QUOTE(pretty23 @ Sep 30 2021, 11:12 AM)
maybe its just typical greediness and wanted immediate gains sacrificing long term benefits.More than half of MM2H participants not renewing, bye bye $$$
More than half of MM2H participants not renewing, bye bye $$$
|
|
Sep 30 2021, 10:14 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,834 posts Joined: Jul 2006 From: here |
QUOTE(pretty23 @ Sep 30 2021, 11:12 AM) maybe its just typical greediness and wanted immediate gains sacrificing long term benefits. |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 30 2021, 11:00 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,834 posts Joined: Jul 2006 From: here |
QUOTE(Left4Dead2 @ Sep 30 2021, 11:45 AM) Sohai to the max Hmmm.... now you said it. made me wonder.98% not meet the criteria, i think the one set the rule must be want to halau foreigner and want to keep orang kite only and rohinya Due to increasingly hostile conditions in HK , many hongkies decided to move elsewhere is eyeing Malaysia, with some already promoting our country via socmed. Perhaps thats the reason why gomen tighten the mm2h requirements, to "limit" the undesirables group that happen to be born a different color? We still welcome fellow "brothers" like what you written though without expecting them to be rich either, and even offer more than just a place to stay (and breed). This post has been edited by alanyuppie: Sep 30 2021, 11:01 AM |
|
|
Sep 30 2021, 11:19 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,834 posts Joined: Jul 2006 From: here |
QUOTE(dman @ Sep 30 2021, 12:17 PM) Like this also can linked DAP! Will he barked the same shit if the foreigners DAP protected consisted of palestinians and rohingyans?He questioned 'apa agenda sebenar DAP mahu pertahankan foreigner '. Anything DAP protest is wrong and konpem got agenda buruk behind it. These kind of ppl will not progress and alwiz find fault with others while thinks ownself holy like fuark.. This post has been edited by alanyuppie: Sep 30 2021, 11:20 AM |
|
|
Sep 30 2021, 12:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,834 posts Joined: Jul 2006 From: here |
QUOTE(sky2006 @ Sep 30 2021, 01:00 PM) Another way to look at it is another half of the participants have the financial capability to renew it. LOL. its like when rampant robbery in a housing area with 50% already fallen victims . Is it good or bad? Depend on how you look at it Another way to look at is " the other 50% still safe and continue living there with no fear". |
| Change to: | 0.0213sec
0.39
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 20th December 2025 - 10:45 AM |