davis said. “ASEAN air forces? I doubt it, or I doubt they’d be able to afford significant numbers of GCAP platforms.”

ASEAN includes few states likely to spend the high prices required to buy fifth-generation fighters, let alone sixth-generation ones. The most likely state to do so, Singapore, committed to buying eight F-35As this year and has already bought 12 F-35Bs. It also flies F-15s and F-16s. Moving to an aircraft with a substantial quantity of British, Italian and Japanese technology would be a difficult decision to support for a country with an all-American fleet.


https://breakingdefense.com/2024/03/japan-c...-plan-for-gcap/
Mai189
post Oct 25 2024, 12:38 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2018
QUOTE(Mai189 @ Oct 15 2024, 06:11 PM)
13 0ct 24 - First steel cutting for Sg 4 RSNs OPVs. Whilst it is based on Fassmer Portsdam class  (baseline design) I do not think thats how she will eventually look like.

Sgs incoming 8000 ton to 10000 ton MRCV heavy frigate/destroyers are stealthy and look different and are larger than the 5000+ ton to 6000+ ton baseline Iver Huitfelt frigate design.

Additionally, the OPVs are expected to embark USVs, vtol UAVs, vls cells, etc. and need the space to do so together with accompanying mission modules.

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

Source: RSN

Possible design:

user posted image

Portsdam class OPV:

user posted image
user posted image
*


A larger version of the Portdam OPV ^. Use the 76mm Oto Melara cannon as a gauge.

This post has been edited by Mai189: Oct 25 2024, 12:39 PM
Mai189
post Oct 25 2024, 12:42 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2018


Thats not just a new kneel but an entire module.

Beam of 20m? Goodness it is really around 10000 tons at full load.

^ A demonstration of the speed/efficiency and precision of Sgs ST Eng next generation shipyard:



This post has been edited by Mai189: Oct 25 2024, 12:47 PM
Mai189
post Oct 25 2024, 12:50 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2018
QUOTE(Mai189 @ Oct 7 2024, 05:23 PM)



*
Internet chatter says likely this one^



This post has been edited by Mai189: Oct 25 2024, 01:09 PM
Mai189
post Oct 25 2024, 07:24 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2018
US, Singapore to work together on counter-drone, electronic warfare tech

QUOTE
In line with that mission, the new memorandum of understanding commits the two countries to cooperate on adopting tech that has both commercial and military uses. The main areas of focus for this work will be on maritime security and counter-drone systems, according to a Defense Department statement.


QUOTE
Part of the agreement will include “joint challenges” for counter-drone tech launched from ships, while another portion focuses on making systems resilient to jamming and other electronic warfare capabilities. The challenges are a way to kick-start the two countries’ work, Beck said in an interview.


QUOTE
These challenges resemble one held earlier this year by the U.S., the U.K. and Australia as part of AUKUS, a defense pact focused on nuclear-powered submarines and other advanced technology. The AUKUS competition allows defense companies from all three countries to compete around a problem focused on electronic warfare.


https://www.defensenews.com/pentagon/2024/0...c-warfare-tech/




Mai189
post Oct 26 2024, 11:09 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2018


user posted image

user posted image

This post has been edited by Mai189: Oct 26 2024, 11:13 AM
Mai189
post Oct 26 2024, 11:31 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2018


This post has been edited by Mai189: Oct 26 2024, 11:32 AM
Mai189
post Oct 26 2024, 01:18 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2018


Looks like a recent upgrade or perhaps different variant^

user posted image

This post has been edited by Mai189: Oct 26 2024, 01:21 PM
Mai189
post Oct 27 2024, 10:09 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2018
QUOTE(Mai189 @ Oct 25 2024, 12:38 PM)


A larger version of the Portdam OPV ^. Use the 76mm Oto Melara cannon as a gauge.
*
Like the MRCV RSN seems to be playing peek a boo on the size and capability of the new OPVs which is based on Germanys Portsdam class OPV:

https://www.australiandefence.com.au/defenc...ts-fassmer-opvs

The Portsdam class is about 87m long, 13.5m wide and with tonnage between 1900 tons to 2000 tons.

I cannot find any other picture of the incoming RSN OPV apart from the one in NavalNews site.

Similar to the MRCV when i did a size comparison with the Iver Huifelt baseline design (6000+ ton ship) and suggested that the MRCV is a much larger vessel (I was right as the MRCV is a 8000+ ton to 10000 ton ship), ill attempt to do one now for RSNs OPV.

Taking the funnel like structure at the rear-end of the superstructure and superstructure itself, youd see that RSNs OPVs are also larger vessels compared to the baseline Portsdam class OPV. We can also use 76mm Oto Melara gun at the front of RSNs OPV to visualise the huge superstructure.

This is a probably a ship of 2000+ ton to 4000 tonnage (at full load). Frigate-size OPV.



user posted image
user posted image
user posted image
user posted image

This post has been edited by Mai189: Oct 27 2024, 10:30 AM

39 Pages « < 33 34 35 36 37 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0728sec    0.63    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 02:40 PM