QUOTE(mauli74 @ Nov 23 2024, 05:47 PM)
1. Yes
2. Not so sure.
I'd love to hear more about this if anyone know how it works as I think whoever want to upgrade will be more likely to be unhealthy or more willingly to claim for more hospilization/expense since they have unlimited annual limit though with RM500 deductible.
Though they also are more health-awared.
This upgrade is offered to most of my family even with previous claim with chronic/old age illness or some "one and done".
But one of my sibiling had claimed for hospitilization with dengue as a child which I considered "one and done" , even after 20years , no "guaranteed upgrade" ever came.
Not this time either.
I am puzzled.
Insurance companies are not gonna offer this to the unhealthy ones. If they give you this good deal, most likely they will give it to whom they think is healthy. if you claim cancer or anything chronic, or if you are diabetic, they definitely wont give you this upgrade offer. provided of course, they know...
EDIT: typo
QUOTE(limaa210 @ Nov 25 2024, 01:21 PM)
Thank you for all your insightful replies. Another question regarding standalone as another member has mentioned below but probably hasn't got a reply, is that standalone insurance tends to get premium increase more often (yearly or every 2years), because of no ILP part to support in increase in healthcare cost these days, is this true?
short answer, not true.
long answer, there's alot of nuances to the differences of how standalone medical works and how ILP works which gave this perception. alot of people think the "investment portion" is supporting the increase of healthcare cost. It is somewhat helping abit but at the end of the day, you still need to pay for it. in a way, it's kinda you paying it earlier, so now you can delay the increase, but if you delay increase now, you need to pay more later.
In an ideal world, if you manage your investment well on your own, your buy ILP medical, but you pay just enough premium every month to offset the charges. but not enough enough to have alot of surplus in your "investment portion" since we keep arguing the "unit trust" all charges high fund management charge and they perform badly. this way, the company dont earn your FMC and you get the better medical coverage from the one they offer under the ILP plan. but this will be too much work. and the insurance company probably dont make it that easy for you to pay premium when you like it...
(sadly, this is true as the FMC for equity funds are 1.5% and we know this number is absurd and you average 4% 5% p.a. return, might as well i put in EPF or FD, at least FD i get 4% without the fluctuation).
This post has been edited by adele123: Nov 25 2024, 09:18 PM