So why Kedah used to pay ufti to Siam?

that's poor logic, of course you'd look at materials from other countries to contrast local materials. you cant say 'why didnt the british consult siam on penang?' when they did talk to siam years later on the entirety of kedah.

the best he could say is that kedah was a sovereign kingdom that was a vassal of siam, and argue the significance of tribute. tribute can be a recognition of the other's sovereignty over you, simply protection money, or in the unique system of china, a form of government trade (chinese emperor re-gifted more than what they receive, so kingdoms sent tributes often because its profitable).

Ahmad Murad Merican ...

ini anak murica  ????

actually Melaka until Temasik (Singapore) was ruled by Siam what,..

so a preacher try to change the history....are we going to get history book revised ? Soon this preacher going to say, we win the war over british and japan so british and japan never came here

Bangsa mamak maa...unlimited hikmat putaran alam semesta

these mamak really pandai putar halim I tell you

they are also not local but act like real local knn

Trying hard to become important

What is "colonised" in Malay?

In google translate, it just say dijajah also.

I don't think Malay makes a different between conquered, and colonized.

Hmmm....
I too was under that impression. dijajah = colonized

basically indian who convert to muslim

along the way become malay bumi

Sejarah books don't specifically introduce a specific word for it. It just used 'dikolonisasi' or 'menjadi koloni'.

My dad, who is a historian in Selangor, been talking about the difference between colonised and conquered since I was small. But this only came to the limelight recently. And he just sat back and said 'I told you so'.

But many historians still debating about this. Personally, I do agree that there's a difference between colonised and conquered. The conquered will have no political will, no governance, total assimilation to the conquering nation with their original identities suppressed.

y sultan Kedah so diam diam?

why the war lost to francis light ?

Sejarah books don't specifically introduce a specific word for it. It just used 'dikolonisasi' or 'menjadi koloni'.

My dad, who is a historian in Selangor, been talking about the difference between colonised and conquered since I was small. But this only came to the limelight recently. And he just sat back and said 'I told you so'.

But many historians still debating about this. Personally, I do agree that there's a difference between colonised and conquered. The conquered will have no political will, no governance, total assimilation to the conquering nation with their original identities suppressed.

Sejarah books don't specifically introduce a specific word for it. It just used 'dikolonisasi' or 'menjadi koloni'.

My dad, who is a historian in Selangor, been talking about the difference between colonised and conquered since I was small. But this only came to the limelight recently. And he just sat back and said 'I told you so'.

But many historians still debating about this. Personally, I do agree that there's a difference between colonised and conquered. The conquered will have no political will, no governance, total assimilation to the conquering nation with their original identities suppressed.

I only know Francis J. Underwood

Textbook fascist/ dictator wannabes