Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
7 Pages  1 2 3 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Military Thread V28

views
     
jwst1313
post Sep 17 2021, 10:42 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
3 posts

Joined: Jan 2018
user posted image
user posted image
[url=https://pictr.com/image/BldUQf]user posted image[/url

The top and bottom picture vessel is same, the LCS kelas maharajalela stealth missile frigate which not delivered. Late 4 years.

The vessel that delivered 2 days ago by Bousted is the LMS 700 tons (middle picture) , no missle only gun.

2 days ago bousted launch 3rd LMS but the photo they use is not correct. They use the kelas maharaja lela gowind stealth frigate picture as the LMS . How can show this mistakes Boustead??

LMS is china made Keris Klass only 700 metric tons only guns

LCS in French Naval Group Maharaja lela Kelas Gowind is 3100 metric tons missile frigate. LCS very stealth. Langsung rak nampak

Bousted, please la correct your mistake

This post has been edited by jwst1313: Sep 17 2021, 10:52 PM
jwst1313
post Sep 17 2021, 11:02 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
3 posts

Joined: Jan 2018
QUOTE(darth5zaft @ Sep 17 2021, 06:49 PM)
1) that's why I said 500 mil ain't going to buy us much particularly with the weak RM Nowdays.  500 mil a piece is the original budget for a single LCS back then, need a bit of a top up for a marthadinata class back then. With rm 500 mil nowdays we can't even get a Diponegoro class. manhen said recently  only 8 RLCS (down from 18 to 12 to 8) would be bought next year, 2 MRSS by 2024, 6 NGPV by 2026. Hopefully those NGPV get a size upgrade like RLCS and get to type 31 size.

2) that's the reason why them Chinese hasn't been very aggressive here compared to there.the more foreign battleship coming, the bigger ID & SG ship get the better.at the end we can't do it alone. Off course them coming might triggered them Chinese to suddenly get aggressive and build a base on luconia. At this point in time i say AF built up is more important than navy build up.

3) well there's 8 NGPC  more to come, and they already say they open for new design.
*
The Gowind 3100 tons is the most expensive light frigate yet lowly armed. You only have 16 short range Mica VLS of 16 km (effective range 12 km). Your land attack missle on konesburg 8 units. This mean your Maharaja lela cannot be efficient multi purpose light frigate (can do both AAW and ASW)

TLDM asked for ESSM VLS on MK41 launcher. Range 50 km for AAW. 8 silo can fill up to 32 VLS missile and Konesburg. But you traded the Essm vls mk 41 with the expensive short range MICA VLS.

Your Gowind Maharaja lela originally cost RM$1.52 billion a vessel. Not cost overrun and cost you RM$2.0 billion for such vessel. This defense procurement has fail

Finally after 4 years not even one of the 6 ship ever went on sea trial even RM$6 billion paid. If paid RM$6 billion , 4 vessels are ready but nothing ready. Too stealthy tak nampak. I read in Jane defence that builder ask for additional Rm$1.4 bil due to cost over run.

If not ready to do it , why built all here. Somemore you change the original design from 2500 tons to 3100 tons. You have never built a stealth warship, now even change design and try all here. I tabik at you all😁!!! .I bet if built 3 in Naval Group and 3 here, at least 3 sailing now and our engineers learn from the french. Sekian

This post has been edited by jwst1313: Sep 17 2021, 11:11 PM
jwst1313
post Sep 17 2021, 11:13 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
3 posts

Joined: Jan 2018
QUOTE(alexz23 @ Sep 17 2021, 04:24 PM)
I hope you understand my narrative right. I am pushing this not against buying ASW Helis or MPAs, but pushing this cheaper and more versatile option against the navy getting useless much more expensive RLMS like ships for LMS Batch 2.

We can innovate and be the benchmark for the future, or we can imitate others even if it is not exactly suitable for our needs.

Yes of course we still need ASW helis for our Gowind frigates.

We still need MPAs as the eye in the sky.
Yes I fully consider my force structure against an expected threat. Not against China that is invading us, but a China wanting to keep us out of the South China Sea. A strong MMEA with large OPVs and adequate array of other ships to keep Chinese Coast Guard from harassing our economic activities day in and out, with a lean heavily armed TLDM able to strike back if anyone want to start any conflicts.
*
What a hag, the LMS are 700 tons gun boat. Thats all

jwst1313
post Sep 18 2021, 08:32 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
3 posts

Joined: Jan 2018
QUOTE(darth5zaft @ Sep 17 2021, 11:57 PM)
Well it's not mine.
I'm not duli yang maha mulia seri paduka baginda yang di-Pertuan agong., I wish I were. whistling.gif
Joke aside. Yes it's a fail procurement.

MiCa are chosen compared to ESSM despite ESSM are a far better missiles but both cost about the same. We all know why they did it

Setis are use, despite request for tacticos also we all know why

Go for a custom made vessel, rather than something off the shelf them go buy the blueprint of those vessel pumping the price up 300% from original budget also we all know why.

But to bastard shipyards credit.
Technically the 1st ship are complete but some reports says navy refuse to sign the ship management system and thus it cannot work lah. It's all Hardware without any software install. Navy also reportedly keep changing spefication even after the steel are being cut which results in cost overun. Thought this is mostly their fault for being a dick to their own clients.

Also the price hike from 9 to 12 is not their fault. Mostly the fault of oil crisis that dropped the RM value. They also  need to milk some money desperately since they are deeply in debt as a result of them being the white knight for the Kedah class.

It's a komedi really.
*
The Formidable Class of Singapore 3200 tons is actually smaller version of French La Fayette class 6000 tons also built by Naval Group (same company that built and design Gowind Maharaja lela)

Even Singapore ST Marine Engineering, they are very advanced in building vessel, never dare not take all change design vessel all built all in Singapore.

Instead they built one in Naval Group France and 5 in ST Marine Engineering. Why do that? Let your local engineers learn on the site.

Note only buy blue print only cannot built warship. If can do that better buy mercedes, bmw and F35 blue print and make here. Not that easy. Blue print is not eveeything.

The 1st vessel RSS Formidable was comissioned in 2007. The after that every year, 2 vessels.

Formidable class are more potent stealth ship

1) use Thales Herakles Pesa Radar (stronger)
2) Have 32 Aster 15 + Aster 30 Vls for air defence
3) Harpoon
4) Anti submarine torpedoe
5) Heli
6) Ciws

All are completed more then 6 years ago

How many of us are aware that TLDM have only 2 missile capable light frigate (2200 ton) which is the model F2000 purchased from UK in 1995/1996. They are the Lekiu Class. From 1995 to 2021 is 25 years. Both the Lekiu Class has been serving 25 years. Both vessel has undergone SLEP (service life extension program) in 2014/2015 to increase the operational life span of the very very old vessel.

Whose fault is it and why it is not corrected? Sekian. I am a rakyat Malaysia and it is very sad to see this happend to us.

See Formidable class below.



user posted image
user posted image

This post has been edited by jwst1313: Sep 18 2021, 08:35 AM
jwst1313
post Sep 18 2021, 08:45 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
3 posts

Joined: Jan 2018
QUOTE(red streak @ Sep 17 2021, 11:23 PM)
Kasi chan macha. Cronies need to makan oso. Deswai our military procurements are always crippled while certain pockets are filled to the brim whistling.gif
*
Every month I pay tax before I even use my salary😄😁

This post has been edited by jwst1313: Sep 18 2021, 08:46 AM
jwst1313
post Sep 18 2021, 08:50 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
3 posts

Joined: Jan 2018
The picture of vessel 3 days ago when bustead announced in media launching 3rd LMS 700 metrics tons gun boat. Thr picture attach is wrong. That is the 3100 stealth maharaja lela gowind 3100 tons not ready one

The LMS is the middle picture 700 tons gun boat

user posted image
user posted image
user posted image

This post has been edited by jwst1313: Sep 18 2021, 08:53 AM
jwst1313
post Sep 18 2021, 08:58 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
3 posts

Joined: Jan 2018
PT PAL yesterday sign for 2 Arrowhead 140 Multi Purpose Frigate 5700 tons (both Air Defence and Anti Submarine capable)

32 Essm on MK 41 VLS
Ciws
Either Harpoon advanced
One Merlin Heli
Torpedoes

Built in Indonesia yard between PT PAL and designer Babcock UK

Arrowhead 140 is the similar design to Type 31 UK

user posted image
user posted image
jwst1313
post Sep 18 2021, 09:15 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
3 posts

Joined: Jan 2018
QUOTE(alexz23 @ Sep 15 2021, 11:50 PM)
.
I would like to know where did you get all those cheap ESSM...
ESSM price for USN 2021 buy is 1.795 million dollars each. Which is RM7.518 million.
https://www.stratvocate.com/files/2021/WPN_...9/WPN_Book.html
If even the Gowinds can carry just 16 VL MICA, it is impossible for tun fatimah OPV to carry 36. It just can't. Even Indonesian Sigma Frigates carry just 12 VL MICA.
ESSM could be quadpacked inside mk41 vertical launchers. That is the advantage of ESSM. Thai Daewoo DW-3000F Frigate has 8x mk41 with maximum possible ESSM loadout of 32 missiles.
*
You have to understand Essm VLS MK 41, one silo can fill 4 missiles. This mean standard 8 silo fill up 32 missiles

In Mica and Aster, one silo fill up one missile. So 16 silio = 16 missile.

And Essm on VLS MK 41, is hot launch and the range is 50 km, Thai, Indonesia, Australia, Japan, South Korea, USA, Canada, New Zealand use VLS mk 41.



jwst1313
post Sep 18 2021, 09:16 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
3 posts

Joined: Jan 2018
QUOTE(Lampuajaib @ Sep 18 2021, 09:11 AM)
There is no 6000 ton La fayette frigate.
Formidable class is 115m long ship. It is a shorter variant than the original 125m La fayete class.
Aster 15 only installed on it while the aster 30 is used as land based air defense.
*
Important is the ships ready on time and built accordingly. You delay 4 years means fail
jwst1313
post Sep 18 2021, 09:20 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
3 posts

Joined: Jan 2018
QUOTE(Lampuajaib @ Sep 18 2021, 09:11 AM)
There is no 6000 ton La fayette frigate.
Formidable class is 115m long ship. It is a shorter variant than the original 125m La fayete class.
Aster 15 only installed on it while the aster 30 is used as land based air defense.
*


Thank you. Only 3800 tons+ for French Navy Tks

As long as the vessel ready on time. I wonder you are from bustead or not. If you are from spore, sorry for my error info.

But for bustead do you know you show a picture of LCS 3100 Tons gowind when you lauch 3rd LMS 700 tons gun boat? Two entirely different vessel la

This post has been edited by jwst1313: Sep 18 2021, 09:29 AM
jwst1313
post Sep 18 2021, 09:43 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
3 posts

Joined: Jan 2018
QUOTE(Lampuajaib @ Sep 18 2021, 09:37 AM)
How ID is building their local defence capability is much better than what TNI gets.
It is understandable because ID put heaviily their defence on their own hand. Building locally is very important to them.
PT PAL will be the most capable shipyard in the region.
*
If you read PT PAL history, you understand,

Learn to crawl before you leap or climb.
jwst1313
post Sep 18 2021, 01:48 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
3 posts

Joined: Jan 2018
QUOTE(azriel @ Sep 18 2021, 11:42 AM)
PT PAL Indonesia in its article claimed they will be able to build 3 frigates in a year. Lets see if they can build 2 AH140 + 1 FREMM or vice versa in a year.
https://pal.co.id/2021/08/publikasi/news-be...-kawasan-asean/
*
Well PT PAL has proven themselves again and again. They built many 7,000 to 10,000 tons support ships to Asean countriez and even to TLDM.

Talk to Indonesia engineer on a subject and then you talk the same subject to a Malaysian engineer. See the difference .

PT PAL and ST Marine Engineering. The rest No.

This post has been edited by jwst1313: Sep 18 2021, 01:50 PM
jwst1313
post Sep 18 2021, 02:09 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
3 posts

Joined: Jan 2018
user posted image

I have said before no point opposition to keep arguing who is responsible for the LCS Gowind Maharajalela screw up. Because problem never solve by politiking and TLDM never get the vessels

The important subject is to save the LCS Gowind project becos TLDM really really need them .

Rewrite back history, get 4 vessels done instead of 6 vessels for the same original price RM$9.12 billion. This mean price per vessel is RM$2.28 billion, BUT with conditions -

1) Boustead to complete only 4 vessels and passed the sea trials and hand over to TLDM within a specific time.

2) The VLS must have ER Mica (Extended Range Mica 40 km) and NOT short range Mica (16 km)

3) The Konesburg missle must be installed

4) maintain black shark torpedoe

5) maintain Same 57 mm main gun and 30 nn gun

6) if can setis change to Thales tacticos.

After all 4 fully completed and handover to TLDM, gomen pay the balance RM$3.12 billion (rm$6 bil already paid)

It is a fair deal at win win situation. Builder Bustead CEO should look at it. Put this on the table to the government. TLDM get 4 vessels with ER Mica and builder get balance of payment of RM$3.12 billion. But balance of payment of pay upon completion and hand over all 4 vessels to TLDM.

Its a good deal for bustead. Build less 2 vessels at the same total price. And TLDM get at least 4 vessels. Sekian

This post has been edited by jwst1313: Sep 18 2021, 03:45 PM
jwst1313
post Sep 18 2021, 03:26 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
3 posts

Joined: Jan 2018
QUOTE(alexz23 @ Sep 18 2021, 02:25 PM)
it was a good project.

rather than just getting corvettes as originally planned under SGPV,  we should be getting 6 frigates.

but then...
*
The Gowind LCS was originally modularvdesign of 1000 tons, 1500 tons and 2500 tons. Non of the European navy use Gowind even it was designed by Naval Grouo. It was sold to UAE as original 2500 tons .

But Malaysia took a too bold move to change a modular design from 2500 tons corvettes into a 3100 so called light frigates.

It involved redesign and realignment and off courae $$$ up by I am not sure but at leaat 200%. And boustead do not have the expertise and skill to build steah warship from scrap. You buy the blue print already cost you at leaat RM$1 billion.

Is it worth it this lesson at the hand of politikus?? Better buy from ST Marine , Hyundai or Babcock.
jwst1313
post Sep 18 2021, 03:30 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
3 posts

Joined: Jan 2018
QUOTE(alexz23 @ Sep 18 2021, 02:25 PM)
it was a good project.

rather than just getting corvettes as originally planned under SGPV,  we should be getting 6 frigates.

but then...
*
Do you know both the Lekiu class are the only larger missile corvettes F2000 british design of 2,200 tons? Already 25 years in servive . Taken SLEP in 2014. There are only 2 vessels KD Lekiu and KD Jebat and must guard South china Sea and Straits of Malacca

Both ships are getting old but they are the only missile capable corvettes for TLDM. So how....extend their service life again until 2040 or for another 20 years?

This post has been edited by jwst1313: Sep 18 2021, 03:34 PM
jwst1313
post Sep 18 2021, 03:36 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
3 posts

Joined: Jan 2018
QUOTE(Kakwen @ Sep 18 2021, 03:26 PM)
Why malaysia build 3100 ton instead use original 2500 ton? Didnt upgrade weapon also
*
Good question. Why not stay at 2500 tons modular design?? Hahaha....😄😋😋
You change design and buy blue print cost you billions but they are not multi purpose light frigate (can perform both AAW and ASW)😁😁😆

Instead pay a bom for ASW

This post has been edited by jwst1313: Sep 18 2021, 03:49 PM
jwst1313
post Sep 18 2021, 05:53 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
3 posts

Joined: Jan 2018
QUOTE(darth5zaft @ Sep 18 2021, 04:42 PM)
Unlikely to happened.hahahaha

BNS is not MMEH. BNS is relatively new shipyards with not much experience nor have much commercials customer. And thus they relied heavily on their monopoly of navy ship building & maintenance. Without a navy contract they don't have money and thus they won't be able to finish the ship.  Like it or not gov need to transfer them the money first not them handing over ship 1st before getting paid.
The problem at BNS is not the lack of good engineer it's the lack of capable & talented management. When the ringgit goes to the drain, rather than trying to salvage and complete at least some ships (that's would win them public & thus political support) they priorities prepaying overseas suppliers. As it is ,it's impossible to cancel the other 2 ship as all the material are already paid for and are here. You can cancelled it buy you ain't getting much saving from it.

MiCa missiles hasn't been bought,what they bought is only the mica launchers. Not sure if current arrangements can enable mica er to be install or not. If you go around and install tacticos might as well just use ESSM. Completing a ship for the sake of completing a ship like the kedah is something we shouldn't do anymore. The ship are build to do a particular task, if it can't do that particular task, you are just wasting money operating & maintaining those ship.

For a custom solution this one bolehlah priced, the belharra frigates afterall cost RM3.5 billions per unit inclusive of R&D cost. RM 2 billion per unit if the R&D cost are absorbed by their taxes payers.
*
Finally i hear it. You do not have expertise die die want to redesign and buy blue print and try built all 6 here in an inexperienced shipyard not even build a small 800 tons corvettes prior to that. And you want to leap before you craw to built 6 stealth 3100 tons vessel

If this way as said by respondent , maybe IF LUCKY government pay balance rm$3.12 billion, max get only 2 vessels. One vessel RM$4.5 billion for ASW 🤑🤑 or it too bad all goes to scrap yard rm9.12 billion

This post has been edited by jwst1313: Sep 18 2021, 06:02 PM
jwst1313
post Sep 18 2021, 08:29 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
3 posts

Joined: Jan 2018
I have a question.

The LCS Gowind 3100 tons Maharajalela, why must built all in Boustead?

Would it be an advantage if:-

1) 1st and 2nd vessels built in Naval Shipyard France, with Boustead engineers there. Technologhy and engineering skill transfer to local engineers in actual advanced ship building and commissioning of a stealth warship

2) Balance 4 vessels built here.

Ever considered this option? Would it be a better option since engineering knowledge and skill aquired from the 1st and 2nd vessel learned from the designer Naval Group in France.

The Gowind already cost RM$9.12 billion. It is a huge investment. Might as well invest another RM$250 million for a team staying in Naval Group for 3 years. It is worth the investment and training

This post has been edited by jwst1313: Sep 18 2021, 08:30 PM
jwst1313
post Sep 18 2021, 08:41 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
3 posts

Joined: Jan 2018
QUOTE(alexz23 @ Sep 18 2021, 08:31 PM)
.
I wouldn't choose any of them.

the latest KCR batch 3 number 5 and 6 which is fully armed cost Rupiah 800 miliar or around 56 million dollars each.

https://money.kompas.com/read/2019/08/02/16...-rp-1-6-triliun
*
I take the KCR 60 anytime over the LMS.

Their platform is missile fast attack craft both AAW and ASW similar to the Dutch / Swedish technology.



user posted image
user posted image

This post has been edited by jwst1313: Sep 18 2021, 08:43 PM
jwst1313
post Sep 18 2021, 08:47 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
3 posts

Joined: Jan 2018
Lets look at Sigma fast attack craft and European fast attack craft below

Sorry double posted kcr 60 m

user posted image
user posted image

This post has been edited by jwst1313: Sep 18 2021, 08:50 PM

7 Pages  1 2 3 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0940sec    0.35    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 10th December 2025 - 05:07 PM