Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
5 Pages < 1 2 3 4 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Military Thread V29

views
     
KLthinker91
post Feb 11 2023, 11:19 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
227 posts

Joined: Feb 2019
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(icemanfx @ Feb 11 2023, 08:57 AM)
Given pla is almost at our door steps, mindef need to conduct strategic review before decide what weapons to purchase and priority. under bn gomen, platforms were largely chosen by the whim of the minister often against services recommendation.

rmn primary role should be securing the straits of malacca and scs.
*
submarines would be useful in any military operation so it's a no-brainer decision really
also, 4 of anything is really a minimum buy when it comes to ships; if you're going to run a kedai mamak 24 jam, obviously you need more than 2 staff right? takkan each staff on 12 hours?

however, there's a valid question in asking if conventional military capability is what we need right now. IMVHO our priorities should be EEZ patrol and anti-piracy, and we need coast guard-type boats for that, not subs
KLthinker91
post Feb 18 2023, 07:48 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
227 posts

Joined: Feb 2019
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(Raddus @ Feb 18 2023, 06:53 PM)
EEZ patrol and anti piracy is exactly what MMEA should be doing

Our Subs is still needed for conventional war deterrence

It has nothings to do with anti piracy
*
I don't think we can afford both
KLthinker91
post Feb 20 2023, 03:02 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
227 posts

Joined: Feb 2019
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(James831 @ Feb 19 2023, 05:35 AM)
*
lol
I've seen better guides from Western defence bloggers
typical Rybar half past six info

QUOTE(Raddus @ Feb 18 2023, 07:52 PM)
We can afford if we dont do stupid local assemblies like the LCS mess

Just buy from supplier and have them built and sent to malaysia
*
even if we do that, I doubt we have enough money
country's GDP is low

This post has been edited by KLthinker91: Feb 20 2023, 03:03 AM
KLthinker91
post Feb 20 2023, 01:43 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
227 posts

Joined: Feb 2019
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(darth5zaft @ Feb 20 2023, 06:39 AM)
NOPE.
Case in point is the little bird & Turkish MRAP.
It still cost double what others usually paid despite it being built overseas. The FA50 we going to buy cost $ 50 mil which is just slightly less than a f16.

*
The Little Birds cost is not that far off inclusive of support contracts

The FA50 contract is a bit expensive but again, not that far off; my estimate of the upgraded model was 50 million each flyaway cost

The F16 is not that cheap unless you want the ancient outdated models
KLthinker91
post Feb 24 2023, 07:49 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
227 posts

Joined: Feb 2019
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(takbodoh722 @ Feb 21 2023, 09:34 AM)

Spyder is interesting because the missiles are dual use or can be used by fighters.
*
just about all air-to-air missiles can be launched from the ground, they just need a booster to get them into the target vicinity

QUOTE(takbodoh722 @ Feb 20 2023, 09:15 PM)

Another innovation that the Sinkies did was to use ljdam for anti ship. That raised a few eyebrows when the muricans first saw how the sinkies were using  the F-15s.
*
Bombs have always been used by NATO for antiship work, and laser-guided bombs were used in naval combat before JDAMs were invented
KLthinker91
post Feb 24 2023, 07:04 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
227 posts

Joined: Feb 2019
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(takbodoh722 @ Feb 24 2023, 11:29 AM)
Yet zero of Malaysia's AAMs are ground launched. None of Malaysia's ground launched SAMs are air launched. Bomb use not so simple.

In theory and in forums, everything always possible.
*
bomb use memang not simple for those who don't know how to click reply button

Malaysia actually did operate an air to air missile as a SAM before

but since we have not bought the SAM launchers for our current AAMs, obviously we cannot launch them from the ground

QUOTE(darth5zaft @ Feb 24 2023, 07:03 PM)
Been there done that. While it sounds great in some people mind, in reality . Purchasing stuff directly overseas with foreign currencies without NO socioeconomic contribution to the local community & industry is extremely unattractive.

It would just lead the gov to either buy less that what MAF required like the Caracas or not buy anything at all.
*
well, our LCS programme thanks you very much for your socioeconomic contribution to the local community & industry

if purchasing stuff directly means we get less results than license-building it locally, then thank goodness we didn't buy the LCS direct, if we had, then we would end up with -1 ships sailing the seas, and we'd probably owe the French an additional ship

mathematics! icon_rolleyes.gif

This post has been edited by KLthinker91: Feb 24 2023, 07:08 PM
KLthinker91
post Feb 25 2023, 08:04 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
227 posts

Joined: Feb 2019
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(darth5zaft @ Feb 25 2023, 04:30 AM)
If the LCS is bought directly from France it would still be sitting in the shipyard, get canned after 2 ship or turn into a OPV.

Because the main issue here is never about technical inabilities to glue ship together but because RMN refusals to utilise french missiles.
*
Well right now we have 0 ships so I fail to see any worse outcome

The main issue here is someone took the fucking money okay

QUOTE(icemanfx @ Feb 25 2023, 05:58 AM)
If USAF, jsdf, iaf, etc could replace f-15 with f-35, why not rsaf?
*
They aren't
The replacement for F15 in all these forces is a future aircraft

This post has been edited by KLthinker91: Feb 25 2023, 08:06 AM
KLthinker91
post Feb 26 2023, 12:10 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
227 posts

Joined: Feb 2019
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(darth5zaft @ Feb 25 2023, 11:56 PM)
Zero ship is better than buying the wrong ship.

*
I really fail to see how this is in any way the case
KLthinker91
post Feb 26 2023, 12:33 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
227 posts

Joined: Feb 2019
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(J2001k2 @ Feb 26 2023, 10:06 AM)
gotta love the speculation, guesswork and crystal ball gazing going on around here by "experts"........

I doubt RSAF.....

Rsaf f-15sg will likely remain.....

I suspect late 2020s.....

What one can expect.....

likely by 2025-26........


*
yeah well
Mai189 is well-known for his... unique perspective

QUOTE(takbodoh722 @ Feb 26 2023, 12:24 PM)
FPDA is limited. UK is a failed state. Like in ww2, any deployment will be too little, too late. New zealand doesn't have an air force. Malaysia has limited resources.

Real FPDA backbone has always been Sinkie & Oz but focus on peninsular Malaysia has been only oz after sinkie was banned from rakyat airspace.

*
what fantasy land are you living in LMAO
for the past 12 months UK has been proving just what kind of power they can still wield without even getting into combat


KLthinker91
post Feb 26 2023, 01:47 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
227 posts

Joined: Feb 2019
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(Mai189 @ Feb 26 2023, 01:08 PM)
I am a realist who likes connecting dots. Fun! You think the defence establishments tasked to do this in the countries concerned arent doing the same.
*
sweaty, you're no Kor Risik
real intel officers know better than to simply take photo ops serial numbers at face value

user posted image
KLthinker91
post Feb 26 2023, 02:20 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
227 posts

Joined: Feb 2019
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(Mai189 @ Feb 26 2023, 01:51 PM)
Taking pot shots again. That is why your views are often twisted.

And... bringing up an old issue I see..

You like to take pot shots when it suits you often with zero context. How one country manages its serial numbers may not be the same as how another does it. Minimally, I put related sources for reference for you to make up your own minds.

Ive said it before. Your emotions are getting the better of you. So grow up!
*
It's not a pot shot, it's a valid criticism of your method. You want to believe that SAF is squeaky honest about this, that's your business. Regarding your other, better-referenced conclusions, I have not commented negatively

If I want to take "pot shots", I have better shit to throw at you, personally, but I don't see the point in explicitly calling out people

So, YOU back the fuck off, and let's keep this nice and détente.

This post has been edited by KLthinker91: Feb 26 2023, 02:21 PM
KLthinker91
post Feb 26 2023, 02:24 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
227 posts

Joined: Feb 2019
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(takbodoh722 @ Feb 26 2023, 02:12 PM)

UK power in Ukraine? Lol. What power? All murican in Ukraine.

*
dunno means dunno rolleyes.gif

user posted image
KLthinker91
post Feb 26 2023, 02:47 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
227 posts

Joined: Feb 2019
From: Cherasboy
I don't explain shit to people who don't know how to tag
KLthinker91
post Feb 26 2023, 02:59 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
227 posts

Joined: Feb 2019
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(Mai189 @ Feb 26 2023, 02:54 PM)
Oh really! This was done and over it. And here you are resuscitating it again. You! And what is this? Threats? Grow up!

No one is asking you to pour your emotions all over the forum if you choose to disagree. It is your business to disagree or not. Or anyone for that matter. But if you choose to whine about it and take pot shots out of now where then get shit on your face - as Ive said it before.

Ive been very polite with you but I do not take back stabs too kindly. What detente? Grow up!
*
Ooo, somebody got triggered hard eh? Look back at the previous page and tell me who's being emotional here.

Anyway, I leave you be. As I said, I have no beef with you, if you want to make an issue out of it, itu hal kamu.

QUOTE(Mai189 @ Feb 26 2023, 02:57 PM)
Snarky!
*
Always wink.gif

This post has been edited by KLthinker91: Feb 26 2023, 02:59 PM
KLthinker91
post Feb 26 2023, 03:43 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
227 posts

Joined: Feb 2019
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(takbodoh722 @ Feb 26 2023, 03:39 PM)
"Dunno means dunno" - KL"Thinker"91
*
eh tiba tiba reti tag pulak
what happened? biggrin.gif
KLthinker91
post Feb 28 2023, 03:56 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
227 posts

Joined: Feb 2019
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(Mai189 @ Feb 28 2023, 03:52 PM)

*
do you think the increase is justified?
KLthinker91
post Apr 7 2023, 10:57 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
227 posts

Joined: Feb 2019
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(darth5zaft @ Apr 2 2023, 10:20 PM)
Essm are basically just amraam and python & mica are basically amraam alternative.
they really aren't

QUOTE
Basically SG like SK are diversifying away from US dependency.
*
SK uses Meteor because US doesn't yet have an equivalent (AIM-260 JATM is still developing IIRC)

QUOTE(Mai189 @ Apr 3 2023, 06:50 AM)
I have to agree with you on the F15Sg replacements. I doubt Sg or even Japan or Australia will get their hands on the 6th Gen  US NGAD fighter (which replaced the F22) or that it will take a long time.
*
there are structural reasons for SAF to get the US PCA fighter

the reasons why the SAF armament is so "diverse" is historical and capability-based:

at first SAF could only get the Igla so that is what they used
then they got access to Sidewinder
however they didn't yet get access to AMRAAM, so they bought Derby / Python instead
furthermore, the IADS they were setting up was Israeli-based, so it made sense to get Israeli weapons
hence they also bought Derby / Python SAMs for the Army which obviously is a massive upgrade over Igla
the medium-range air defence was now covered... but what about long range air defence?
at this point SG-US relations were not so well developed yet, with SG leaning European
furthermore the US was not building any ships suitable for SG use, and SG wanted naval warships
so they bought Formidable + Aster
Aster also equipped the SAF long range ground based air defence
so now the full SG IADS is complete
subsequently SG-US relations firmed and improved, and F-15 won the next fighter competition over Typhoon and Rafale, so now they had access to AMRAAMs, possibly the most capable long range air to air missile in SAF service

and that's the whole silly story
KLthinker91
post Apr 8 2023, 04:02 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
227 posts

Joined: Feb 2019
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(Mai189 @ Apr 7 2023, 11:25 PM)
Your story on the history a bit wonky but I'll leave it at that.
*
I'm interested to know your views on that
QUOTE(Mai189 @ Apr 7 2023, 11:41 PM)
I would put the Meteor to be in the same category as the Amraams 120 C7/C8/Ds as opposed to the Aim 260.
*
AIM-120D+ is meant to temporarily fulfil the extended range requirement, AIM-260 being the all-new missile body, however it is not a perfect solution. Even though it has the range, it doesn't have the ramjet, so its no-escape zone and kinematic performance although extended will not be anything like Meteor's

AIM-260 should be a ramjet like Meteor

This post has been edited by KLthinker91: Apr 8 2023, 04:03 AM
KLthinker91
post Apr 8 2023, 07:10 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
227 posts

Joined: Feb 2019
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(Mai189 @ Apr 8 2023, 04:36 AM)
So it begs the question of even having a more expensive Ramjet engine in the first place.
Higher velocity and bigger no escape zone over rocket motors
QUOTE
That is why modern air combat stresses on the need to see and shoot first. That is where reduced RCS matter too or commonly referred to as stealth. That is also where better sensors and an overarching sensor network with AEW and C, and netted air, sea and ground assets matter. The whole system will see you first.
In all domains now, sea, air and land
QUOTE
Circling back, I said Aim 260 is not in the same category as Meteor because  of AIM 260s claimed newer sensors , hypersonic speed  and range. Their makers also claimed better end game kinetic performance than amraams (note: it won't have Ramjet engines).
*
Meteor has its roots in early 00s design, it's no wonder that a missile being developed right now and not yet officially in service should have improved performance

I think it's safe to say that Meteor comfortably beats earlier marks of AMRAAM and overlaps with 120D and AIM-260
KLthinker91
post Apr 8 2023, 07:58 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
227 posts

Joined: Feb 2019
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(darth5zaft @ Apr 8 2023, 05:12 PM)

*
European users of F-35 will pay for Meteor
it is key to British and Scandinavian F-35 air dominance

QUOTE(Mai189 @ Apr 8 2023, 11:04 AM)

*
added cost is not because of the ramjet itself; European weapons are more expensive per unit due to lower production and higher cost of living

Peregrine and those missiles you listed are not fully developed yet, so don't count those chickens before they hatch. Recently, ARRW which you listed has been cancelled after its latest failure.

5 Pages < 1 2 3 4 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.1012sec    0.35    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 2nd December 2025 - 06:53 AM