AMD triple-core, if dual arent enough n quad overkill
|
|
 Sep 18 2007, 10:30 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Senior Member
1,966 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: No longer hanging by a NUS  
|
When you can't make 4 make 3 and call it a feature.
 But it'll be interesting to see how AMD markets this one: duals are cheap and quads are just slightly costlier; any tri-core would have to fit in the small gap in between. AMD already has their hands full with the fallout from Barcelona's muted launch and lukewarm market response + getting Phenom out. More SKUs = more work = more issues. |
|
|
Sep 21 2007, 10:01 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member
1,966 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: No longer hanging by a NUS
|
QUOTE(komag @ Sep 21 2007, 05:14 AM) What is AMD about to release on September 25, 2007? Venom sounds like Phenom...  QUOTE(ikanayam @ Sep 21 2007, 09:17 AM) So explain what your hint at G0 was about. We are interested to see what exactly you are thinking. Ah he's going to doublespeak on the whole B1/BA/B2 stepping again...And you are basing the whole future of a chip on rumors relating to a new stepping. I'm not sure your arguments are more credible. QUOTE Usually more cache = higher power consumption Nope cache is pretty low power compared to other parts of the CPU. |
| Change to: |  0.0165sec
 0.48
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 21st December 2025 - 10:48 PM |
Quote