QUOTE(kart @ Apr 17 2022, 09:58 AM)
Thank you for your explanation, cybpsych. I am sorry that I did not correctly state my question.
As you said, TnG can just blanket request ZCity / ATX to disable CC payment for TnG reload pins.
It may not be the decision made by ZCity / ATX to to disable CC payment, but ZCity / ATX have to obey the decision made by TnG.
yes likely soAs you said, TnG can just blanket request ZCity / ATX to disable CC payment for TnG reload pins.
It may not be the decision made by ZCity / ATX to to disable CC payment, but ZCity / ATX have to obey the decision made by TnG.
tng is the ultimate owner of the pins.
zcity/atx still want to earn commission by selling tng pin anyway
if they disobey tng, they don't get the pin stocks to sell
however, fpx cost could be higher (fixed rate mdr) rather than cc which is usually based on % mdr. depending on the rates zcity is getting from ipay88, at some deno value, fpx cost would be cheaper too (probably higher deno value)
eg
if cc mdr is 1%, rm300 pin would get hit with rm3 mdr fee (pay to ipay88)
if fpx mdr is rm0.80 per transaction, zcity pay less to ipay88.
of course they will need to pay atx for the pin stocks (likely get % commission for each pin sold .... or discounted price for each pin)
all in all, don't think zcity would suffer much, commercially, as long as they keep selling tng pin.
this is more inconvenience to cardholders.
Apr 17 2022, 10:11 AM

Quote






0.1268sec
1.06
7 queries
GZIP Disabled