then people who dont mind to behind private IP should be given discount no?
its okay for TM to proceed with this exercise, but they need to make sure that people that are impacted have the option to get their dynamic public IP back. a clear 'NO, use IPv6' on the faq will just make people furious, especially for people who did host something on their home network.

Can get back la. I got back dy mine. Private to public.  Just need to call and everything settled in 2 hours.

i ask tm for public ip tm say cannot:( Looks like have to get another contract for fiber package. Tm tech said mine is already private ip.

Can get back la. I got back dy mine. Private to public.  Just need to call and everything settled in 2 hours.

Mind to explain more about the non-cloud cctv that will be affected by this? Say a non-cloud cctv that connected to the local dvr, to view it through the net mean I have to go through the provider side only reach mine local dvr?

Why can't I connect the dvr to internet and directly view it over the net?

Hmm, this guy can't seem to get his back 

we know TM will backtrack a bit.
they think the whole internet is ipv6 ready meh?
the company that i work hardly speak about ipv6 macam taboo topic already 

You don’t simply say want public ip. They don’t entertain.

Many Internet Service Providers implement a network configuration technique known as carrier-grade NAT or large-scale NAT. Wikipedia describes carrier-grade NAT:

“Carrier-grade NAT (CGN), also known as large-scale NAT (LSN), is an approach to IPv4 network design in which end sites, in particular residential networks, are configured with private network addresses that are translated to public IPv4 addresses by middlebox network address translator devices embedded in the network..."

Carrier-grade NAT, or CGN from here on, solves an IP addressing problem for ISPs, but causes a variety of problems for their customers. These problems are caused by CGN essentially interrupting what should be end-to-end connections, such as those established by Screens when connecting to a remote computer. For further information, see Assessing the Impact of NAT444 on Network Applications.

The following symptoms are associated with CGN-affected Screens connections:

Upon initiating a Screens connection to the IP address in question, the application will display "Connecting..." but the connection is never established.
The Screens diagnostics report will include a time-out error.
The remote IP address will fall within the range of 100.64.0.0 - 100.127.255.255. This block of addresses is set aside for "private" networks, such as ISPs.
You can check whether you’re on a CGN network by visiting a Web site such as ipaddress.com or whatsmyip.com and comparing the IP address listed to the public/WAN IP address assigned to your Internet gateway. To find your gateway’s public IP address, check the status page in the administrative interface. If the two IP addresses differ, you’re likely on a CGN network. If so, you will have trouble establishing Screens connections to the network in question, but it may be possible to request a static IP address from your ISP to avoid connectivity issues.

then say what? threaten them with SKMM & LOD?

So many ppl hosting own servers at home?

kinda noob.. how to check if our package already change to private ip?..

then say what? threaten them with SKMM & LOD?

check your PPPoE IP address on your router WAN settings.

if it is 10.x.x.x, 172.x.x.x or 192.168.x.x, then those are private IP.

owh i see... if i use the website what is my IP.... and then it shows there started with 192.XX.XX.XX.. meaning its private? can i just use that website to check my IP.. will that sufficient enough?

wanna masuk the Wan Settings at my router, im not that technical enough..... silly me..

no, you cant.
the website wont talk with you if your IP is private, thats the reason why there is large scale CGNAT were taking in place, public IP were given temporarily for that session only.

So many ppl hosting own servers at home?